Now on ScienceBlogs: Charles Darwin February 12, 1809 - April 19, 1882

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Evolving Thoughts

One man's struggle against impermanence

Search

Profile

John Wilkins is an eternal student, who thinks philosophy of biology is at least as interesting as politics or sport and twice as important. He has a PhD from the University of Melbourne and worked at the University of Queensland, in Australia, before taking up a research fellowship at the University of Sydney. After a varied career, involving factories, gardening, civil service, publishing, graphics, public relations but not, unfortunately for the CV, driving a truck, John finally completed his thesis on species concepts in 2004, which he has worked into two books.

This blog is designed evolved to host any random thoughts that happen to be passing through my forebrain at a given moment. So there will be errors...

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Search old and new blogs



Other Information

The previous instantiation of this blog is accessible here.




Add to Technorati Favorites: Technorati Profile
Wikio - Top of the Blogs - Sciences
Blog Directory - Blogged
John Wilkins's Profile
John Wilkins's Facebook Profile

« Fallacies on fallacies | Main | Ants! »

New paper on science blogging

Category: General SciencePhilosophy of ScienceSocial evolution
Posted on: September 22, 2008 8:55 PM, by John S. Wilkins

Science blogging is a relatively new phenomenon, the impact of which is slowly becoming clear. Gone are the days when an albino silverback philosopher was a top ranking science blogger (I am quite happy to be a philosophy of science blogger, and not take credit for anything I didn't earn). I recently had a paper in Trends in Ecology and Evolution on the topic, which was more an analysis of how they functions for those used to the older publishing trajectories. Now Sciblings Shelley Batts, Nick Anthis, and Tara Smith have an advocacy paper in PLoS Biology, in which they seek to legitimate science blogs as professional activities of science, particularly of outreach. Drug Monkey has a good overview and discussion.

As a parenthetical note, the term "outreach" always triggers up images of earnest young folk playing guitars and singing "Kumbaya". There has to be something more appropriate for science and academe in general. How about "communication"?

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Education & CareersPolitics

Comments

1

Along those lines Scientific American has an article on Web Science. Thought you'd be interested.

Posted by: Alan Kellogg | September 22, 2008 9:44 PM

2

In my former field (entomology), "outreach" is called "extension". Just a suggestion.

p.s. if you're albino, how can we be sure you're a silverback?

Posted by: djlactin | September 23, 2008 2:29 AM

3

I am a paradox. An enigma wrapped up in a riddle, inside a conundrum. I am all possible bald men. I contain multitudes. Man, I gotta get more of this weed...

Posted by: John S. Wilkins | September 23, 2008 2:34 AM

4
the term "outreach" always triggers up images of earnest young folk playing guitars and singing "Kumbaya".

That's "religious outreach" John. "Scientific outreach" is when they sing the Elements song from Tom Lehrer accompanying themselves on a concertina as invented by Wheatstone, he of the Bridge.

Posted by: Thony C. | September 23, 2008 6:18 AM

5

There has to be something more appropriate ... How about "communication"?

Or how about "Framing"?

Posted by: divalent | September 23, 2008 9:49 AM

6

I didn't make up the term, but the reason the act of scientists contributing to science education is called "outreach" is that it describes Universities and other institutions reaching out to the outside world.

"Communication" is not an appropriate term because outreach encompasses far more than communication. Science outreach groups often have a mission to serve the broader community through classes, developing and sharing curriculum, and many other kinds of hands-on activities.

Posted by: Sandra Porter | September 23, 2008 10:35 AM

7

Sweet, thanks John.
As a result of, like, the end of the first paragraph of that paper of yours, I am writing a paper with Joan on scientsts attitudes to scientific blogging (with UQ Guinea pigs if my ethics approval ever comes through).
Yay more articles and a tonne of blogroll links...

On outreach? I know why they do use it, Sandra, but seriously, what it evokes is something else. It reinforces Snow's two worlds thingy.

Posted by: pubcat | September 23, 2008 3:05 PM

8

Pubcat: I know several people who work in science outreach programs. Seriously, the word "outreach" evokes the proper picture. Almost all of the educators I know were probably camp counselors in a former life.

Posted by: Sandra Porter | September 23, 2008 3:23 PM

9

the term "outreach" always triggers up images of earnest young folk playing guitars and singing "Kumbaya"

Really? Must be an Australianianism. In the USA, we call that "fellowship."

"Outreach" is when a major corporation donates $50K worth of lab equipment to public schools, and then spends $3M publicizing the fact.

Posted by: HP | September 23, 2008 4:55 PM

10

(Second Try)

Scientific American has an article up on Web Science. I thought you'd be interested.

Posted by: Alan Kellogg | September 23, 2008 10:27 PM

11

Unlike some of you [holds fingers up in annoying quotes gesture] I am not a Registered Scientitian or a college student and get my education fix wherever I can. I love science blogs. On occasion, reading them even leads to reading actual books. Certainly, reading Talk.origins leads to reading books (yes, I know, not a blog). Eventually, I may learn something.

Posted by: Susan Silberstein | September 24, 2008 2:52 AM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.