Now on ScienceBlogs: Live Organ Transplants
What's Next in Public Engagement?
Matthew C. Nisbet, Ph.D, is a professor in the School of Communication at American University where his research focuses on the intersections between science, media, and politics. E-MAIL: nisbetmc@gmail.com
« Center for Inquiry Author Attacked in India | Main | How Extreme Weather Inspired Frankenstein »
Category: Framing Science
Posted on: August 14, 2007 8:16 AM, by Matthew C. Nisbet
The Scientist is currently sponsoring an online discussion about framing and new directions in science communication. The web feature is in advance of an article I am contributing to the magazine, co-authored with Dietram Scheufele, a colleague at the University of Wisconsin. So far, more than 40 comments have been posted. There is also a reader survey at the site.
Regarding The Scientist discussion, Mary Miller has more to add in a post at her blog The Accidental Scientist.
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/47546
PZ Myers 11.09.2009
Ed Brayton 11.09.2009
PZ Myers 11.09.2009
Orac 11.08.2009
Ed Brayton 11.09.2009
Comments
Why graduate students? Why not a broader group as part of the educational discipline? Is it because graduate students are defined acolytes chosen for the priesthood?
Smacks of Luntz. The target is intentionally treated as an object to be manipulated for public policy by an overclass. Yes, please conduct research to determine which psychological and physiological triggers would make me more pliant to your view, so that it can be activated at will. Cause THAT'S not liable to be abused.
Posted by: Ted | August 14, 2007 8:44 AM