Now on ScienceBlogs: Attack of the pregnant cannibal fathers

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Search

Profile

Janet D. Stemwedel (whose nom de blog is Dr. Free-Ride) is an associate professor of philosophy at San Jose State University. Before becoming a philosopher, she earned a Ph.D. in physical chemistry. Email her at dr.freeride@gmail.com.

Brain-Friendly Giftables

Having a family and an academic career

Sb/DonorsChoose Drive

Widget doesn't work? Here's my giving page. Thanks!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Categories

Archives

Where I'm coming from

Chemistry

Physics, Astronomy

Biology

Paleontology

Ecology

Math, Logic, Statistics

Psychology, Neuroscience

Geoscience

Engineering, Computer Science

Information, Technology

Medicos

Slaving in the lab

Science meets real life

Science and skepticism

Science meets art, literature, culture

Science and ethics

History of Science

Philosophy Blogs

Other Academic Blogs

Non-Academic Blogs I Like

Other Information

Add Adventures in Ethics and Science to your Technorati Favorites!

Add Scienceblogs to your Technorati Favorites!

« Unscientific America: Is the (new) media to blame? | Main | Friday Sprog Blogging: revisiting Pluto. »

Thursday sprog art.

Category: CrittersKids and science
Posted on: July 16, 2009 2:41 PM, by Janet D. Stemwedel

As I thrash my way through composing my last anticipated post on Unscientific America, I reckoned it was time to give you some more pictures to go with all the words. Thank goodness for the Free-Ride offspring!

From the younger Free-Ride offspring:

YOPicture3.jpg

I am fairly sure the blue squiggles in the background are actually just background squiggles rather than stink-lines coming off of that bird. If anything smells in this composition, you'd expect it would be the flowers.

From the elder Free-Ride offspring:

EOPicture3.jpg

The elder Free-Ride offspring calls this drawing "Quality versus Quantity." Originally, my better half and I interpreted quantity to refer to the amount of fish flesh (by weight) that each cat in the picture has, but it turns out the artist meant quantity to refer to the number of fish each cat has (with quality referring to how much fish flesh in each of those fish). One of those places where artistic intent and the viewer's interpretation diverge, I suppose.

Humanities & Social Science

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/115034

Comments

1

These are lovely. May I purchase an original piece for my dining room?

Posted by: Isis the Scientist | July 16, 2009 7:13 PM

2

Love the bird in particular. Love your blog. Very curious to read your next post. I think your responses to UA have been probably the best I've read yet.

Posted by: Faust | July 16, 2009 9:34 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM