Now on ScienceBlogs: The Laboratory at Harvard

Seed Media Group

Effect Measure

Effect Measure is a forum for progressive public health discussion and argument as well as a source of public health information from around the web that interests the Editor(s)

Search

Profile

The Editors of Effect Measure are senior public health scientists and practitioners. Paul Revere was a member of the first local Board of Health in the United States (Boston, 1799). The Editors sign their posts "Revere" to recognize the public service of a professional forerunner better known for other things.

Nation-approved.sml.jpg

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Categories

Archives

Public Health/Medical Links

Bird Flu Links

Other Links

Iraq

Group Efforts

Other Information

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Old Effect Measure site

Technorati Profile

« China syndrome? | Main | Utah Republicans try to deep six their Health Department »

Annals of peanut butter, continued

Category: FDAFoodFood safety
Posted on: January 23, 2009 7:04 AM, by revere

PetSmart's Grreat Choice Dog Biscuit isn't such a great choice for fido because they contain peanut paste with salmonella. It may also not be so Grreat for fido's owners:

Dr. Stephen Sundlof, a veterinarian who is the director of the FDA's Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, said that the risk to animals is minimal but that people who handle contaminated treats could come in contact with the salmonella bacteria.

"It's especially important that children wash their hands after feeding treats to pets" because the bacteria could be on the surface, Sundlof said. (CNN)

PetSmart has removed the biscuits and hasn't reported any illnesses amongst its customers. I'm not sure how its customers would call them, but that's something else again.

Meanwhile FDA is saying the Peanut Corporation of America's Blakely, Georgia processing plant is the source of the problem. Besides the pet food the plant makes cookies, crackers and ice cream, 125 products in all. The bug was found in unopened containers seeming to rule out post processing contamination. FDA expects more recalls. The latest is peanut butter granola bar in the NutriSystem product line. Salmonella infection would seem to be a pretty good way to lose weight, but I guess the company wants to earn its money the old fashioned way: by scamming you with advertising with the tiny letters at the bottom o the screen that say, "results not typical."

Typical.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/92158

Comments

1

"Besides the pet food the plant makes cookies, crackers and ice cream, 125 products in all."

This should be the real take-home message of the outbreak, as it should have been after this summer's not-tomatoes outbreak. We have a food production and distribution system where mistakes (or negligence) at one place can contaminate hundreds of products shipped to every state and around the world. That's a problem. And all of the criticizing (in some instances unfairly, in others correctly) of the government's response to the problem won't change the fact that the real problem is that it could happen in the first place.

Posted by: Anonymous | January 23, 2009 10:50 AM

2

Just a small point. I don't believe the Blakely plant makes the pet food, the cookies, crackers or ice cream. It makes the peanut butter and paste that other manufacturers use in making pet food, cookies, crackers etc.

Posted by: MoM | January 23, 2009 1:37 PM

3

MoM: Yes, that's a better (more precise) way to put it.

Posted by: revere | January 23, 2009 1:54 PM

4

The acting director of the CDC, Richard Besser, spent his days in the EIS investigating food-borne diseases. Maybe there is hope for America.

CDC: http://www.cdc.gov/about/leadership/leaders/besser.htm

Posted by: ODS | January 23, 2009 9:34 PM

5

The allegation that Salmonella poisoning is a "good way to lose weight" is preposterous, insensitive and downright offensive / repulsive. If you haven't read the news, people have died as the result of this peanut plant, not from the food manufacturers.

Posted by: Anonymous | January 24, 2009 11:14 AM

6

Anonymous: LOL. For Crissakes, lighten up. I've written dozens of posts about this and my record is pretty clear on the seriousness of the food safety problem. You obviously missed the whole point of the comment, which wasn't about salmonella but about the diet hucksters.

Posted by: revere | January 24, 2009 11:29 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Enter to win

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM