Now on ScienceBlogs: Another contender for the worst reporting ever: "Coma man"

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Search

Profile

Matthew C. Nisbet, Ph.D, is a professor in the School of Communication at American University where his research focuses on the intersections between science, media, and politics. E-MAIL: nisbetmc@gmail.com

Wikio - Top Blogs - Sciences

Comment Policy

Upcoming Talks

Sci-Comm Journals

Media Agenda-Setters

UK, Canada, & Australia

News Wires

Social Media to Watch

Science Podcasts

Research Centers

Media & Culture

« FRAMING SCIENCE GOES INTERACTIVE: Streaming Video of AIBS Lecture from May; Upcoming Oct. 11 Presentation at AAAS on the Communication Battles Over Science Policy | Main | CHRIS WALLACE RESPONDS: "I tried repeatedly to adhere to the ground rules...." »

WHEN NEGOTIATING THE NEWS BACKFIRES: Clinton Gets Angry When Fox News Sunday Violates the Agreed Upon Ground Rules; Gotcha Moment Disrupts Attempt to Engage Moderate GOP on Global Warming

Category: FRAME: Strategy/ConflictIssue Attention Cycles
Posted on: September 25, 2006 2:06 PM, by Matthew C. Nisbet

clinton.jpg

News outlets and the blogosphere are abuzz over Bill Clinton's appearance on Fox News Sunday. The whole episode is a classic example of how the negotiation of news between journalists and powerful sources can sometimes go wrong, especially when the two parties might ultimately have competing goals.

After hosting a week long summit on global warming that raised $7 billion, Clinton wanted to use Fox News to reach its GOP viewers on the issue. Clinton's effort was paired with agenda-building activities during the week that were designed to attract attention among GOP members of the public who would otherwise tune out the events, activities that included a keynote address by Laura Bush and an appearance by none other than Rupert Murdoch.

Fox News agreed to ground rules that global warming would be the dominant topic of the interview as a way to gain an exclusive with the former President. Things went awry, however, when Wallace asked Clinton about his record on Al Queda and his administration's failed attempts to capture Bin Laden. In response, Clinton did the only smart thing he could, he went on the offensive, not only defending his record, but also exposing the "backstage" agreement that journalists and powerful officials work out to stage media appearances. (Transcript here and full video here.)

CLINTON: Did you ever ask that? You set this meeting up because you were going to get a lot of criticism from your viewers because Rupert Murdoch is going to get a lot of criticism from your viewers for supporting my work on climate change. And you came here under false pretenses and said that you'd spend half the time talking about...

WALLACE: [laughs]

CLINTON: You said you'd spend half the time talking about what we did out there to raise $7 billion dollars plus over three days from 215 different commitments. And you don't care.

**********

When Fox News actually ran the taped interview, they introduced the segment with their side of the ground rules, claiming that they had agreed with Clinton to spend 15 minutes on global warming and 15 minutes on anything else.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/22051

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM