Good to see that Olivia Judson has finally caught up with me...
Evolving Thoughts
One man's struggle against impermanence
Search this blog
Profile
John Wilkins is an eternal student, who thinks philosophy of biology is at least as interesting as politics or sport and twice as important. He has a PhD from the University of Melbourne and a position as a Sessional Lecturer at the University of Queensland, in Australia. After a varied career, involving factories, gardening, civil service, publishing, graphics, public relations but not, unfortunately for the CV, driving a truck, John finally completed his thesis on species concepts in 2004, which he has worked into two books.
This blog is designed evolved to host any random thoughts that happen to be passing through my forebrain at a given moment. So there will be errors...
Recent Posts
- Not the end of evolution again!
- A quote from Hume
- Thoughts on the "Shuttle gap"
- God tells the creationists off
- The Darwinian Gardener again
- An open letter to creationists
- My book is out the door
- Journals object to index metrics
- Why bonobos will never get their own prime time TV show
- The origins of agriculture now extended
Recent Comments
- Thony C. on Not the end of evolution again!
- Elliott Grasett on A quote from Hume
- Renee on Not the end of evolution again!
- John S. Wilkins on Not the end of evolution again!
- Martin on Not the end of evolution again!
- Ian on Not the end of evolution again!
- Josh Hayes on Which Discworld character are you?
- MPL on Not the end of evolution again!
- Jason Grossman on Not the end of evolution again!
- Bob O'H on Not the end of evolution again!
Archives
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
Blogroll
- Aetiology
- Afarensis
- Brooke McEldowney's blog
- Darwin Central
- De Rerum Natura
- Deanne Taylor's Blog at Nature
- Dienekes' Anthropology Blog
- Dispatches from the Culture Wars
- Galactic Interactions
- Genomicron
- John Hawks Anthropology Weblog
- Laelaps
- Malfunction Junction
- Musgrave's Astroblogger
- National Center for Science Education
- Pharyngula
- Rationally Speaking
- Sandwalk
- Scott Page's All-too-common dissent
- Sirus
- Small Things Considered
- Sunbeams from Cucumbers
- The Lippard Blog
- The Loom
- The Panda's Thumb
- The Questionable Authority
- The Thinking Meat Project
- Thoughts in a Haystack
- Unruled Notebook
- Unscrewing The Inscrutable
![]()
Search old and new blogs
Other Information
My personal page is here:
The previous instantiation of this blog is accessible here.
« History of evolution | Main | I've been LOL'd!!1 »
Getting rid of "Darwinism"
Category: Evolution • History • Philosophy of Science
Posted on: July 16, 2008 8:54 AM, by John S. Wilkins
Find more posts in:
Life Science
Humanities & Social Science



Comments
Can we also dump Copernicanism while we're about it?
Posted by: Thony C. | July 16, 2008 10:09 AM
I disagree that the problem with the "-ism" is that it suggests a finality to Darwins arguments,that he was the "beginning and end of evolutionary biology".
The term is not one usually used by scientists,its being propagated by Creationists,the DI and their ilk,and just represents their particular Goebbels-esque tendency to create "isms" to devalue certain theories by turning them into an -ism,Darwinist,Evulutionist etc.....
Posted by: clinteas | July 16, 2008 10:31 AM
I'm relatively sure that Einsteinism needs to go, too, as well as ismism.
Posted by: Ian | July 16, 2008 11:59 AM
Ulrich Kutschera of the University of Kassel has suggested introducing the term "Darwin-Wallace principle of natural selection" (Nature 453:27, 2008).
Posted by: James F | July 16, 2008 2:02 PM
I'm sure in German that's one word, too.
Posted by: AntiquatedTory | July 16, 2008 8:07 PM
Let's see: Der Darwinische-WallaceischeSatzdernatürlicheAuslese...
How do Germans breathe, anyway?
Posted by: John S. Wilkins | July 16, 2008 8:17 PM
What's that line from E. B. White? Something like "She dove into the sea of her sentence, and finally emerged, panting, on the other side, with her verb in her teeth."
(He probably used fewer commas. :))
Posted by: RBH | July 17, 2008 2:56 AM
Durch ihren Arschloch natuerlich!
Posted by: Thony C. | July 17, 2008 3:14 AM
*sigh*
Everyone's a comedian!
Posted by: James F | July 17, 2008 2:20 PM
For values of E. B. White that equal S. L. Clemens, anyway.
"Whenever the literary German dives into a sentence, that is the last you are going to see of him till he emerges on the other side of his Atlantic with his verb in his mouth."
Posted by: Owlmirror | July 17, 2008 2:24 PM
Units are often called for names of discoverers: Ohms, Volts, Newtons, Einsteins, etc. Does anyone use the evolutionary unit, the Darwin? A Darwin is a 1% change in the gene pool of a population over one generation.
Posted by: Jim Thomerson | July 17, 2008 4:19 PM
"Does anyone use the evolutionary unit, the Darwin? A Darwin is a 1% change in the gene pool of a population over one generation.
I think they should refer to a kilodarwin as a "gould".
(Incidentally, there seem to be different definitions of what a darwin is floating around, or are they equivalent and I just not understanding? (very, very possible).
Posted by: Dan S. | July 19, 2008 10:18 PM
According to Wikipedia a darwin is an e-fold amount of change over one million years, and was devised by J. B. S. Haldane. I think it is flawed because it assumes that rates of change are commensurable across the evolutionary tree in absolute terms, and this is a mistake.
Posted by: John S. Wilkins | July 19, 2008 10:29 PM