evolgen

New Gene Makes Flies Less Gay

We all know that Drosophila are the gayest bunch of gays that ever gayed up genetics. This is especially true when you create mutations in fruitless (nee fruity), “the gay gene”. Male flies with mutations in fruitless will try to get it on with other males (e.g., doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81802-4). That’s gay!

i-fa5a4e267e81a6674e47b694971739c3-Dai_etal_2008_fig3c.JPG

But fruitless is an old school gene that needs to be fucked up to turn the flies gay (doi:10.1093/molbev/msj070; the first author on that paper is, I shit you not, named Gailey). Drosophila really aren’t as gay as they are made to appear in the articles describing fruitless mutants. But the males are still kind of in to dudes, as is shown by a new paper from Manyuan Long’s group (doi:10.1073/pnas.0800693105).

Long’s group previously described an RNA gene that is unique to D. melanogaster, and not found in any of its sibling species (doi:10.1073/pnas.072066399). The gene, named sphinx, arose when the transcript of its parent gene was reverse transcribed and inserted back into the genome (in a process known as retroposition). It has also evolved quite rapidly, suggesting it was acted on by natural selection. Additionally, there are male-specific and a female-specific transcripts of sphinx.

So, there is probably some evolution story to unravel about the sphinx gene. In the new paper by Dai et al., Long and colleagues have performed a functional analysis of sphinx, and what they found was quite interesting. Via an analysis of flies carrying mutant forms of sphinx, they were able to show that the gene plays a role in preventing males from courting other males. Males carrying two mutant copies of sphinx spend more time courting other males than flies with a good copy of sphinx.

i-9fce889c009abc1168e5404291cadea3-Dai_etal_2008_fig3a.JPG

Here’s where you ask: but sphinx is a new gene — what about the close relatives who don’t have any copies of sphinx? Well, they’re gayer than D. melanogaster. When wild type flies are compared, males from the other species all spend more time courting other males than do D. melanogaster males, suggesting that the sphinx gene keeps D. melanogaster males from being as gay as their close relatives.

i-be5c50a8f14215ba6fd47ad8b7cee9c8-Dai_etal_2008_fig4a.gif

This would be a great opportunity to test genetic engineering for the “correction” of teh gay. You see, if you were to insert sphinx into the other species, they should be less gay. Unfortunately, Dai et al. don’t do that experiment, so we’re left to wonder with gayness can be cured by transgenics.


Dai et al. 2008. The evolution of courtship behaviors through the origination of a new gene in Drosophila. PNAS 105: 7478-7483 doi:10.1073/pnas.0800693105

Gailey et al. 2006. Functional Conservation of the fruitless Male Sex-Determination Gene Across 250 Myr of Insect Evolution. MBE 23: 633-643 doi:10.1093/molbev/msj070

Ryner et al. 1996. Control of Male Sexual Behavior and Sexual Orientation in Drosophila by the fruitless Gene. Cell 87: 1079-1089 doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81802-4

Wang et al. 2002. Origin of sphinx, a young chimeric RNA gene in Drosophila melanogaster. PNAS 99: 4448-4453 doi:10.1073/pnas.072066399

Comments

  1. #1 kevin z
    July 21, 2008

    Dude, you are so gay for posting this. How did the authors control for the possibility that these flies just didn’t happen to choose being gay?

  2. #2 PhysioProf
    July 21, 2008

    Calling these behaviors “homosexuality” is scientifically suspect, and is done only to create a feeding frenzy in the popular press. The authors who pull this shit should be ashamed of themselves.

  3. #3 dreikin
    July 21, 2008

    In a more questioning manner than PhysioProf, I’d like to know (seriously, I’m curious) how they can tell whether the greater time spent courting other males is because of confusion (they don’t know it’s male too) or ‘attraction’ (it knows the other one is also male, but it still wants to procreate with it).

  4. #4 p-ter
    July 21, 2008

    Calling these behaviors “homosexuality” is scientifically suspect, and is done only to create a feeding frenzy in the popular press. The authors who pull this shit should be ashamed of themselves

    oh, come on. the authors don’t call it homosexuality anywhere. but males flies copulating with each other certainly has some analogy to homosexuality. or at least enough of an analogy to homosexuality that it’s going to be called that in the popular press (and also by me if I ever describe this research to a non-scientist–i mean, seriously, those flies are clearly into dudes) no matter how you present it.

  5. #5 Kele Cable
    September 11, 2008

    Do the male-courting flies also court females and what is the ratio of that?

The site is undergoing maintenance presently. Commenting has been disabled. Please check back later!