1. evolgen
  2. Junkity Junk McJunkerson

Junkity Junk McJunkerson

By evolgen on April 4, 2006.

I previously alluded to Junk Non-coding DNA evolving into a gene in my last post on junk DNA. Here is another example of this phenomenon:

Scientists at the University of Illinois have discovered an antifreeze-protein gene in cod that has evolved from non-coding or 'junk' DNA.

...

"This appears to be a new mechanism for the evolution of a gene from non-coding DNA", says Professor Cheng, "3.5 billion years of evolution of life has produced many coding genes and conventional thinking assumes that new genes must come from pre-existing ones because the probability of a random stretch of DNA somehow becoming a functional gene is very low if not nil. This cod antifreeze gene might be an exception to this because it consists of a short repetitive sequence that only needs to be duplicated four times to give a fully functioning protein".

This antifreeze gene and the Drosophila Acp's I mentioned previously have one thing in common: they encode short proteins. This brief report does not specify how short the repetitive sequence is, but Acp's are less than 50 amino acids (150 nucleotides) long. Research into their origins may shed light on the evolution of the first protein coding genes.

Tags
Molecular Evolution

More like this

Junk DNA Redux
My little screed on junk DNA elicited some good feedback, including a comment from Dan Graur. In a somewhat ill-thought out rant, I implied that anyone who uses the term 'junk DNA' should be ostracized from the scientific community (or something along those lines). I restated my opinion in a far…
The Mutiny Down Below
Judging from fossils and studies on DNA, the common ancestor of humans, chimpanzees, and bonobos lived roughly six million years ago. Hominids inherited the genome of that ancestor, and over time it evolved into the human genome. A major force driving that change was natural selection: a mutant…
Testability 3.0
In a recent posting, Rusty answers me once again on the issue of testability. He proposes an actual test for both creationism and evolution. This is what he says: But in the strictest sense of the term testability, a falsifiable prediction must be made in order for a scientific theory to be…
And the award for the fastest-evolving piece of human DNA goes to...
The textbook explanation of DNA goes something like this: enzymes in our cells read a stretch of DNA and convert its code into a single-stranded RNA molecule, which is then used by ribosomes as a template for building a protein. That stretch of DNA biologists call a gene. The protein it encodes…