Now on ScienceBlogs: HeartlandGate: Anti-Science Institute's Insider Reveals Secrets

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Effect Measure

Effect Measure is a forum for progressive public health discussion and argument as well as a source of public health information from around the web that interests the Editor(s)

Search

Profile

The Editors of Effect Measure are senior public health scientists and practitioners. Paul Revere was a member of the first local Board of Health in the United States (Boston, 1799). The Editors sign their posts "Revere" to recognize the public service of a professional forerunner better known for other things.

Nation-approved.sml.jpg

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Categories

Archives

Public Health/Medical Links

Bird Flu Links

Other Links

Iraq

Group Efforts

Other Information

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Old Effect Measure site

Technorati Profile

« Afghanistan: there is a road to peace | Main | Afghanistan: hollow log edition »

What's that smell?

Category: Food
Posted on: December 21, 2009 6:41 AM, by revere

I was well aware that food smells can make us hungry, but thought that the reverse -- smells taking our appetite away -- was limited to the ones that were nauseous or disgusting. Apparently that's not so. There are good tasting foods that simultaneously promote a feeling of fullness by stimulating nerves in back of the nasal area. Could this be used to control appetite in the war against obesity? Maybe I'm putting it too simplistically. I'll let the authors of a review in the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (R.M.A.J. Ruijschop, et al., ""Retronasal Aroma Release and Satiation: A Review", 57(21): pp 9888-9894) explain it in more scientific terms:

“The application of aroma in food product development for inducing satiation is promising and appealing,” according to its authors, led by Rianne Ruijschop from NIZO Food Research.

“Complementary to ingredients that focus on the postingestive and postabsorptive stage of the satiety cascade, retronasal aroma release, operating during food ingestion, has a consumer benefit that is immediately noticeable,” they added. (via Stephen Daniells, The Dairy Reporter):

Translation: you'll eat less. OK. There's a bit more to it, of course. The interesting science here has to do with what the appetite suppressing chemicals are, how they are released when eating (e.g., do you have to chew them to release them?), what areas of the brain are stimulated and how is that related to appetite suppression, etc. There are all sorts of methodological problems to be solved, too. For example, how do you administer a food's aroma independently from its ingredients and the texture and taste of foods?

This research hasn't gone very far but I believe it's a reasonable approach. It's been my experience there are some foods where just a little bit seems to "fill me up." I never thought about why. I assumed that foods high in fat (the ones we often call "rich" when there is a lot of cream in them, for example) were liked that because of the high fat content. It never occurred to me there might be alternative pathways at work I wasn't aware of.

The authors have been doing research on how organic acids from fermentation alter the extent of "retro-nasal aroma release," as does a food's physical structure. The article says that solid foods generate these aromas for a longer time than liquid products. There's obviously a broad and promising research area here and a lot of interesting problems in food engineering, a topic I know almost nothing about. If I knew more about it, I might put it like this:

“Among the proof-of-principle studies that were performed, the prolongation of the duration of retronasal aroma release, the addition of specific ingredient-related aroma cues, the engineering of more complex aroma compositions, and the adaptation of bite size or duration of oral processing may prove to be valuable aroma concepts for the development of foods containing triggers that induce or increase the feeling of satiation.

“The next challenge is to implement these concepts into real food products,” they concluded.

And the challenge after that? Making them taste good?

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Life ScienceTechnology

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/127579

Comments

1

A commercial product already exists. Look up SENSA. I am using it with limited success. But, hey, every little bit helps in the battle with weight.

Posted by: Brenda Gundry | December 21, 2009 9:22 AM

2

I always get/feel full faster when I eat cooked salmon. I wonder if this is why?

Posted by: mk | December 21, 2009 10:46 AM

3

After recovering from an injury that caused me to have anosmia (lack of sense of smell -- in my case from neurological damage), I noticed that my appetite seems significantly greater, and I wondered if the two were related. This seems to suggest that they are. Thanx for the article . . . .

Posted by: Don | December 21, 2009 12:33 PM

4

I wonder if common 'processed food' techniques (bleaching flour etc) inadvertently remove some of these aromatics? That might also contribute to 'the obesity epidemic'.

Perversely, marketers might think it is a 'good' thing if people have to eat/buy more of their product to feel full.

Posted by: Lisa the GP | December 21, 2009 4:24 PM

5

Visit any all-you-can-eat-buffet. After the first dish you are very nearly satiated. I always suspected pizza hut had some appetite suppressant/repellent growing up as a teenager- or was it the food?

Posted by: cassiopeia160 | December 21, 2009 9:13 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.