Via Dianna Narciso, one of the funniest/most pathetic excuse for a child-star-gone-wild: Atheist community service.

“Somewhere along this journey,” he says, “both mine and Miley’s faith has been shaken. That saddens me the most.” When they first came to Hollywood for Hannah Montana, the two of them would drive down the freeway together to the studio each morning, and every day Miley would point out the sign that said

ADOPT-A-HIGHWAY
ATHEISTS UNITED

Just before moving out to Los Angeles, the whole family had been baptized together by their pastor at the People’s Church in Franklin, Tennessee. “It was Tish’s idea,” he remembers. “She said, ‘We’re going to be under attack, and we have to be strong in our faith and we’re all going to be baptized…’” And there, driving to work each day in the City of Angels, was this sign. “A physical sign. It could have easily said ‘You will now be attacked by Satan.’ ‘Entering this industry, you are now on the highway to darkness…’”

You heard em, Atheists! You wanna get smashed out of your gourd with Justin Bieber and throw a TV out a hotel window? Steal your friends dads car and lead a parade through Chicago with Dakota Fanning? Wanna go partying wearing short skirts and get your cooch on TMZ with Abigail Breslin OH AND THEN GO SHAVE YOUR HEADS?

ADOPT MORE HIGHWAYS!

OKC Atheists is volunteering at the regional food bank this Saturday (we do this all the time).

HUZZAH!

PARTY IN THE USA!

BRC, youre a pathetic twat who cant take responsibility for your own actions, so you blame things on ‘God’ or ‘Satan’ or ‘Destiny’, but I still love ya:

Comments

  1. #1 William Wallace
    February 16, 2011

    I was just thinking, instead of picking on Christians, an HIV researcher/activist might want to blog on the type of degenerate scum who spread HIV.

  2. #2 minimalist
    February 16, 2011

    But Wally, she already has!

  3. #3 Hercules Grytpype-Thynne
    February 16, 2011

    Heh. As though picking on Christians and blogging about degenerate scum were mutually exclusive.

    And no, I don’t mean that they’re exactly the same thing.

  4. #4 William Wallace
    February 16, 2011

    minimalist, great, used condemns and hypodermic needles at elementary school playgrounds, just what we need.

    Okay, condoms and clean needle *exchanges* are okay, I suppose.

    But abstinence (from pre-marital sex and recreational intravenous drug use) is far more effective.

    But oh, wait, that’s what most Christians say. Never mind.

  5. #5 rnb
    February 17, 2011

    If you really want to be safe you need to continue abstinence after you are married. Especially if your spouse is Newt Gingrich.

  6. #6 Prometheus
    February 17, 2011

    “Adopt a Highway” lacks much of the poetry of “Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch’intrate” but it is Hollywood.

    If god’s most beautiful dark angel is reduced to the seduction of teenage hillbillies then I suppose the old Burma Shave gag is apropos.

    Know your audience.

  7. #7 minimalist
    February 17, 2011

    Wall, while your reply was delightfully loopy as usual, it missed the point (also as usual). Fine, time to explain the jokes to the terminally thick. Again.

    Junkies (who may or may not have AIDS) leaving needles (which Kay oft may not even have active virus) lying around affects the few kids dumb enough to play with them.

    The degenerate child-molesting organization known as the Catholic Church potentially affects millions in Africa due to their lies about condoms and AIDS.

    Priorities, you doof.

  8. #8 Kemanorel
    February 17, 2011

    minimalist, great, used condemns and hypodermic needles at elementary school playgrounds, just what we need.

    Okay, condoms and clean needle *exchanges* are okay, I suppose.

    But abstinence (from pre-marital sex and recreational intravenous drug use) is far more effective.

    But oh, wait, that’s what most Christians say. Never mind.

    And they also say this: http://legis.state.sd.us/sessions/2011/Bill.aspx?File=HB1171HJU.htm

    Amendment to the law in bold:

    FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to expand the definition of justifiable homicide to provide for the protection of certain unborn children.
    BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA:
    Section 1. That § 22-16-34 be amended to read as follows:
    22-16-34. Homicide is justifiable if committed by any person while resisting any attempt to murder such person, or to harm the unborn child of such person in a manner and to a degree likely to result in the death of the unborn child, or to commit any felony upon him or her, or upon or in any dwelling house in which such person is.
    Section 2. That § 22-16-35 be amended to read as follows:
    22-16-35. Homicide is justifiable if committed by any person in the lawful defense of such person, or of his or her husband, wife, parent, child, master, mistress, or servant, or the unborn child of any such enumerated person, if there is reasonable ground to apprehend a design to commit a felony, or to do some great personal injury, and imminent danger of such design being
    accomplished.

    Nothing like Christians essentially trying to change a law to declair open season on doctors to get your point across, eh, Willy Wallace?

  9. #9 William Wallace
    February 17, 2011

    Nothing like Christians essentially trying to change a law to declair open season on doctors to get your point across

    I just don’t know why you’d call somebody who earns a livelihood extirpating unborn children a “doctor”. At the very real risk of some MSNBC automaton typing “Goodwin,” along with some obscenities (and feeling all intelligent for their name it and run response) it seems an awful like claiming war crimes trials against gas chamber operators are just witch trials against chemical engineers.

  10. #10 Mithrandir
    February 17, 2011

    I just don’t know why you’d call somebody who earns a livelihood extirpating unborn children a “doctor”.

    We’re not, we’re calling abortion providers doctors.

  11. #11 jaranath
    February 17, 2011

    Wow. Willywally is still around? That’s a little sad.

  12. #12 MI Dawn
    February 18, 2011

    @William Wallace: When you are able to become pregnant, then YOU may make the choice of what to do with the fetus you are pregnant with. Until that time, let the woman who is pregnant, in conjuntion with her health care provider, decide what is best for her – carrying the baby to term and raising it, adoption, or abortion. You cannot make that choice for her, so please stop trying to do so.

  13. #13 Prometheus
    February 18, 2011

    Degeneracy of celebrity youth, blamed on atheist club community service projects is the topic.

    Not WW’s fetus fetish screed about extirpated murderdeathkill of the preunbornded babby eeenfant jeebuses.

    Can we put this trolley back on the rails?

  14. #14 Kemanorel
    February 18, 2011

    I just don’t know why you’d call somebody who earns a livelihood extirpating unborn children a “doctor”.

    Because they have a medical degree and help women make in informed decision about their health.

    Since when do you get to decide who’s a doctor or not?

  15. #15 TomZ
    February 18, 2011

    BillyRayDumbass said: “A physical sign.”

    Yup, and if your specific all-awesomeness creator could’ve left a sign, or any evidence of any kind, even a sliver, instead of you know NONE AT ALL, maybe there’d be some clarity or justification for the god-position.

    And can we get an explanation on how a group can cover a culture in “darkness” by adopting a highway?!?! Or is it, in Billy’s mind, indicative of how “dark” that culture is, like “Oh NOES!!1! Itz scaree here cauze theyz picks up LITTER! And I NeeDZ MY KITTEH LITTER!”

  16. #16 Tommykey
    February 18, 2011

    I just don’t know why you’d call somebody who earns a livelihood extirpating unborn children a “doctor”.

    Because the pregnant woman is the patient you dumbass!

    To quote Andy Dufresne from Shawshank Redemption, “How can you be so obtuse?”

  17. #17 R2
    February 18, 2011

    William Wallace (if that even is his REAL name) does have a point! Absitenence is the best policy to prevent STDs. That’s why I think safe sex should be taught. There is so much fun to be had with kissing, making out, mutual masturbation, dry humping and whatever you can imagine that does not make membranes or fluids contact other membranes.

    All the fun + no risk of STDs.

    If those social conservatives really care about health and not slut shaming, they should be in favor of this being taught.

  18. #18 Grendels Dad
    February 21, 2011

    Uh, yeah. The idea of people who don’t share his faith picking up trash by the side of a road must have been terrifying. I know I often equate strangers doing a good deed with imminent attack by mythological creatures. Doesn’t everyone?