Now on ScienceBlogs: Some reflections on my fifth blogiversary.

Enter to Win

Evolving Thoughts

One man's struggle against impermanence

Search

Profile

John Wilkins is an eternal student, who thinks philosophy of biology is at least as interesting as politics or sport and twice as important. He has a PhD from the University of Melbourne and worked at the University of Queensland, in Australia, before taking up a research fellowship at the University of Sydney. After a varied career, involving factories, gardening, civil service, publishing, graphics, public relations but not, unfortunately for the CV, driving a truck, John finally completed his thesis on species concepts in 2004, which he has worked into two books.

This blog is designed evolved to host any random thoughts that happen to be passing through my forebrain at a given moment. So there will be errors...

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Search old and new blogs



Other Information

The previous instantiation of this blog is accessible here.




Add to Technorati Favorites: Technorati Profile
Wikio - Top of the Blogs - Sciences
Blog Directory - Blogged
John Wilkins's Profile
John Wilkins's Facebook Profile

« We are SCARY here in Aus! | Main | Another meaningless online test »

Snakes and legs

Category: EvolutionSpecies and systematics
Posted on: September 21, 2006 8:52 PM, by John S. Wilkins

Snake feetThe Epoch Times is reporting the appearance of a snake with hindlegs in Shandong, China. Such reappearances of long-lost traits are called "atavisms", and in this case it appears this specimen has silenced genes that cause limb buds to stop growing and be resorbed. Quite a number of snakes form hind limb buds but lose them as they develop, while pythons retain spurs into adulthood and use them for mating.

What's interesting about this is not that atavisms exist from time to time, because we know now a lot more about the developmental triggering on genes and the conservation of genes across long distances of evolutionary time. What is interesting is that it means that the classification of snakes as Tetrapods is not silly.

A joke among taxonomists, or some taxonomists at any rate, is that snakes have four limbs in an unusual way (by not having them). Philosophically this might seem a dumb thing to say, but snakes are, in fact, derived tetrapods, and it's not that their limbs are present by not existing, but that the genes and developmental processes that generate limbs exist in snakes but are highly derived from their legged ancestor.

Many snakes have a pelvic girdle, and Cretaceous snakes have been found with hind limbs. It is thought that snakes separated from other reptiles in the Cretaceous, and they differentiated into the diversity we see today after the extinction of dinosaurs in the Paleocene.

Classification in modern biology relies on historical groups. A "clade" is a single species and all of its descendents. Since snakes arose within the clade of four legged organisms, they are tetrapods whether they have four limbs or none, since to remove them from that clade would make it an arbitrary group. Likewises, whales and dolphins are mammals despite not having hair or hind limbs (although whales also often have vestigial or atavistic hind limbs). Atavisms are an indication of the ancestry of a species or group, and show us that the only natural way to classify is to base our classes on evolutionary history.

Hat tip: John Latter.

Did you like this post? If so, please click on the "Share this" link above and add it to your favourite social bookmarking service, or submit it to the Open Laboratory 2009 via the link on the left bottom of the page. Many thanks. John.

Comments

1

What's also cool is that they never have atavistic front legs, because they don't have the right vertebrae so the front legs have no place to form. Legs don't grow just anywhere ...

Posted by: The Ridger | September 21, 2006 9:45 PM

2

Do all modern snakes descend from a single Cretaceous ancestor?

Posted by: lockean | September 21, 2006 10:49 PM

3
Do all modern snakes descend from a single Cretaceous ancestor?

Yes, and the Cretaceous ended about 4000BC.

Bob Ussher

Posted by: Bob O'H | September 22, 2006 1:03 AM

4

Naughty Bob. I think that the python split precedes the K-T barrier, but I'm not sure.

Posted by: John Wilkins | September 22, 2006 2:25 AM

5

Try http://www.venomdoc.com for lots of snakey goodness.

Posted by: Zarquon | September 23, 2006 4:16 AM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Collective Imagination
Enter to win the daily giveaway
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.