Now on ScienceBlogs: Pale Blue Dot

Seed Media Group

Next Generation Energy

Featuring the next generation of energy ideas

« The dark horse technology of the century: Thermoelectricity | Main | Sometimes, It's NOT The Motion Of The Ocean That Matters Most... »

Higher, higher, higher!

Category: Next Generation
Posted on: September 22, 2008 12:01 PM, by James Hrynyshyn

Everyone knows wind turbines will play a role in the energy mix of the near future. But ground-based turbine farms aren't the only way to turn atmospheric kinetic energy into electricity. Among the more imaginative alternatives to the fossilized status quo is the good old-fashioned kite.

This is actually not even a dark horse, at this point, I will concede. (I'm not talking about some Benjamin Franklin scheme involving lightning, as the painting suggests, although that, too, would be mighty powerful.) Indeed, it might strike some as one of the more out-there suggestions to grace these pages. I doubt kites will ever be delivering significant quantities of electrons to the grid. But as an example of the type of thinking we'll need to drag ourselves into the post-petroleum age, it's worth a few minutes of your day. Consider:

windspeed-netherlands.gifTypical wind velocities near the ground are measured in the single-digit kilometers per hour. They can get a bit stronger, but most wind turbines have to shut down when the wind really starts to blow. Which is a shame.

Higher up in the troposphere though, wind velocity is much greater. In the graph at right, taken from "Design and testing of a remotely controlled surfkite for the Laddermill" by Bas Lansdorp, B. Remes
and W.J. Ockels of Delft University in the Netherlands, we see that wind speeds in the air over Holland peak 10 km up at better than 45 knots. Wind up there also blows more reliably. So what would it take to exploit all that free kinetic energy?

A series of kites known as a "laddermill," of course. It's just one of several ideas floating around to exploit high-altitude winds. They all share the same basic concept, and as usual, someone else can explain it better than I. Here's Michael Brooks in New Scientist (sub. req'd) just a few weeks ago:

The basic idea is that, just as a yo-yo spins when its string unfurls, so an electrical generator can be driven by the pull of a kite's aerofoil.... the kite is flown on two tethers, each one held on a separate drum attached to a computer-controlled winch. Once the kite is launched and in stable flight and pulling on its tethers, the winches are released. The tethers then reel out, spinning the generators. When nearly the entire length of the tethers has unspooled, the winches are engaged to haul them back in, returning the kite to its original position.
How much power can such things generate? Well, since power is proportional to the cube of wind speed, in theory quite a lot. Though no one has successfully scaled up any of the tiny kilowatt-range prototypes, the Delft team optimistically predicts 50 megawatts for a full-size version of their experimental model. Even if the real output is closer to one tenth of that, we're still talking about something bigger than most existing wind turbines. And there really isn't a lot of fancy, expensive equipment to develop. Just very strong, very long strings, along with computers to handle them.

Again, we're not likely to see such stuff dominating our skies any time soon. But as with many other technologies, it might make sense in remote, lightly populated places with little competition for the airspace, and where running grid lines is too expensive. More important is the example kite power sets for others trying to dream up way to taking advantage of free kinetic energy, which is just another manifestation of solar energy, of course. It's all there for taking, if we can just put our minds to it.

At least, that's the kind of thoughts I entertain when I get depressed about our lack of progress on the clean energy tranformation challenge, and the rapidly dwindling window of opportunity remaining before it will make no difference.

Comments

1

Nots, knot km/hr. At least according to the x-axis label.

Posted by: Forty rods per hogshead | September 22, 2008 6:45 PM

2

I think the idea of using kites to pull ocean tankers/cargo ships deserves a mention here, which I seem to remember were supposed to save about 15% or so of the fuel on a large tanker. Don't have any references, sorry, just thought I'd throw that concept in here...

Posted by: Julius | September 23, 2008 4:47 AM

3

There is also a potential difference between an altitude of 10k and ground level. I don't know what it is exactly but it is a potential source of energy.

Posted by: Oldfart | September 23, 2008 7:39 AM

4

How does the lower air pressure up there affect things? ke is proportional to mass, after all.

And rather than a tether reeling in and out, perhaps some sort of system where the kite oscilates in place - sort of flaps. Of course, you will need a kite string that doesn't convert the energy to heat as it is stretched and released - a very stiff and eleastic one.

Posted by: Paul Murray | September 23, 2008 8:49 PM

5

We should mention Makani Power, here. Their scheme appears to involve delta wing kites with turbines on the trailing edges, flown in fast figure-eights to multiply the wind speed experienced by the turbines.

Posted by: Nathan Myers | September 24, 2008 6:02 AM

6

I think I'm missing something here (and it may be my brain!), but how much power is employed in the winches in retrieving the kite, and why is it that this doesn't negate the power obtained from the kite turning the generator in the first place?

It seems to me we're expecting something from nothing. Does the kite system somehow collapse when retrieved so it requires less energy to pull it back (presumably against the wind) than it gets from the wind tugging it out?

Posted by: Ian | September 26, 2008 1:09 PM

7

Reply to Ian | September 26, 2008 1:09 PM

It does, in fact, collapse. When the kites have reached maximum height, the kite wings reposition themselves so that they fly back to starting hight, which is downward so this wont cost any energy (exept energy used to reposition the wings). When they arrive at starting height, the wings go back to energy-capturing state, flying upwards.

Posted by: Colin | September 28, 2008 7:40 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM