Posted by I have finally gotten together enough to create a Google Earth image (below) of the location of the Saudi Arabian earthquakes and their depths/magnitudes. I only have the data from the USGS earthquake list, but it is very illuminating:
Harrat Lunayyir volcano in western Saudi Arabia from Google Earth with the current earthquakes shown on the image. Image courtesy of Google, earthquake data from the USGS. Click here to see a larger version.
The earthquakes look like this (all times are Universal Time):
Date Time Mag. Depth
5/17 19:50 M4.6 10 km
5/19 06:38 M4.9 10 km
5/19 16:54 M4.9 10 km
5/19 17:35 M5.7 7.6 km
5/19 19:57 M4.6 10 km
5/19 20:35 M4.6 10 km
There are likely a bunch of smaller events going on as well, but this is all the data I have on hand. Overall, the depth over the last few days doesn’t seem to be significantly changing (within the error of the depth estimates). I’m still not sure how this shows that magma is moving (according to some of the early quotes from Saudi Arabian officials)
UPDATE 11:45 AM Pacific: Just as I posted this, I saw this: Saudi Arabian officials have extended the emergency zone out 40 km from the earthquakes. No clear indication whether they are doing this out of fear of the seismicity or potential volcanic activity, but it definitely shows increasing concern.
Harrat Lunayyir is a lava field about which we honestly don’t know too much. It is relatively small compared to other lava fields in western Saudi Arabia, but some flows made it to the Red Sea, a distance of 50 km / 35 miles! In terms of previous eruptions, the only datum is a potential eruption around 1000 A.D., but beyond that, not too much. If you look at the image (above), you can see the dark black basaltic (or basanite) lava flows. You can also see the image is pockmocked with reddish dots – these are oxidized cinder cones, a very common feature of lava fields.
The fact that these earthquakes all seem to be centered under a known lava field should be a sign of concern. Without confirmation of some of the eyewitness accounts, there is still a chance that these might not be related to the lava field, but until we can get more information, we’re still left to speculate.
May 20, 2009
May 20, 2009
May 20, 2009
( The pattern doesn’t SEEM like tectonic quakes; don’t they usually tend to have a major shock followed by lesser aftershocks, rather than a series at similar magnitude? They’re mostly at the same depth, which doesn’t suggest magma rising (although the lesser events could, possibly, tell a different tale). Relief of crustal stress because of the mass of the volcanic structure? Hardly..this is no Fuji or Shasta. 
May 20, 2009
May 20, 2009
May 21, 2009
January 18, 2010
October 17, 2010
February 22, 2011
March 1, 2011
April 26, 2011
June 3, 2011
June 26, 2011
July 25, 2011
August 13, 2011
September 7, 2011
October 4, 2011
October 10, 2011
October 26, 2011
November 11, 2011
November 15, 2011
November 15, 2011
November 17, 2011
November 30, 2011