The political debate over stem cell research in Australia is following a pattern similar to the controversy in the U.S. This week, after Australian PM John Howard announced that he would support a continued Federal ban on medical cloning, a decision at odds with the recommendations of a recent independent commission, several Australian states are considering passing legislation that would bypass Federal rules. Meanwhile, scientists in the country are using the ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS frame to argue in favor of research, warning that a Federal ban could lead to a "brain drain" of top scientific talent. And politicians are arguing that the ban denies the hope for promising cures and treatments. The Australian Broadcasting Corporation has this archived Web and radio report.
Framing Science
What's Next in Public Engagement?
Search
Profile
Matthew C. Nisbet, Ph.D, is a professor in the School of Communication at American University where his research focuses on the intersections between science, media, and politics. E-MAIL: nisbetmc@gmail.com
Comment Policy
-
Keep it substantive, serious minded, on topic, and respectful.
Upcoming Talks
- 11.02.09 Canadian Stem Cell Network, Montreal, CA
- 10.08.09 Robert Wood Johnson Fellows, San Diego, CA
- 09.17.09 Age of Personalized Genetics, Banff, CA
- 09.14.09 Aldo Leopold Fellows, DC
Sci-Comm Journals
Media Agenda-Setters
- Andrew Revkin
- John Broder
- Juliet Eilperin
- Curtis Brainard
- Felicity Barringer
- Charlie Petit
- Kenneth Chang
- Shankar Vedantam
- Nicholas Wade
- Richard Harris
- Jonathan Moreno
- Julie Rovner
- Gina Kolata
- Joe Palca
- Cornelia Dean
- David Goldston
- Nature's Science & Politics
- Andrew Pollack
- Allison Aubrey
- William J. Broad
- John Tierney
UK, Canada, & Australia
- BBC Science
- Guardian Science
- Guardian Environ
- FTimes: Sci & Technology
- CP: Science
- Globe & Mail: Science
- Toronto Star: Science
- CBC: How to think about Science
- TheAustralian: Sci & Nature
- Australian Broadcasting Corporation: Science
News Wires
Social Media to Watch
- Revkin's Dot Earth
- NYTimes Green Inc.
- WSJ's Enviro Capital
- Science Insider
- Scheufele's NanoPublic
- John Fleck's InkStain
- Andrew Maynard's 2020 Science
- Roger Pielke Jr.'s Blog
- Breakthrough Institute
- Real Climate
- AJOB's Bioethics.net
- KQED's Quest
Science Podcasts
Research Centers
- SoC @ American U.
- Center for Social Media
- Center for Climate Change Communication
- Yale's Climate Media Forum
- Climate Central
- Pew Excellence in Journalism
- Pew People & Press
- Pew Internet & Public Life
- Pew Religion & Public Life
Media & Culture
- PBS' Current Mag
- Howard Kurtz's Media Notes
- NPR's On the Media Podcast
- NY Times' The Lede: Notes on News
- NY Times Public Editor
- CJR Daily
- Jay Rosen's Press Think
- Romenesko's Daily Fix
- Jarvis' Buzz Machine
- Media Matters for America
- Editor&Publisher: News
« TEN YEARS AFTER DOLLY: A Look Back at Framing at Scientific American and Der Spiegel; Understanding the Science Versus Cloning Hitler | Main | DOES SIZZLING SUMMER HEAT GENERATE NEWS ATTENTION TO GW? Some Evidence Says Yes; Hot Weather Provides Another Narrative Opportunity to Tell the Story of Climate Change »
AS THE US GOES, SO DOES AUSTRALIA: States Look to Bypass Australia's Federal Ban on Embyronic Stem Cell Research; Research Advocates Warn of "Brain Drain"
Category: FRAME: Economic Competitiveness • FRAME: Ethics/Morality • Stem Cell / Cloning Research
Posted on: July 15, 2006 12:06 PM, by Matthew C. Nisbet
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/16180
