Now on ScienceBlogs: Another contender for the worst reporting ever: "Coma man"

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Evolving Thoughts

One man's struggle against impermanence

Search

Profile

John Wilkins is an eternal student, who thinks philosophy of biology is at least as interesting as politics or sport and twice as important. He has a PhD from the University of Melbourne and worked at the University of Queensland, in Australia, before taking up a research fellowship at the University of Sydney. After a varied career, involving factories, gardening, civil service, publishing, graphics, public relations but not, unfortunately for the CV, driving a truck, John finally completed his thesis on species concepts in 2004, which he has worked into two books.

This blog is designed evolved to host any random thoughts that happen to be passing through my forebrain at a given moment. So there will be errors...

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Search old and new blogs



Other Information

The previous instantiation of this blog is accessible here.




Add to Technorati Favorites: Technorati Profile
Wikio - Top of the Blogs - Sciences
Blog Directory - Blogged
John Wilkins's Profile
John Wilkins's Facebook Profile

« Body of Copernicus found | Main | The trashcan categorial »

If the UN calls a world philosophy day and doesn't tell anyone...

Category: HumorLogic and philosophy
Posted on: November 20, 2008 8:45 PM, by John S. Wilkins

... has it still happened? Anyway, the BBC, bless 'em, has had philosopher David Bain pose four philosophical questions to mark the epistemologically problematic day:

1. Should we kill healthy people for their organs?
2. Are you the same person who started reading this article?
3. Is that really a computer screen in front of you?
4. Did you really choose to read this article?

Or in more traditional terms: Utilitarian ethics, personal identity, perception and illusion, and free will and determinism. Sneaky. Get 'em in with a condundrum and then pervert the minds of those who stay to consider. Classic Socratic corruption of the youth. Well played, that man.

Did you like this post? If so, please click on the "Share this" link above and add it to your favourite social bookmarking service, or submit it to the Open Laboratory 2009 via the link on the left bottom of the page. Many thanks. John.

Comments

1

Did a little round-up of a news article and some links - but then, Queenslanders are usually on the ball regarding Philosophy in Schools. :)
http://podblack.com/?p=1062

Posted by: Podblack | November 20, 2008 9:15 PM

2

Hmm...

1. No
2. Yes
3. Yes
4. Yes

And BTW, the number of angels that can dance on the head of a pin is 28. I counted.

Posted by: Romeo Vitelli | November 20, 2008 9:59 PM

3

Did you count the real angels, or just the integers? I make it 33.673991 angels.

Posted by: John S. Wilkins | November 20, 2008 10:12 PM

4

No
Yes and No
Who cares?
No.

Feel free to use these as your answer key.

Posted by: Anon | November 20, 2008 10:51 PM

5

1. It is an illusion to think that one can kill anybody
2. Do people really exist?
3. What's real?
4. See 3!

It is an illusion to believe that pins have heads!

Posted by: Thony C. | November 21, 2008 3:37 AM

6

Come,come, John! you make it approximately 33.673991 angels.

Posted by: Elliott Grasett | November 21, 2008 10:51 AM

7

What most people don't realize is that the number of angels that can dance on the head of a pin depends not on the angels but the style of dance the are doing. If they are doing dances that allow a large number to crowd into a small space like ballroom or line-dancing then you can get upwards of 40 on the head of a pin. On the other hand, there are dances that need a lot more space so you might only get 10 jitterbugging or breakdancing angels on the same pinhead.

The wings get in the way, too.

Posted by: Ian H Spedding FCD | November 21, 2008 10:54 PM

8

1. No, not for organs but yes for a Fender Stratocaster.

2. Define person

3. Is this a monitor which I see before me,
The mouse toward my hand? Come, let me click thee.
I link thee not, and yet I see thee still.
Art thou not, fatal Vista, sensible
To keyboard as to mouse? or art thou but
A Window of the mind, a false creation,
Proceeding from the pride-oppressed Gates?
I see thee yet, in form as palpable
As this which now I Corel draw.

4. No, I just pretended.

Posted by: Ian H Spedding FCD | November 21, 2008 11:13 PM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM