Now on ScienceBlogs: Pale Blue Dot

Seed Media Group

Search

Profile

Matthew C. Nisbet, Ph.D, is a professor in the School of Communication at American University where his research focuses on the intersections between science, media, and politics. E-MAIL: nisbetmc@gmail.com

Wikio - Top Blogs - Sciences

Comment Policy

Upcoming Talks

Sci-Comm Journals

Media Agenda-Setters

UK, Canada, & Australia

News Wires

Social Media to Watch

Science Podcasts

Research Centers

Media & Culture

« MORE CONTEXT ON THE INHOFE HYPE: CJR Daily References Framing Science as Source in Reaction to Senator's Attack on the Messenger | Main | CAN INTELLIGENT DESIGN GO GLOBAL? Pope's Continued Mixed Messages Allow Conservatives to Frame Appeals that Resonate with Catholic Audiences Internationally »

STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION IN THE FOLEY CASE: If You Were a Republican, and Wanted This Scandal Over, What Should You Do? Lanny Davis On Framing the Story Before Your Opponents Do

Category: FRAME: Strategy/Conflict
Posted on: October 5, 2006 9:13 AM, by Matthew C. Nisbet

Foley.jpg

Lanny Davis, former White House counsel under Clinton, veteran of the Monica Lewinsky wars, and a recognized expert on crisis communication was on NPR this morning, offering some very valuable insight on message strategy in the Mark Foley page scandal.

Davis recommends that iin any scandal, you want to get out in front of the story early in order to frame responsibility before either the media or your opponents do it for you. He argues that the GOP leadership, knowing about the emails last May, should have immediately confronted Foley, alerted the House Ethics Committee, told the Democratic and Republican members in charge of the Page program, and then gone public via the media.

With this strategy, Hastert & Co. would have been in front of the story while giving an impression of bi-partisanship, and the potential for a political feeding frenzy would have evaporated

But now, after the fact, Hastert continues to make all the typical mistakes that have propelled scandals in the media from Nixon forward. He first denied the story, then tried to evade the subject in media appearances, and then attacked Democrats. All of this, according to Davis, has only served to give the story more legs and to amplify attention.

When the revelations broke last week, Hastert instead should have admitted that he made a "misjudgment," something that happens in every workplace. He should have admitted that he could have handled the matter differently, apologized, and then promised that Foley would be thoroughly investigated.

But now, the dominant and powerful interpretations emanating from the Foley scandal are those of incompetency (GOP in a Bubble), and hypocrisy. And these are powerful negative interpretations for voters as they get ready to go to the polls.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/22795

Comments

1

Or how about... they should have been honest and come forward early because it is the RIGHT THING TO DO!

Posted by: E. Powers | October 5, 2006 10:14 AM

2

In the immortal word[s] of Frederick of York... naaaah.

Posted by: Steve Bloom | October 5, 2006 2:42 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM