Seed Media Group

Evolving Thoughts

One man's struggle against impermanence

Search this blog

Profile

Grumpy John Wilkins is an aged, eternal student, who thinks philosophy of biology is at least as interesting as politics or sport and twice as important. He has a PhD from the University of Melbourne and a position as a Postdoctoral Fellow Sessional Lecturer at the University of Queensland, in Australia. After a varied career, involving factories, gardening, civil service, publishing, graphics, public relations but not, unfortunately for the CV, driving a truck, John finally completed his thesis on species concepts in 2004, which he has worked into two books. Species Definitions: A Sourcebook (Peter Lang) will come out in 2008; Species: A History of an Idea (University of California Press) will appear, it is hoped, in early 2009. He is also interested in cultural evolution, philosophy of religion, Macintosh computers and his kids.

If anyone knows of a tenurable, or even medium term, job in philosophy of biology, let me know. Have library, will travel. The contract ran out ...

This blog is designed to host any random thoughts that happen to be passing through my forebrain at a given moment. So there will be errors...

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Books I'm reading


Search old and new blogs



Other Information

My personal page is here:

John Wilkins' personal page

The previous instantiation of this blog is accessible here.

Add to Technorati Favorites Wikio - Top of the Blogs - Sciences Blog Directory - Blogged

« Is postmodernism retreating? | Main | Is there a physicist in the house? »

Stuff, not nonsense

Category: EvolutionHistoryLogic and philosophyPhilosophy of SciencePolitics
Posted on: January 8, 2008 6:50 PM, by John S. Wilkins

Some things I spotted today..

It's Alfred Russel Wallace's birthday. Mike Dunford has a post card. I always think that if Wallace had recognised that selection is not all about survival, he could have come up with an account of social selection causing big brains (the so-called Machiavelli hypothesis) instead of Spirit.

The Environmental Action blog is calling for the resignation of the head of the EPA for refusing to allow California to regulate emissions. See also Effect Measure.

Two really good Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy articles have been just published:

Animal Cognition by Kristin Andrews. Having just taught this stuff, I can say this is an excellent roundup.

Axiom of Choice by John L. Bell. One of those basic concepts in set theory I never quite understood.

The Open Paleontologist is a new blog on open source and open publications in that field.

Savage Minds points out that Obama's mum was a field anthropologist who graduated from the University of Hawai'i.

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

Comments

#1

About animal cognition: I just want to let everyone know, that one of my three dogs, female, 16 years old, has been trying to speak most of her life. She has problems articulating, but she looks at one with intent and tries to form "words" or "meaningful sounds". The most distinct "meaningful sounds" come when she wants to complain about something. At least towards me she manages to transmit plenty of information. She is not a "trained dog" in the systematic sense, by the way. Just for the record. I am not sure how good science looks into this. Anthropomorphism on my part? Should I take it as "signalling" and not as "communication"?

Posted by: stelios | January 9, 2008 3:50 AM

#2

Part of the problem is that dogs have been selected for compatibility with human social structures, so it's unclear if they are symbolically thinking. However, I think it likely that most complex social animals have some degree of symbolic thinking. At the very least they can associate words with behaviours, which is a form of symbolic expression. They use signals to represent states of affairs that way. I have a very old cat who, before she went deaf, could recognise words in ordinary spoken conversation and react accordingly. I reckon she got to 15 or 20 words in her vocabulary.

Posted by: John S. Wilkins | January 9, 2008 4:10 AM

#3

I have a cat that thinks I'm an idiot. You can tell from the disdain it shows me and how it lavishes attention on other humans. Many humans have thought the same thing (that I'm an idiot). Thus the cat must be as intelligent as some humans or I'm an idiot I guess.

Posted by: Brian English | January 9, 2008 2:28 PM

#4

Wallace broke with Darwin on natural selection in humans because he thought it could not explain the size and function of the human brain. Wallace thought, contrary to the general opinion, that tribal folks were just as smart as upper crust Brits. He thought, however, that tribal people lived simple lives which would not select for them being all that smart. However, a quote from a cultural antrophology class back in the 50's. "A tribal witchdoctor has as much knowledge as a modern MD." A little shift in cultural perspective between the 1850's and 1950's.

Posted by: Jim Thomerson | January 9, 2008 3:13 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Most Active

  1. Protecting the Right of Conscience? 08.20.2008 · PZMinion
  2. Compare and Contrast 08.21.2008 · PZ Myers
  3. Fisk It Yourself 08.21.2008 · Ed Brayton
  4. Open Thread 12 08.19.2008 · Tim Lambert
  5. More Orson Scott Card Nuttiness 08.21.2008 · Ed Brayton

Search All Blogs

Top Science Stories

powered by SEED - seedmagazine.com