Now on ScienceBlogs: The Galaxy's Biggest Valentine

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Effect Measure

Effect Measure is a forum for progressive public health discussion and argument as well as a source of public health information from around the web that interests the Editor(s)

Search

Profile

The Editors of Effect Measure are senior public health scientists and practitioners. Paul Revere was a member of the first local Board of Health in the United States (Boston, 1799). The Editors sign their posts "Revere" to recognize the public service of a professional forerunner better known for other things.

Nation-approved.sml.jpg

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Categories

Archives

Public Health/Medical Links

Bird Flu Links

Other Links

Iraq

Group Efforts

Other Information

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Old Effect Measure site

Technorati Profile

« New Ebola virus | Main | Freethinker Sunday Sermonette: Wichita Falls, Texas »

Recording industry accused of wire fraud, corrupt practices

Category: Intellectual property
Posted on: November 22, 2008 3:33 PM, by revere

More delicious irony concerning the bottom feeders at the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), the copyright thugs whose frivolous lawsuits extort money from innocent teens, grandmas and those in between. They are being hit with another counter claim ((the first was rejected) in Atlantic Recording v. Raleigh, a case being heard in St. Louis, MO. This time an amended class action claim in being filed under RICO, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act.

The allegations?

  • RICO
  • Fraud
  • Conspiracy
  • Trespass
  • Prima Facie Tort
  • violation of the Computer Fraud & Abuse Act

And the class upon whose behalf the claims of extortion, mail fraud, and wire fraud are being made?

All persons residing in the United States who:

a. were falsely accused by Counterclaim Defendants and RIAA of downloading copyrighted sound recordings owned by the ounterclaim Defendants and making them available for distribution or mass distribution over a P2P network and who incurred costs and damages including legal fees in defense of such false claims; and/or

b. whose computers used in interstate commerce and/or communication were accessed by Counterclaim Defendants without permission or authority through conduct involving interstate communication and from which information was obtained in violation of such person's rights within two years prior to the date of the filing of this amended counterclaim

RIAA has deep enough pockets so that defending themselves isn't a problem. But being tagged for any of these claims would be. It's not clear the judge has the guts to allow this counterclaim, so we'll have to see.

But the irony is just too, too good.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Technology

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/86257

Comments

1

Dont hold your breath Revere. Its going to be tossed out. Reason is that the network even though it belongs to someone else IS accessible via their contract with the recording industry either by direct recording company or RIAA.

Ever read that fine print on your P2P? We dumped ours because of some of the other things that are in it. Basically you give up your rights to use it.

Not a technicality toss either. The original suit will stand and likely, a lot of people are going to get a bill.

Stay the hell off of facebook too folks. You might as well be taking your clothes off and submitting to a lower GI inspection tour.

Posted by: M. Randolph Kruger | November 22, 2008 4:46 PM

2

If the courts dealt them the same kind of justice the Mob gets, hundreds of these guys would go away for long prison terms, which would likely lead to an epidemic of laughing jags.

Posted by: Rose Colored Glasses | November 22, 2008 4:56 PM

3

Waiting for Paul to bloviate.....
in 4, 3, 2, 1, ......

Posted by: BGT | November 22, 2008 11:41 PM

4

I'm wasted on this topic, BGT. I think Revere's had enough of me on this as well. But nice of you to think of me.

Be Well,
Paul.

Posted by: Paul | November 23, 2008 12:16 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.