Now on ScienceBlogs: The Galaxy's Biggest Valentine

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Search

Profile

Janet D. Stemwedel (whose nom de blog is Dr. Free-Ride) is an associate professor of philosophy at San Jose State University. Before becoming a philosopher, she earned a Ph.D. in physical chemistry. Email her at dr.freeride@gmail.com.

Brain-Friendly Giftables

Having a family and an academic career

Sb/DonorsChoose Drive

DonorsChoose.org - Support public schools today! - Go

Follow docfreeride on Twitter

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Categories

Archives

Where I'm coming from

Chemistry

Physics, Astronomy

Biology

Paleontology

Ecology

Math, Logic, Statistics

Psychology, Neuroscience

Geoscience

Engineering, Computer Science

Information, Technology

Medicos

Slaving in the lab

Science meets real life

Science and skepticism

Science meets art, literature, culture

Science and ethics

History of Science

Philosophy Blogs

Other Academic Blogs

Non-Academic Blogs I Like

Other Information

Add Adventures in Ethics and Science to your Technorati Favorites!

Add Scienceblogs to your Technorati Favorites!

« Happy Caturday! | Main | Basic concepts: refrigeration. »

Some questions about the cadaver calculator.

Posted on: July 22, 2007 2:15 PM, by Janet D. Stemwedel

Orac's calculated value (if he shuffled off this mortal coil in his present state -- and I really hope he doesn't) piqued my curiosity and led me to calculate the value of my own potential cadaver. But the calculated value leaves me curious about the assumptions underpinning the calculation.

First, my results:

$4875.00The Cadaver Calculator - Find out how much your body is worth. From Mingle2 - Free Online Dating

(Hey, my corpse is worth more than Orac's, to the tune of $1285!)

Now, the questions:

  1. Is the underlying assumption that the value of my cadaver would come primarily from transplantable tissue? (That would explain the questions about vision, major surgeries, medications, and the like.)
  2. Given that, strictly speaking, human organs are not supposed to be sold, how do they establish the monetary value of transplantable organs?
  3. Are there circumstances in which a cadaver's value as a cadaver (to be used in the instruction of medical students, for example) would exceed its value as a source of transplantable tissue? (If so, in what circumstances?)
  4. Are there any other ways to peg the monetary value of a cadaver that the quiz makers could have used here (e.g., its value to a funeral director selling burial services -- although, in that instance, my age and present state of health would probably be less relevant than my preferred method of disposal).

It's like Socrates said: The unexamined online quiz isn't worth taking.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/46281

Comments

1

I can only really speak to question three here, but I would say it is a definite yes. I think the quiz even asks if you have any rare or weird diseases or disorders, which I assume means that it would help the study of those diseases or disorders more if you were the subject of study.

Posted by: coathangrrr | July 22, 2007 3:31 PM

2

As my mom always said when I was collecting baseball cards, its only worth that much if someone actually will pay it. My cadaver ended up being $4090. If you have a baseball card with a listed value of $500, but someone will only pay $50, is it really worth $500?

Posted by: Jordan | July 22, 2007 4:17 PM

3

I think being offiically obese helpsd. :)

Thing is, I'm not a normal obese person. Heart's normal, blood vessels are clear, cholesterol is actually low. If the quiz took things like that into account I'd be worth more.

Then you have the matter of age. The longer you last the more your body is worth.

Try this, take the quiz again, but select the oldest age range. See how much your carcass is worth then.

Posted by: Alan Kellogg | July 23, 2007 1:53 AM

4

This calls for rational testing! We need a selfless science blogger (or loyal commenter) to donate their body for purposes of sale. Proceeds to charity, of course - this must be a non-profit venture.

Posted by: outeast | July 23, 2007 9:45 AM

5

I'm worth $5075 when dead. Interesting.

Posted by: JM | July 23, 2007 1:31 PM

6

I couldn't find a "Sell Now" button, and somehow Google AdSense is failing to populate the page with ads from interested companies that want to be buyers.

I suppose there would be liability issues if they didn't have an advance proof of willingness to be, er, sold off.

Perhaps one has to subcontract this through some organized group like the undertakers/funeral directors instead of contracting for a direct sale?

Posted by: Hank Roberts | July 23, 2007 1:57 PM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.