Dismal, yes, but is it science?
Category: Current events
Just what kind of science economics is presumed to be?
Posted by Janet D. Stemwedel at 8:43 PM • 16 Comments • 0 TrackBacks
Now on ScienceBlogs: Casual Fridays: What makes a good writer, and what motivates them?
Janet D. Stemwedel (whose nom de blog is Dr. Free-Ride) is an associate professor of philosophy at San Jose State University. Before becoming a philosopher, she earned a Ph.D. in physical chemistry. Email her at dr.freeride@gmail.com.
Widget doesn't work? Here's my giving page. Thanks!
Blog carnivals I enjoy:
Add Adventures in Ethics and Science to your Technorati Favorites!
Category: Current events
Just what kind of science economics is presumed to be?
Posted by Janet D. Stemwedel at 8:43 PM • 16 Comments • 0 TrackBacks
In the 12 September, 2008 issue of Science, there is a brief article titled "Do We Need 'Synthetic Bioethics'?" [1]. The authors, Hastings Center ethicists Erik Parens, Josephine Johnston, and Jacob Moses, answer: no....
Posted by Janet D. Stemwedel at 12:52 PM • 0 Comments • 0 TrackBacks
Reading the comments on my post and Chad's post about the different societal attitudes towards humanities and arts and math and science (especially in terms of what "basic" knowledge a well-educated person ought to have), I get the feeling that...
Posted by Janet D. Stemwedel at 4:46 PM • 25 Comments • 0 TrackBacks
Over at Philosopher's Playground, Steve Gimbel asks why the philosophy of chemistry is such a recent discipline given how long there has been serious activity in the philosophy of biology and the philosophy of physics. He floats a few possible...
Posted by Janet D. Stemwedel at 10:13 PM • 12 Comments • 0 TrackBacks
Via Crooked Timber, I see that philosopher Simon Blackburn would like to dispel some myths. (He does this in the inaugural article of a Times Higher Education series "in which academics range beyond their area of expertise".) Of the ten...
Posted by Janet D. Stemwedel at 5:35 PM • 34 Comments • 0 TrackBacks
Are some scientific disciplines more populated with shady characters than others?
Posted by Janet D. Stemwedel at 12:42 PM • 13 Comments • 0 TrackBacks
It's been pretty quiet here. Not only have I been engrossed in preparations for the Spring semester (classes start today), but I also went to the 2008 NC Science Blogging Conference. So it seems like a good time to ruminate...
Posted by Janet D. Stemwedel at 1:36 PM • 0 Comments • 0 TrackBacks
Following up on the earlier discussion here and at Chad's about the "fundamental difference" between chemistry and physics, I wanted to have a look at a historical moment that might provide some insight into the mood along the border between...
Posted by Janet D. Stemwedel at 11:03 PM • 1 Comments • 0 TrackBacks
Over at Uncertain Principles, Chad Orzel tries to explain the fundamental difference between physics and chemistry: My take on this particular question is that there's a whole hierarchy of (sub)fields, based on what level of abstraction you work at. The...
Posted by Janet D. Stemwedel at 5:33 PM • 6 Comments • 0 TrackBacks
This New York Times op-ed, to be precise. My questions for Paul Davies can be boiled down to these two: What kinds of explanations, precisely, are you asking science to deliver to you? Just why do you think it is...
Posted by Janet D. Stemwedel at 5:12 PM • 23 Comments • 0 TrackBacks
Neurophilosophy 11.19.2009
The Island of Doubt 11.20.2009
Greg Laden's Blog 11.20.2009
The World's Fair 11.19.2009
Laelaps 11.20.2009