Now on ScienceBlogs: Dr. Rolando Arafiles: Antivaccine rhetoric, colloidal silver for the flu, and Morgellons disease

Enter to Win

Search

Profile

Matthew C. Nisbet, Ph.D, is a professor in the School of Communication at American University where his research focuses on the intersections between science, media, and politics. E-MAIL: nisbetmc@gmail.com

Wikio - Top Blogs - Sciences

Comment Policy

Upcoming Talks

Sci-Comm Journals

Media Agenda-Setters

UK, Canada, & Australia

News Wires

Social Media to Watch

Science Podcasts

Research Centers

Media & Culture

« Breaking the Tyranny of the News Peg in Hurricane Coverage | Main | Speaking Science 2.0 Available on YouTube »

At Science, a Focus on Media Training for Scientists

Category: Enviro/Science Reporting
Posted on: May 29, 2007 9:00 AM, by Matthew C. Nisbet

In a letter published at Science, Cornell University professors and media relations staff offer their recommendations on media training training for scientists.

The recommendations are based on a media relations course for graduate students taught as part of the Biogeochemistry and Environmental Biocomplexity program.


Below are some specifics:

Currently, most communication training for scientists begins after a prominent scientific discovery, and the training often occurs in a trial-by-fire style. However, a cultural shift is under way, reflecting the higher stakes of research, and an increased recognition by scientists, stakeholders, and policymakers that (i) scientists need to get their message out, (ii) scientists need training to learn how to do so, and (iii) training should begin at the graduate level.

Over the past year, we developed and recently completed a science communication course for graduate students in the Biogeochemistry and Environmental Biocomplexity program at Cornell University (funded by a NSF Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship grant). The goal of this course was to improve our ability to discuss our research with both the general public and the professionals writing and reporting on science in the media. This was achieved through a combination of guest lectures, field trips, and development of individual projects.

From this experience, we strongly encourage other graduate programs to implement science communication training. We have three key pieces of advice based on our effort that we hope will help others in their course development:

First, involve people from multiple fields across your college or university. In particular, we highly recommend involving staff from the press relations office. These specialists have a unique perspective on what topics are newsworthy and on the challenges scientists face in communicating effectively. Include scientists who have personal experience communicating their research to the public and journalists from your campus or local newspaper.

Second, visit a news room (radio, print, or television) and talk to reporters--not just science reporters, but reporters in all fields. Ask to sit in on a meeting where reporters and editors pitch stories to each other. This process reveals what stories interest reporters and how those stories are developed. Understanding this process will help scientists identify and explain the newsworthy attributes of their own research.

Third, get hands-on experience communicating science as part of the class. Do not just set up a series of lectures and field trips: write press releases, write articles, conduct interviews, get interviewed, create a Web page, and set up a science blog. Ask your collaborating journalists and PR specialists to facilitate and critique student projects. Hands-on experience with feedback from media professionals and other students provided some of the most useful learning experiences in our course.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/41478

Comments

1

Many of the bits of advice they offer are a part of the Media Fellowship Scheme that has been running in the UK for 20 years or so. Check out the BA Media Fellowships

It was an idea that I lifted from the AAAS and that the British Association adapted to meet the needs of working scientists rather than would-be science writers.

The problem is that this scheme can handle only a handful of scientists every year. With researchers far outnumbering writers, it is hard to see how everyone can get real hands on experience.

I have participated in workshops. Some seem to do a reasonable job in communicating the issues facing science writers.

First, though, scientists have to respect the role of the science writer. I recently encountered one eminent researcher who seems to have the opinion that science writers are failed researchers. This it not my experience. Many science writers I know are, unlike me, brighter than a lot of the researchers I have encountered. They just have different interests.

Posted by: Michael Kenward | June 12, 2007 6:03 AM

2

communicating knowledge is what i perceive a natural gift.NOT many scientists could be coerced to adopt the role of a sci communicator and only those who have the flair and predisposition can only do the job better.
Dr.Arvind Mishra

Varanasi
India

Posted by: arvind | June 14, 2007 5:32 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Collective Imagination
Enter to win the daily giveaway
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.