Janet D. Stemwedel (whose nom de blog is Dr. Free-Ride) is an assistant professor of philosophy at San Jose State University. Before becoming a philosopher, she earned a Ph.D. in physical chemistry. Email her at dr.freeride@gmail.com.
This tool uses an algorithm to guess whether the chunk of text you enter into the text box was written by a male or a female. What do you suppose it thought about my writing?
It depends on the post. For example this post got:
Female Score: 1616 Male Score: 1380
which is to say, "FEMALE", while this post got:
Female Score: 3271 Male Score: 4308
which is to say, "MALE".
Who knew I was so versatile?
The algorithm seems to be based on tracking frequencies of words that, apparently, are more commonly used by females (with, if, not, where, be, when, your, her, we, should, she, and, me, myself, hers, was) compared to those more commonly used by males (around, what, more, are, as, who, below, is, these, the, a, at, it, many, said, above, to). I have no idea whether these frequencies really go the way the algorithm says they do or whether the algorithm rests on stereotypes that don't have a basis in fact. And, I wonder how much of an influence one's training to write in a particular field (say, physical chemistry or analytic philosophy) has on the frequency with which one uses the "gendered" words tracked by the algorithm. (Notice that "should" is in the female set and "is" is in the male set? Clearly ethics is where you'll find most of the women in philosophy ... or not.)
Rather than wonder too hard, I'm going to take a moment to bask in my communicative androgyny.
Comments
Not sure if you got this idea from here or not, but if you didn't, you'll find in the comment thread a few philosophers have put their writing into the Genie, and also a link to discussion/criticism of the algorithim on another blog.
I thought it was interesting that the men in philosohy represented in the thread were "female" from the Genie, and the women were "male." For what it's worth, I turn out strongly male in the results. (I am female.)
Posted by: ck | April 25, 2007 9:10 AM
You want androgyny?? Try this ...
Posted by: Scott Belyea | April 25, 2007 9:46 AM
I'm male, but the algorithm identifies my blog writing as female.
Personally I find the "word usage" measure to be a bit suspect, especially considering that the words in question are so basic. The notions that women use "and" more than men but men use more articles ("a" and "the") strike me as absurd. How can women write without articles?
Posted by: Paul | April 25, 2007 11:08 AM
I write fiction like a girl but blogging and nonfiction like a boy. ;)
Posted by: Kevin W. Parker | April 25, 2007 11:17 AM
Neither, you write like a mom.
Posted by: Alan Kellogg | April 25, 2007 9:28 PM
you write like a mom
Well, given that a mom is frequently called on to be all things to all people, I suppose that makes some sense.
Posted by: Janet D. Stemwedel | April 25, 2007 9:33 PM
Even posts where I am discussing quintesentially female things (like breastfeeding in seminars), I write like a man. I am female, and the person who taught me to write well is a female. I think it's nonsensical.
Posted by: sciencewoman | April 25, 2007 10:19 PM
I'm guessing girl because of your name but then I'm pretty shrewd that way...
Posted by: Pauline Martin | April 25, 2007 10:59 PM
Interesting test:
Constitution of the United States sans amendments:
Female Score: 4964
Male Score: 4715
The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!
Amendments only:
Female Score: 2649
Male Score: 3986
The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: male!
Posted by: Bill H | April 26, 2007 3:33 AM
this algorithm seems familiar -- wait a minute -----
"Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people." -- Eleanor Roosevelt
and now let's put that in the gender genie, and,
heh.
Posted by: hibiscus | April 26, 2007 1:40 PM
Small minds discuss sports.
Posted by: Phoebe Love | April 27, 2007 5:09 PM
I just started reading your blog. Not sure how I got to it, I think it was linked from something else I read. Anyway, since i'm avoiding more constructive tasks by searching the archives, I thought i'd test some of my blog postings. I'm a female, but the tool didn't seem entirely sure.
A post I wrote about why the Temple University College of Education is good was rated as male. Where as, a post I wrote detailing the clever behavior plan I suggested for a student I work with, and an experiment on the effects of diet on the growth rates of corn snakes that I would like to conduct, was rated as female. Maybe it's just me, but I would have thought the snake experiment would be more of a male thing.
Posted by: Jen | May 26, 2007 4:45 PM