Seed Media Group

Evolving Thoughts

One man's struggle against impermanence

Search this blog

Profile

Grumpy John Wilkins is an aged, eternal student, who thinks philosophy of biology is at least as interesting as politics or sport and twice as important. He has a PhD from the University of Melbourne and a position as a Postdoctoral Fellow Sessional Lecturer at the University of Queensland, in Australia. After a varied career, involving factories, gardening, civil service, publishing, graphics, public relations but not, unfortunately for the CV, driving a truck, John finally completed his thesis on species concepts in 2004, which he has worked into two books. Species Definitions: A Sourcebook (Peter Lang) will come out in 2008; Species: A History of an Idea (University of California Press) will appear, it is hoped, in early 2009. He is also interested in cultural evolution, philosophy of religion, Macintosh computers and his kids.

If anyone knows of a tenurable, or even medium term, job in philosophy of biology, let me know. Have library, will travel. The contract ran out ...

This blog is designed to host any random thoughts that happen to be passing through my forebrain at a given moment. So there will be errors...

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Books I'm reading


Search old and new blogs



Other Information

My personal page is here:

John Wilkins' personal page

The previous instantiation of this blog is accessible here.

Add to Technorati Favorites Wikio - Top of the Blogs - Sciences Blog Directory - Blogged

« When a major network attacks | Main | Which came first? The spigot or the spinnaret? »

Scientists bite back

Category: Philosophy of SciencePolitics
Posted on: September 27, 2006 10:13 PM, by John S. Wilkins

A new organisation, SEFORA (Scientists and Engineers for America), has been formed to counter the abuse and supression of science currently popular in American media and politics. They have drafted a "Bill of Rights" for scientists and engineers which includes:

Federal policy shall be made using the best available science and analysis both from within the government and from the rest of society.

and

The federal government shall not support any science education program that includes instruction in concepts that are derived from ideology and not science.

The second one is worth playing up - intelligent design, anti-vaccination, Catholic objections to contraception and stem cell research, corporate attempts to play down the effects of pollution, global warming, bad nutrition and the like - all these are slowly finding their way into publicly funded education. The end result can only be a confused and therefore compliant populace, just what every demagogue wants.

A couple of things - one is that this needs to be an international group - "Scientists and Engineers for the World". Science is an international enterprise that spans across not only political, but ideological and economic boundaries, and if science is to be respected and properly used by politicians, then it needs to fight the forces of ignorance and spin everywhere.

Another thing is that they restrict their aim to the federal government, but as much or more harm comes from state governments, not only in the US but in, say, Brazil, where ecological concerns and laws are ignored by provincial governors who hand out logging permits.

In other words, it's a good start, but they are thinking too narrowly. When the Bush2 cabal is gone, there will be other cabals in state and federal governments that need to be brought to the heel of facts and knowledge.

Hat tip to Pharyngula by the guy with the incomprehensible name.

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Most German

Search All Blogs

Top Science Stories

powered by SEED - seedmagazine.com