To be honest, I hadn't seen the online program Bloggingheads.tv before. But today they offer a pretty substantive discussion of our Framing Science thesis. Apparently the host agrees with us. His co-host misunderstands our goals for communication and the research on framing and media influence. But that's okay. It's clearly meant to be a point/counter-point. Kind of a Siskel and Ebert of blog commentary. Pretty cool.
Framing Science
What's Next in Public Engagement?
Search
Profile
Matthew C. Nisbet, Ph.D, is a professor in the School of Communication at American University where his research focuses on the intersections between science, media, and politics. E-MAIL: nisbetmc@gmail.com
Comment Policy
-
Keep it substantive, serious minded, on topic, and respectful.
Upcoming Talks
- 11.02.09 Canadian Stem Cell Network, Montreal, CA
- 10.08.09 Robert Wood Johnson Fellows, San Diego, CA
- 09.17.09 Age of Personalized Genetics, Banff, CA
- 09.14.09 Aldo Leopold Fellows, DC
Sci-Comm Journals
Media Agenda-Setters
- Andrew Revkin
- John Broder
- Juliet Eilperin
- Curtis Brainard
- Felicity Barringer
- Charlie Petit
- Kenneth Chang
- Shankar Vedantam
- Nicholas Wade
- Richard Harris
- Jonathan Moreno
- Julie Rovner
- Gina Kolata
- Joe Palca
- Cornelia Dean
- David Goldston
- Nature's Science & Politics
- Andrew Pollack
- Allison Aubrey
- William J. Broad
- John Tierney
UK, Canada, & Australia
- BBC Science
- Guardian Science
- Guardian Environ
- FTimes: Sci & Technology
- CP: Science
- Globe & Mail: Science
- Toronto Star: Science
- CBC: How to think about Science
- TheAustralian: Sci & Nature
- Australian Broadcasting Corporation: Science
News Wires
Social Media to Watch
- Revkin's Dot Earth
- NYTimes Green Inc.
- WSJ's Enviro Capital
- Science Insider
- Scheufele's NanoPublic
- John Fleck's InkStain
- Andrew Maynard's 2020 Science
- Roger Pielke Jr.'s Blog
- Breakthrough Institute
- Real Climate
- AJOB's Bioethics.net
- KQED's Quest
Science Podcasts
Research Centers
- SoC @ American U.
- Center for Social Media
- Center for Climate Change Communication
- Yale's Climate Media Forum
- Climate Central
- Pew Excellence in Journalism
- Pew People & Press
- Pew Internet & Public Life
- Pew Religion & Public Life
Media & Culture
- PBS' Current Mag
- Howard Kurtz's Media Notes
- NPR's On the Media Podcast
- NY Times' The Lede: Notes on News
- NY Times Public Editor
- CJR Daily
- Jay Rosen's Press Think
- Romenesko's Daily Fix
- Jarvis' Buzz Machine
- Media Matters for America
- Editor&Publisher: News
« The UN Frames Global Warming as Really about Security | Main | NPR: Are we asking scientists to be advocates? To spin false information? Read the transcript. »
BloggingHeadTV on Framing Science
Category: Enviro/Science Reporting
Posted on: April 17, 2007 5:42 PM, by Matthew C. Nisbet
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/38398
Comments
Well, Henry is a smart guy from one of the top academic blogs in the world. The other guy speaks for Cato Institute so he has an agenda to push.
Posted by: coturnix | April 17, 2007 8:00 PM
if you mean that henry farrell is the 'host,' no, it is a diavlog. the real host is robert wright, but you don't see him. henry & will are equals.
Posted by: razib | April 17, 2007 8:54 PM
Sudden specific thought on the Framing article.
"Messages must be positive and respect diversity."
This is not always true.
This type of message seems fairly worthless for deprogramming the brainwashed. Specifically, respecting diversity is simply used as an excuse to retain the brainwashing. Being "positive" is important but difficult to do, since it's essential to discredit the brainwashers.
Of course, I doubt that any mass media message is useful for deprogramming the brainwashed.
But have no doubt: we are dealing with a lot of genuinely brainwashed people. The brainwashing techniques used by right-wing churches are pretty well documented. Therefore I think that while your arguments are good for reaching the *non-brainwashed* masses, the *brainwashed* require a different approach. What approach, I wonder?
Posted by: Nathanael Nerode | April 18, 2007 1:36 AM