What Causes People to Vote for a Radical-Right Party? : Framing Science

Search

Profile

Matthew C. Nisbet, Ph.D, is a professor in the School of Communication at American University where his research focuses on the intersections between science, media, and politics. E-MAIL: nisbetmc@gmail.com

Comment Policy

Keep it substantive, serious minded, on topic, and respectful.

Upcoming Talks

Sci-Comm Journals

Media Agenda-Setters

UK, Canada, & Australia

News Wires

Social Media to Watch

Science Podcasts

Research Centers

Media & Culture

« Even the Pope Needs an Image Consultant | Main | Huckabee: The Greatest Communicator Since Reagan »

What Causes People to Vote for a Radical-Right Party?

Category: Journal/Book Watch
Posted on: January 2, 2008 5:28 PM, by Matthew C. Nisbet

Back in 2005 when I spent a month as a visiting scholar at Dresden Technical University in Germany, I was stunned to be told by several graduate students that in the rural areas of Saxony a quarter of voters supported so-called neo-nazi political parties and organizations. Now one of my favorite academic outlets, the International Journal of Public Opinion Research, features in its latest issue two essays debating the roots of public support for radical right parties in Europe. For those logging on from an academic or institutional gateway with a subscription, the two essays are well worth checking out.

Find more posts in: Humanities & Social Science Politics

Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/60154

Comments

Following a chain of related articles led to this:

http://apps.isiknowledge.com/CEL/CIW.cgi?SID=4DdoIAopJeN3KeHjHEN&Func=Abstract&doc=2/20

Abstract: This paper examines Ireland's 2004 Constitutional Amendment which removes birthright citizenship from any future Irish-born children of immigrant parents. I argue that for particular historical reasons, the ability of the state to convince its citizens of the necessity for this Amendment was remarkable and I suggest that it was able to do so by constructing citizenship as a moral regime and foreign-nationals and their foetuses as 'suspect patriots.'....

Posted by: Hank Roberts | January 2, 2008 6:55 PM

How perfectly apropos that this question should follow a post about Benedictus, the Hitlerjugende Panzerpapst...

Posted by: Pierce R. Butler | January 2, 2008 7:06 PM

Hank Roberts,

Unfortunately, I could not access the article, but from the portion of the abstract I can appreciate its logic.

The referendum was accompanied by a wave of falsities circulated by press and politicians. The major story was that pregnant non-nationals were arriving just before term of their pregnancy, going straight from Dublin Airport to a maternity ward to have their babies, then leaving a week later confident thier children were now Irish (and EU) citizens.

The maternity wards were supposedly "swamped" by non-nationals making it difficult to cope with Irish women.

Even after these lies were denied by the masters of each maternity hospital (in a joint statement), somehow whenever the pro-side were at a loss for arguments, "maternity services" always crept back into the debate.

In the end the referendum was passed. Bad day for Ireland.

Posted by: toby | January 3, 2008 5:12 AM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

The Latest Readers' Picks

Framing Science