Now on ScienceBlogs: The Galaxy's Biggest Valentine

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Evolving Thoughts

One man's struggle against impermanence

Search

Profile

John Wilkins is an eternal student, who thinks philosophy of biology is at least as interesting as politics or sport and twice as important. He has a PhD from the University of Melbourne and worked at the University of Queensland, in Australia, before taking up a research fellowship at the University of Sydney. After a varied career, involving factories, gardening, civil service, publishing, graphics, public relations but not, unfortunately for the CV, driving a truck, John finally completed his thesis on species concepts in 2004, which he has worked into two books.

This blog is designed evolved to host any random thoughts that happen to be passing through my forebrain at a given moment. So there will be errors...

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Search old and new blogs



Other Information

The previous instantiation of this blog is accessible here.




Add to Technorati Favorites: Technorati Profile
Wikio - Top of the Blogs - Sciences
Blog Directory - Blogged
John Wilkins's Profile
John Wilkins's Facebook Profile

« Antivaxer story on the way | Main | When even the NYT notices, it's obvious »

An ancient cladogram

Category: EvolutionHistoryPhilosophy of ScienceSpecies and systematics
Posted on: April 29, 2009 10:48 PM, by John S. Wilkins

As I investigate the use of tree diagrams in the nineteenth century, I keep running across things that shouldn't be there. One of them was this book:

Herdman, William Abbott. 1885. A Phylogenetic Classification of Animals (For the Use of Students). London; Liverpool: Macmillan & Co.; Adam Holden.

It's on Archive.org, but they didn't properly scan the figure on the foldout (a real problem of the electronic versions of old books is that they don't scan the foldout figures. Imagine the Origin without the one figure). So I bought a copy. It's a real revelation - he correctly uses "polyphyletic" in its modern sense on page 2. So below the fold is the figure and the caption, with a link to a larger version to download.

Of interest is that Herdman is mixing phylogeny with grades - the vertical axis represents "advance in structure", whatever that might mean. It's not cladism yet...

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

Comments

1

wow.
It's engrossing, like an old map.

Posted by: Sven DiMilo | April 30, 2009 3:02 PM

2

Wow! 1885!

Posted by: Coturnix | April 30, 2009 3:07 PM

3

It is truly an incredible find. If you had just posted the reference, I would have thought the 1885 date was mistyped from 1985. The downward slope to indicate degeneration is a nice touch.

You bought yourself a copy? A facsimile?

Posted by: Roberto Keller | April 30, 2009 9:13 PM

4

An echt copy. Lacking only the back cover and spine...

Posted by: John S. Wilkins | April 30, 2009 10:01 PM

5

What a wonderful find, John!

Posted by: Laelaps | April 30, 2009 11:09 PM

6

Actually, the quality of the foldout in the scan is almost as good as that of your scan. In general, I'm amazed at how they managed to get that file down to 5.2 MB. I suppose all sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic…

Posted by: David Marjanović | May 1, 2009 1:32 AM

7

Actually, the quality of the foldout in the scan is almost as good as that of your scan.

DUH!!?

Have you looked at the large version of John's scan, David?

Posted by: Thony C. | May 1, 2009 2:34 AM

8

John,

You just go out and buy 1885 texts? If you have a long-term habit of doing this, I really want to see what's on the rest of your bookshelves!

Posted by: fvngvs | May 1, 2009 5:43 PM

9

I used to tell my then wife: "It's cheaper than fishing". I have a 19thC book habit.

Posted by: John S. Wilkins | May 1, 2009 5:54 PM

10

David is right - if you download the PDF the image is high quality. I saw only another version without the good foldout.

Posted by: John S. Wilkins | May 1, 2009 6:02 PM

11

Fantastic find John, its interesting how we can find things in history that are almost modern, and then there are these other touches. Ever read Kepler's Correspondence with Galileo? Kepler sounds like a lunatic in some sections.

Posted by: Ian Musgrave | May 1, 2009 9:52 PM

12

David is right - if you download the PDF the image is high quality. I saw only another version without the good foldout.

I apologise unreservedly to David; I didn’t even realise that the text is downloadable and in the version posted on the website the diagram at the back of the book is unreadable.

Posted by: Thony C. | May 2, 2009 12:49 AM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.