Now on ScienceBlogs: What's the difference between HeLa and HeLa S3 cells?
Part III: Theodore "Ted" Puck, MD, and the first clonal isolation of human tumor cells

Search

Profile

Janet D. Stemwedel (whose nom de blog is Dr. Free-Ride) is an associate professor of philosophy at San Jose State University. Before becoming a philosopher, she earned a Ph.D. in physical chemistry. Email her at dr.freeride@gmail.com.

Brain-Friendly Giftables

Having a family and an academic career

Sb/DonorsChoose Drive

DonorsChoose.org - Support public schools today! - Go

Follow docfreeride on Twitter

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Categories

Archives

Where I'm coming from

Chemistry

Physics, Astronomy

Biology

Paleontology

Ecology

Math, Logic, Statistics

Psychology, Neuroscience

Geoscience

Engineering, Computer Science

Information, Technology

Medicos

Slaving in the lab

Science meets real life

Science and skepticism

Science meets art, literature, culture

Science and ethics

History of Science

Philosophy Blogs

Other Academic Blogs

Non-Academic Blogs I Like

Other Information

Add Adventures in Ethics and Science to your Technorati Favorites!

Add Scienceblogs to your Technorati Favorites!

« Whistleblowing: the community's response. | Main | Department of Homeland Security and academic labs. »

Why you shouldn't marry your preschool sweetheart.

Category: Passing thoughts
Posted on: June 6, 2007 7:54 PM, by Janet D. Stemwedel

My better half dropped a comic strip conspiracy theory on me last night. Usually I don't lend any credence to such theories, but this one has the ring of truth to it.


You know the one-panel strip "Love Is ..." that's been syndicated since 1970?

The one that Homer Simpson described as being "about two naked eight-year-olds who are married"?

Do you ever wonder what might have become of those married former eight-year-olds?

(For that matter, did you ever notice how much alike those naked eight-year-olds looked?)


Brace yourself.

My better half's theory is that the "Love Is ..." kids grew up to be ...

The Lockhorns!


The honeymoon has to end at some point, and I suppose if you marry at eight, that point is well before 20.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/42428

Comments

1

This reminds me of how a relationship has three phases:

1. "Darling!"

2. "Dear!"

3. "Hey you!"

Posted by: Thinker | June 7, 2007 2:53 AM

2

Hmmm. After all these years, they still don't have secondary sexual characteristics, except stubble. It must be the same couple. And they aren't any funnier...

Posted by: John McKay | June 7, 2007 3:08 AM

3

The lack of primary sexual characteristics does a good job of explaining the lack of secondary sexual characteristics.

Posted by: Alan Kellogg | June 7, 2007 8:17 PM

4

I REALLY LOVE! LOVE IS.. I COLLECT LOVE IS I HAD OVER 200 LOVE IS..! AND IV BEEN COLLECTING LOVE IS.. 4 A YEAR IN A HALF NOW. BUT SOME ONE STOLE IT AND NOW I WAISTED MY TIME BUT I STILL HAVE MY MEMORIES

Posted by: JAQUAISHA | August 8, 2008 8:26 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Collective Imagination
Enter to win the daily giveaway
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.