Now on ScienceBlogs: Charles Darwin February 12, 1809 - April 19, 1882

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Effect Measure

Effect Measure is a forum for progressive public health discussion and argument as well as a source of public health information from around the web that interests the Editor(s)

Search

Profile

The Editors of Effect Measure are senior public health scientists and practitioners. Paul Revere was a member of the first local Board of Health in the United States (Boston, 1799). The Editors sign their posts "Revere" to recognize the public service of a professional forerunner better known for other things.

Nation-approved.sml.jpg

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Categories

Archives

Public Health/Medical Links

Bird Flu Links

Other Links

Iraq

Group Efforts

Other Information

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Old Effect Measure site

Technorati Profile

« Palin comparison, III: sexual orientation | Main | Palin comparison, IV: Troopergate »

The complexity of the spread of flu virus

Category: Bird fluEpidemiologybiology
Posted on: September 5, 2008 7:48 AM, by revere

When influenza viruses with different genetic make-up co-infect a cell there is the possibility that they will mix their genetic endowments. The influenza virus is designed to do only one thing: make a copy of itself. It does this by tricking the host's protein manufacturing machinery to use the virus's genetic blueprint to make a viral copy. Influenza genes come in eight discrete packages and at some point these genetic segments are naked in the cell. If the segments of two viruses are in the cell at the same time the segments can mix and match, with some of the segments of one virus being packaged in the progeny viruses with segments from the other virus. This is called reassortment of gene segments. It is a major mechanism of genetic variation in flu viruses. Two of the segments have coding regions for two proteins in the outer protein coat of the virus, hemagglutinin and neuraminidase. There are 16 different major versions (subtypes) of the hemagglutinin protein (each with lots of strain variation) and 9 neuraminidase subtypes. The hemagglutinin subtypes are numbered 1 to 16 and neuraminidase subtypes 1 to 9. The only subtypes that normally infect humans are H1, H2 and H3 and N1 and N2. Today the seasonal flu viruses are either H1N1 or H3N2. But evidence has been emerging for a few years that the actual situation is much more complex because there are 6 other gene segments and they also reassort. A paper from the Holmes group at Penn State and their collaborators has started to fill some of the details:

Researchers who conducted genetic analyses of hundreds of influenza viruses collected during the 2006-07 flu season found that many different variants circulated in the US at the same time, suggesting that the way each year's epidemic spreads is more complicated than previously suspected.

The scientists, led by Martha I. Nelson of Pennsylvania State University as first author, found that several different clades, or lineages, of influenza A subtypes H1N1 and H3N2 circulated at the same time and even in the same localities, according to the report in PLoS Pathogens.

"Overall, the co-circulation of multiple viral clades during the 2006-2007 epidemic season revealed patterns of spatial spread that are far more complex than observed previously, and suggests a major role for both migration and reassortment in shaping the epidemiological dynamics of human influenza A virus," the report states. It says the findings indicate that several viral strains were introduced separately into the country.

Among other things, the authors found that clades of the same subtype (H1N1 or H3N2) exchanged genetic material through reassortment in a number of instances. In one case, this gave rise to an H3N2 variant that was sensitive to the antiviral drugs amantadine and rimantadine, unlike most H3N2 strains in recent years. (Robert Roos, CIDRAP News)

There were nearly 300 isolates from a season that was dominated by H1N1, but this subtype (H1N1) was present in 8 different variants or lineages, representing different combinations of the other gene segments. There was much less variation in the H3N2 subtype that year (only two lineages). The same location always had more than variant (whenever the location had more than one isolate), so all sorts of variations of influenza virus are circulating simultaneously, sometimes in the same infected person. Houston, Texas, had six different lineages of H1N1 circulating at once.

Is there a pattern in the spread of the different variants? If there is, it isn't evident at this point:

"Rather than a single viral lineage spreading across the US, multiple lineages of both A/H3N2 and A/H1N1 influenza virus were separately introduced and co-circulated, allowing for reassortment within subtypes and greatly complicating patterns of spatial-temporal spread," the report states. "Given the extent of genetic diversity observed during this season, obtaining a strong signal for the spatial-temporal pattern of spread of multiple different lineages clearly would entail a large increase in sampling." (quoted from Nelson MI, Edelman L, Spiro DJ, et al. Molecular epidemiology of A/H3N2 and AH1N1 influenza viruses during a single epidemic season in the United States, PLoS Pathogens 2008;4(8))

We shouldn't be surprised at this. If the H and N segments reassort so do the others, and they aren't "seen" as easily (or at all) by the immune system. It is only recently we have had the ability to analyze the full complement of genetic detail in hundreds of related isolates. Along with this new information will have to come new ways of mathematical analysis, an absolute necessity if we are to make sense of the fire hose quantity of raw data being produced by these techniques.

Lots to do and technically difficult.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Medicine & Health

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/80404

Comments

1

however HA and NA seem to reassort more than the other segments.
Or probably better: reassortants which just only change
the HA survive
and spread more often than others.

But since usually flu dies out in America in Summer and is reintroduced the next season
newly from Asia, this is not really evolution. Just some playingground in a distant
continent, while evolution happens in SE-Asia

Posted by: anon | September 5, 2008 8:12 AM

2

anon: What's the evidence that HA and NA reassort more? I'm not aware of it, so I'm interested in what you base that on.

Posted by: revere | September 5, 2008 8:36 AM

3

I was reading today about the "universal" flu vaccine. They promise it will be a "kill all" for the flu, regardless of H and N antigen make up. It seems plausible to me, but I am still a bit dubious.

Posted by: Ren | September 5, 2008 2:16 PM

4

Ren: We've discussed it a number of times, most recently here and here. We waiting to see.

Posted by: revere | September 5, 2008 2:42 PM

5

more successful reassortment in HA and NA should
already follow from the increased diversity in HA and NA.

But I think there are also direct observations to
indicate this. Alberta ducks, maybe.
Also intrasubtype reassortments in humans, 1941,1947(H1N1),2003(H3N2), pandemics 1957,1968...

Posted by: anon | September 5, 2008 3:04 PM

6

anon: The underlying question relates to the pressures on the genotypes. Why do you assert there is "more successful" reassortment in HA and NA? What do you mean by this and what's the evidence? What is the diversity of NS1 or PB2?

Posted by: revere | September 5, 2008 3:17 PM

7


16 types of HA, 9 types of NA and each of these is almost
as diverse as any single-type of the other segments.
checking here:
http://www.flugenome.org/show_genomes.php
I count 12,9,11,79,8,51,7,12 different groups of diversity in the 8 segments.
(segment 4 is HA, segment 6 is NA)

When you just search for reassortments in genome-sets
by computer, I think you usually find overproportionally
many (my experience) with just acquisition of another
HA or NA or both. These types of reassortants seem to be more viable.
I have no rigorously prepared data, but could do it -
it just takes some time and effort.

Posted by: anon | September 5, 2008 4:40 PM

8

anon: Fair enough. Reasonable answer. Let me ponder it.

Posted by: revere | September 5, 2008 4:48 PM

9

What about recombination? Reassortment has traditionally been restricted to the transfer of a complete gene between two strains infecting the same cell. Recombination on the other hand theorizes the transfer small segments of RNA between influenza virons much smaller than entire genes.

The findings reported in this article could in part be due to recombination.

Revere what is your opinion?

Posted by: The Doctor | September 5, 2008 7:51 PM

10

The Doctor: I've kept an open mind about the possibility of homologous recombination, but the studies that have looked hard for it (e.g., from Holmes's group) has shown it rarely occurs, the pattern that pertains to other negative sense RNA viruses. So for now I agree with the scientific consensus it isn't a major driver of genetic variation. When published studies present contrary evidence I'll consider it. I don't mention it much here because it always causes a contentious argument I don't think is very useful and has proved very distracting, not to say, destructive at other flu sites.

Posted by: revere | September 5, 2008 8:38 PM

11

Thanks Revere.

Posted by: The Doctor | September 6, 2008 12:20 PM

12

industrial, industry, industrie, accident, equipment, lighting, packaging, property, safety, supplies, electronics, flooring, products, chemical, furniture, health, accidents, hygiene, plastic, automotive, welding, woodworking, cutting, grinding, design, drilling, filling, heavy, food, second hand, paper, simple, machinery, machine, machines, maschinen, business, mastercam, router, training, cae, cnc, shirink, machinery, machine, machines, maschinen

Thanks a lot...

Posted by: Makina Park | September 9, 2008 10:53 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.