Nicholas Wade's Parasites

The New York Times has published an article in their Science section on the evolution of human parasites, and it's not by Carl Zimmer. In the article, Nicholas Wade (another good science writer at the NYTimes) presents a few vignettes of human-parasite co-evolution, including a bacterium that causes tooth decay, the ulcer causing Heliobacter, and a tapeworm we share with pigs. I guess Carl called dibs on the pubic lice. Anyway, Wade made me smile when he presented the phylogeography of one human parasite:

The latest organism to be identified as a longtime member of the human biota club is Streptococcus mutans, the bacterium that causes tooth decay. From samples collected around the world, Dr. Page W. Caufield and colleagues at New York University have found that the bacterium can be assigned by its DNA to several distinct lineages. One is found in Africans, one in Asians and a third in Caucasians (the people of Europe, the Near East and India), his team reported in last month's Journal of Bacteriology.

Rather than use the term Caucasian and assume the readers know what he means, Wade briefly defines it. And he doesn't refer to them as "ethnic groups" either. But, while the grouping of Europeans, Middle Easterners, and Indians into a single macro-population may reflect a shared ancestry, naming them Caucasians still bothers me. Can we come up with a better term for this group of people?

More like this

A few months ago a friend tipped me off to the fact that David Reich was going to publish a paper about the genetics of Indians which he ascertained was going to model these populations as hybrids between "Europeans and Andaman Islanders." The paper is out, and my friend was roughly right.…
If pubic lice are not the sort of thing you want to be seen reading about, let me give you the opportunity to close your browser window right now. But if you're at all curious about the secret that pubic lice have been keeping for over three million years, the tale of a mysterious liaison between…
About six months ago I had a post up on the Cape Coloureds of South Africa. As a reminder, the Cape Coloureds are a mixed-race population who are the plural majority in the southwestern Cape region of South Africa. Like the white Boers they are a mostly Afrikaans speaking population who are…
It almost seems like there are two separate research project under way regarding the evolutionary history of Homo sapiens. One focuses on recent humans, tends to use DNA as a major source of information, and from this base projects back into the past. This approach tends to confirm the idea that…

Mesoterranian?

By speedwell (not verified) on 13 Mar 2007 #permalink

What's wrong with "Indo-European"...

Nothing. That one works for me.

Yes, Indo-European works for me too, but it seems not to be favoured because it is used as a group label for origin of languages and it is not a one-to-one correspondence - not all Indo-European people speak an Indo-European-derived language, obviously.

Like I care - Indo-European has to be better than Caucasian, and it is more descriptive/specific and no more confusing than Eurasian, when that is commonly understood by the man in the street to mean someone of mixed European and Asian ancestry.