Now on ScienceBlogs: The Galaxy's Biggest Valentine

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Evolving Thoughts

One man's struggle against impermanence

Search

Profile

John Wilkins is an eternal student, who thinks philosophy of biology is at least as interesting as politics or sport and twice as important. He has a PhD from the University of Melbourne and worked at the University of Queensland, in Australia, before taking up a research fellowship at the University of Sydney. After a varied career, involving factories, gardening, civil service, publishing, graphics, public relations but not, unfortunately for the CV, driving a truck, John finally completed his thesis on species concepts in 2004, which he has worked into two books.

This blog is designed evolved to host any random thoughts that happen to be passing through my forebrain at a given moment. So there will be errors...

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Search old and new blogs



Other Information

The previous instantiation of this blog is accessible here.




Add to Technorati Favorites: Technorati Profile
Wikio - Top of the Blogs - Sciences
Blog Directory - Blogged
John Wilkins's Profile
John Wilkins's Facebook Profile

« A nice Victorian blog | Main | Bacterial research and evolution »

Medicine and logic

Category: General ScienceLogic and philosophyPhilosophy of Science
Posted on: March 19, 2007 10:24 PM, by John S. Wilkins

I have an ambivalent relationship with the medical profession. On the one hand - my left - I lost a finger because a general practitioner refused to investigate a wart, that turn cancerous. On the other, I think medicine is one of this civilisation's greatest achievements, at least when it is made available to people.

But I don't think highly of medical practice. So it comes as a great pleasure to read a medical practitioner saying:

So I was very happy to read an article in The Boston Globe today entitled, The mistakes doctors make by Dr. Jerome Groopman. Unfortunately, the online version of the article doesn’t have the informative graphic that accompanies the paper version. Dr. Groopman nicely illustrated a single case where fallacies in doctors’ reasoning led to a woman being misdiagnosed over and over again.

Why and how could this occur? Aren’t doctors taught to think logically and critically?

Well, it occurs for numerous reasons, but Dr. Groopman noted,
Physicians are rarely taught about pitfalls in cognition. During their training, they work as apprentices to senior doctors. They learn largely by doing. In today’s medical system, where there is intense pressure to see as many patients as possible, the quick judgment is often rewarded. Unfortunately, working in haste is a setup for errors in thinking.
Doctors (and therapists) don’t receive any formal education in logical fallacies. And call it laziness or human nature, but once a person has a diagnosis given by another professional (especially one given by a professional in the same specialty or degree as oneself), that tends to be the starting point for the next professional, not a blank slate.

It is for this reason that many people have diagnoses added to their record, but few removed. New professionals don’t rule out the possibility of the old diagnosis, they just add another one to capture what they believe is going on with the individual.

I would be more than happy to run a critical thinking course for medicos. Just say the word.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

Comments

1

SUNY Stony Brook should have an opening.

Posted by: PZ Myers | March 20, 2007 10:37 AM

2

Not in brain surgery, I hope. I'm not a brain surgeon.

Posted by: John Wilkins | March 20, 2007 10:41 AM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.