Now on ScienceBlogs: Where the IPCC went wrong with its climate predictions

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

EvolutionBlog

Commentary on the Endless Dispute Between Evolution and Creationism

Profile

Jason Rosenhouse received his PhD in mathematics from Dartmouth College in 2000. He subsequently spent three years as a post-doc at Kansas State University. Observing the machinations of the Kansas Board of Education led to his unhealthy obsession with issues related to evolution and creationism. Currently he is an Associate Professor of Mathematics at James Madison University, in Harrisonburg, VA.


Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Sites I Like

Science Periodicals

Other Links




Log In

« The New York Times on the Big Creation Museum Trip | Main | Why It's Good to Know the Subject of a Conference Before Agreeing to Speak »

Book Fight, Round Two

Category: Evolution
Posted on: June 30, 2009 2:24 AM, by Jason Rosenhouse

A few weeks ago I took notice of a looming book fight between Richard Dawkins' forthcoming The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution and Jerry Coyne's book Why Evolution is True.

I gave Round One to Dawkins on the grounds of having a better title. Now Round Two goes to ... Coyne!

His book has shown up on Newsweek's list of fifty books to read now. Quite an honor!

What's that you say? Not really a fair fight since Dawkins' book hasn't been published yet? Cry me a river. Timing is everything.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

Comments

1

WEIT is a wonderful book: the evidence for evolution layed out in one concise, easy-to-read book. My two complaints are the frequent (and unnecessary) snide anti-creationist/IDist comments and zero emphasis placed on the generational holocaust required to make evolution work.

I feel that Dawkin's prose style is a long way in front of Coyne's (cf. "Ancestor's Tale", "Blind Watchmaker" &c.) and so I'm looking forward to September 22nd!

--
Martin

Posted by: MartinDH | June 30, 2009 8:43 AM

2

Jason,

Not a fight! Our books are very different, as one might expect. And we've been mutually supportive: Richard gave me a cover blurb, and I'm doing the same for him. We're all in the pro-evolution battle together.

Jerry

Posted by: Jerry Coyne | June 30, 2009 9:16 AM

3

IMHO Jerry Coyne's "Why Evolution is True" ranks alongside similar books written by his Harvard University mentor Ernst Mayr. It is the best little book I know of that mentions virtually every important bit of evidence in support of evolution (For me the only glaring admission is Coyne's omission of the importance of mass extinctions in reshaping the Earth's biosphere at least five, more likely, as many as eight, times in the past 550-odd million years (The time interval known as the Phanerozoic Eon.).

However, if Dawkins's new book is as extensive as his superb "The Ancestor's Tale", then I think Coyne has some serious competition!

Posted by: John Kwok | June 30, 2009 12:45 PM

4

Jerry -

Well you're no fun at all! You'll have a fight if I say you'll have a fight... :)

And I'm very jealous that you've gotten to see Dawkins' book.

Posted by: Jason Rosenhouse | June 30, 2009 12:57 PM

5

Jason -

So has Genie Scott. She was asked by Dawkins's American publisher to contribute a blurb.

Posted by: John Kwok | June 30, 2009 1:01 PM

6
We're all in the pro-evolution battle together.
How touching. Let's all join hands and sing Kumbaya.

Posted by: Bayesian Bouffant, FCD | June 30, 2009 3:07 PM

7

Jerry Coyne | June 30, 2009 9:16 AM:


Not a fight!

I hope this doesn't mean the Dawkins vs Coyne jello wrestling has been canceled?

Posted by: llewelly | July 2, 2009 12:42 AM

8

My gawd, it is 2009!! Why do we even need books explaining the validity of evolution???

Yes, I know I'm being silly and unrealistic about the current collapse of basic science education in the United States. But still...

The value in books like GSE or WEIT is whether the message of scientific and evolutionary reality can be made palatable and sensible to the fence-sitters, the gullible, or the uniformed. Perhaps THAT is the metric on which we should measure the value of such books?

The rest of us hardly need books to convince ourselves of what we already know.

Posted by: Greg Saville | July 9, 2009 1:34 PM

9

My gawd, it is 2009!! Why do we even need books explaining the validity of evolution???

Posted by: Siverek, Siverek Haber | July 19, 2009 5:01 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM