Seed Media Group

Framing Science

STRATEGISTS <----> JOURNALISTS <----> PUBLICS

Search this blog

Profile

Matthew C. Nisbet, Ph.D, is a professor in the School of Communication at American University where his research focuses on the intersections between science, media, and politics. E-MAIL: nisbetmc@gmail.com

Wikio - Top Blogs - Sciences

Framing Science Articles

Upcoming Talks

Comment Policy

U.S. Frame-Setters

UK, Canada, & Australia

News Wires

Editorial Pages

Blogs & Podcasts

« CROWDING OUT SCIENCE: "Perfect Storm" of Foreign Policy Crises Likely to Push Climate Change, Stem Cell Research, and Other Science/Enviro Topics Down Media-Policy-Public Agenda | Main | AS THE US GOES, SO DOES AUSTRALIA: States Look to Bypass Australia's Federal Ban on Embyronic Stem Cell Research; Research Advocates Warn of "Brain Drain" »

TEN YEARS AFTER DOLLY: A Look Back at Framing at Scientific American and Der Spiegel; Understanding the Science Versus Cloning Hitler

Category: FRAME: Ethics/MoralityPlant/Animal BiotechnologyStem Cell / Cloning Research
Posted on: July 13, 2006 11:35 AM, by Matthew C. Nisbet

DerSpiegelHITLER.jpg
SciAmDolly.gif
Last week was the ten year anniversary of the birth of the cloned sheep Dolly. Looking around for good examples of visual framing for a course I teach in Political Communication, I came across this classic comparison between the cover stories that ran at Scientific American and the German weekly Der Spiegel. Playing to audiences with a different set of interests, and to political cultures with very different histories when it comes to genetic engineering, the magazines take the same event, and visually accent dimensions that lead to competing interpretations of the announcement.

Scientific American interprets the event in classic science journalism terms, focusing on the technical side, backgrounding and contextualizing the research involved. Der Spiegel, as a political weekly in a particular cultural milieu with an incentive to maximize newstand sales, emphasizes instead the dramatic ethical and moral implications, relating the event to the possibility of cloning Hitler.

Comments

Die Frauen sind seit 1000 Jahre durch die christliche Erziehung geklonte Menschen, die Christinnen. Alle den-
ken gleich, alle glauben an Jesus. Alle sind geistig
geklont. Stoert das jemanden heute? Nur Bischof Mixa
aus Augsburg, der Schnautze voll hat von die Feminis
tinnen, die Toechter Alice Schwarzer.
Wir Alle sind christlich geklont, nur das ist so normal,
dass es niemand merkt, wie Brecht sagte!

Posted by: mark | December 2, 2007 1:47 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Most Active

  1. Imagine 130,000 breasts bobbing in the sea 12.04.2008 · PZ Myers
  2. Give Bill O'Reilly apoplexy 12.04.2008 · PZ Myers
  3. Wind-Powered Perpetual Motion 12.03.2008 · Mark C. Chu-Carroll
  4. Praying for Economic Recovery 12.04.2008 · Ed Brayton
  5. Was Nazi science good science? 12.04.2008 · Orac

Search All Blogs