Adventures in Ethics and Science

The Free-Ride offspring are currently summering (for a couple weeks, anyway) with The Grandparents Who Lurk But Seldom Comment. Practically, this means the conversations between Free-Ride offspring and parents over the past week have been brief and focused on how awesome day camp is.

I have, however, taken steps to ensure that while I am deprived of the physical presence of my offspring, you will not be deprived of the weekly installment of sprog blogging. To this end, I gave each of the sprogs a book to read during their visit with their grandparents and asked them to report back on their books via email.

Of course, I forgot to issue a mid-week reminder.

Nonetheless, the elder Free-Ride offspring was prepared to deliver a report on this book:

i-52f11a367bc01968c27e679f3190d78c-Mummies.jpg

Mummies, Bones, and Body Parts
By Charlotte Wilcox
 
What I learned:

1: Mummies can be naturally created or man-made.
2: Carbon dating is often inaccurate. [I assume this inaccuracy is with respect to the typical age of the mummies being dated. Maybe it’s a consequence of the mummification process? I’ll need to ask the elder Free-Ride offspring about this.]
3: Natural mummification can happen in a bog.
4: Sacrifices were sometimes mummified.
5: Preserved body tissue might tell scientists how someone died.
6: Bones stay preserved better than body tissue.
7: People sometimes use mummies as decoration or for anatomical demonstrations.
8: Noblepeople were often mummified when they died.
9: Most mummies are sent to museums.
10: Preserved lung tissue looks disturbing. XP [Emoticon in original.]

 
What I want to know:

1: How did people learn how to mummify others?
2: Why did people sacrifice children to their “Gods”? [Scare-quotes in original]
3: Who (or what) was the first person mummified?
4: Why do grave robbers sell creepy preserved things? [I’m guessing capitalism.]
5: Why does preserved lung tissue look like 2-year-old lasagna? [How does my child know what 2-year-old lasagna looks like?]

Major props to the elder offspring for doing blog-homework without any prodding. This sets the bar pretty high for the younger offspring next week.

Comments

  1. #1 bytz
    June 25, 2010

    “… often inaccurate…” sounds like a loaded or misleading phrase. It may be that this refers to the date range of the dating i.e. +/- 100 years or the x% error chance or something similar. I’d suggest having elder Free-Ride define what was meant by this.

    Ask C14 dating is generally good for up to around 50,000 years or so, dating a mummy (around 4000 years, more or less, for Egyptian mummies) should not be a problem.

    I can’t think of anything in the mummification process that would alter the carbon-14 content and there is nothing that will alter its decay rate.

  2. #2 daedalus2u
    June 25, 2010

    That is a good question. Usually the “science experiments” that result in first person observations of 2 year old lasagna occur when an individual has their first apartment.

  3. #3 J-Dog
    June 25, 2010

    Beautiful post – especially the two year old lasagna imagery.

    Re: Carbon dating comment- Just hope that the author doesn’t want to “teach the controversy”, which would open up a can of worms with a huge ick factor.

  4. #4 RMD
    June 25, 2010

    We’re borrowing the Sprogs for a sleepover this weekend and promise to give them a hefty dose of backyard botany, kitchen chemistry and bocce to supplement the reading material…

  5. #5 stripey_cat
    June 25, 2010

    I suspect that if you’re talking about bog bodies, environmental contamination from the peat is a real issue. So not a problem with carbon dating in principle, but a difficulty in obtaining clean samples.

  6. #6 Dario Ringach
    June 25, 2010

    If ever in central Mexico, visit the Mummies of Guanajuato:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_xv-aQWqvM

    …although I am not sure this one visit is for the kids.

  7. #7 Jim Thomerson
    June 25, 2010

    Have you seen this about radiocarbon dating?
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/06/100617143926.htm

  8. #8 Dario Ringach
    June 28, 2010

    Closer to home — California Science Center, opening on July 1st:

    Mummies of the world:

    http://www.californiasciencecenter.org/Exhibits/SpecialExhibits/mummies/mummies.php

    …there is also an IMAX film to go with it.


    Dario

The site is currently under maintenance and will be back shortly. New comments have been disabled during this time, please check back soon.