Now on ScienceBlogs: Charles Darwin February 12, 1809 - April 19, 1882

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Effect Measure

Effect Measure is a forum for progressive public health discussion and argument as well as a source of public health information from around the web that interests the Editor(s)

Search

Profile

The Editors of Effect Measure are senior public health scientists and practitioners. Paul Revere was a member of the first local Board of Health in the United States (Boston, 1799). The Editors sign their posts "Revere" to recognize the public service of a professional forerunner better known for other things.

Nation-approved.sml.jpg

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Categories

Archives

Public Health/Medical Links

Bird Flu Links

Other Links

Iraq

Group Efforts

Other Information

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Old Effect Measure site

Technorati Profile

« "Not unexpected" in swine flu is not unexpected | Main | Freethinker Sunday Sermonette: I guess I'll have to do it while I'm here »

Galileo in the Digital Age

Category: History, science
Posted on: November 28, 2009 6:52 AM, by revere

I sometimes wake up in the middle of the night and think about things. In fact I frequently have a problem with early waking. I think it's age related. In any event, one of the things I sometimes think about (mainly I think about my research or something connected with it, which is one reason why I have trouble going back to sleep) is what side of the great scientific controversies I'd be on. Like Galileo. Everyone thinks of his problem with the Church (allegedly) because he championed heliocentrism (the true story seems to be more political, complicated and nuanced, but I'll leave that for others). But what I think about is his claim that "objects in motion tend to remain in motion" -- which of course they don't, at least not that anyone on earth has seen. There's this little matter of friction, so no one had ever seen it happen. Would I have bought it? It was an inspired and fruitful abstraction and the cornerstone in one way or another of a good chunk of classical physics (Newton's First Law). I thought about it again today -- this time during my usual waking hours -- because of news reports that Galileo had finally entered the Digital Age. Literally.

I'm not talking about Galileo's ideas or his books or his image in pixels. I'm talking about Galileo in the form of his digits:

Two fingers cut from the hand of Italian astronomer Galileo nearly 300 years ago have been rediscovered more than a century after they were last seen, an Italian museum director said Monday.

They were purchased recently at an auction by a person who brought them to the Museum of the History of Science in Florence, suspecting what they were, museum director Paolo Galluzzi said.

Three fingers were cut from Galileo's hand in March 1737 when his body was moved from a temporary monument to its final resting place in Florence, Italy. The last tooth remaining in his lower jaw was also taken, Galluzzi said.

Two of the fingers and the tooth ended up in a sealed glass jar that disappeared sometime after 1905.

There had been "no trace" of them for more than 100 years until the person who bought them in the auction came to the museum recently. (Richard Allen Greene, CNN)



Removing body parts with special significance from famous figures, like saints, was a common practice. It's being speculated that these are the fingers he used to hold his mighty pen. It would be interesting to know if Casanova's corpse has all its parts intact. And let's face it. If someone is going to give you the finger, who better than Galileo? Certainly better than another driver whose car, once in motion, intends to remain in motion regardless of lane.

The museum already has a third Galilean finger and we should congratulate them on this coup. In fact, let's all give them a hand.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Medicine & Health

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/125725

Comments

1

The mystery no longer lingers:
Found, at last, two missing fingers.
They both belonged, as did one tooth,
To Galileo. That’s the truth.

The heretic had made a fuss
Supporting old Copernicus;
The Earth, he said, each year will run
An orbit 'round our yellow sun;

A statement, in The Church’s sight,
That could not possibly be right--
So Galileo swore he lied,
And nine years later, up and died.

Nine decades later, scientists
With strange things on their “must do” lists
Removed some fingers, teeth, and bones,
Then laid him back beneath the stones.

For years, his parts, though very old,
Were bartered, traded, bought and sold,
Until, in nineteen-hundred five,
Expected parts did not arrive.

The trading, then, went underground—
Until this year. Now, they’ve been found!
Next year, his fans may go and see ‘em
At Florence’s History of Science Museum.

http://digitalcuttlefish.blogspot.com/2009/11/galileo-galileo.html

Posted by: Cuttlefish | November 28, 2009 9:37 AM

2

Cuttlefish: LOL. Very, very impressive. Keep in motion. You could do verse.

After thought: It is truly motion in poetry.

Posted by: revere | November 28, 2009 10:18 AM

3

Ha! Great bookending of the piece.

Posted by: tymbuktu | November 28, 2009 3:18 PM

4

Since Galileo's parts have been honored in the above excellent verse, here's a limerick in a rather similiar vein (no pun intended) that's been around a while, on somewhat the same subject. Perhaps Casanova's unit is in the same place, as yet undiscovered.

In an old mausoleum colossal
An explorer discovered a fossil
He could tell by the bend
And the knob on the end
Twas the peeter of Paul the Apostle

Posted by: J. J. | November 28, 2009 5:13 PM

5

Nice, Cuttlefish and J.J.! And much more fun than the trollers' postings.
Well, these are from college days, but hey--
Descartes spent 16 hours in bed
and he feared the Dread Deceiver,
but God is there, spreading percepts everywhere,
So hoorah! for the Great Perceiver.
and--
Help, help, I'm an epsilon
enroute to my limit--can't I go on? [sometimes written as "must. . .?"]

Posted by: Paula | November 28, 2009 10:10 PM

6

Cuttlefish, have you some poetry elsewhere?

Posted by: Paula | November 28, 2009 10:13 PM

7

Cuttlefish lives here:
http://digitalcuttlefish.blogspot.com/
...and has a book out, which I unreservedly recommend.

Posted by: george.w | November 28, 2009 11:26 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.