Now on ScienceBlogs: Surgical masks versus respirators for flu protection

Seed Media Group

Search

Profile

Matthew C. Nisbet, Ph.D, is a professor in the School of Communication at American University where his research focuses on the intersections between science, media, and politics. E-MAIL: nisbetmc@gmail.com

Wikio - Top Blogs - Sciences

Comment Policy

Upcoming Talks

Sci-Comm Journals

Media Agenda-Setters

UK, Canada, & Australia

News Wires

Social Media to Watch

Science Podcasts

Research Centers

Media & Culture

« Experts More Worried about Nanotech than Public | Main | AU Students Debate the Internet's Impact on Society, Part A »

Americans Rate the Country's Top Football Conference

Category: Public Opinion
Posted on: November 26, 2007 7:16 AM, by Matthew C. Nisbet

Tressel.jpg

Cfootball.gif

You can debate the wisdom of spending more than $100 million a year on your athletics program or whether you want someone like Jim Tressel to be the national face of your university. Yet this time of year, love it or hate it, college football reigns supreme in the minds of most students and faculty.

Gallup has even released a nationally representative telephone survey evaluating which conference Americans rate the toughest. Across the sample, the SEC rates tops with 30% of all respondents saying that the SEC has been the strongest over the last 10 years. But this total aggregate number is a bit deceiving and in fact as shown in the table above reflects the single minded brand preference of Americans living in the South. On the other hand the Big 10 rates tops in the East and the Midwest and not surprisingly the Pac 10 rates tops for those living on the left coast.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/56565

Comments

1

Someone should get ahold of the demographics of the sports writers and coaches who vote in the various polls that rank football (and basketball) teams (AP, USA Today, Harris). I strongly suspect there are some regional biases built into some of those polls, largely leaning toward teams from the south.

Posted by: chezjake | November 26, 2007 4:32 PM

2

As a Northern transplant to the South, I have to say that the SEC is incredibly deep, and if the very best teams in the SEC aren't as good year in and year out as those that have an easy ride to the top of the Big 10 and Pac 10 every year, it's probably because they get beat up in a conference that is top to bottom as good or better than any other. Having said that, there's an easy way to settle this question: bowl outcomes. Does anyone know where there is an analysis of the last decade of bowl victories?

Posted by: Leukocyte | November 26, 2007 9:19 PM

3

As a fan of Wisconsin I see the bias regularly. The last three years UW played three southern teams, in all three games they were underdogs, one year being 14 point underdogs (in a bowl game??) They went 2-1, losing the one by a field goal. All three of those games came against SEC opponents.

Posted by: dogmeatib | December 20, 2007 7:46 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Enter to win

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM