Now on ScienceBlogs: Let the War on Christmas Begin. Atheist style.

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Search

Profile

Matthew C. Nisbet, Ph.D, is a professor in the School of Communication at American University where his research focuses on the intersections between science, media, and politics. E-MAIL: nisbetmc@gmail.com

Wikio - Top Blogs - Sciences

Comment Policy

Upcoming Talks

Sci-Comm Journals

Media Agenda-Setters

UK, Canada, & Australia

News Wires

Social Media to Watch

Science Podcasts

Research Centers

Media & Culture

« Bobby Jindal On Why He Supports Creationism | Main | Texas GOP Leader on Why She Supports Creationism »

Gov. Tim Pawlenty on Why He Supports Creationism

Category: 2008 ElectionEvolution/Intelligent Design
Posted on: September 2, 2008 11:39 AM, by Matthew C. Nisbet

The McCain choice of Sarah Palin has made creationism a topic that various GOP spokespeople are now being asked by the press to weigh in on. From the interviews, an emerging talking point appears to be that "it's a local decision." On Sunday, Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty was asked by Tom Brokaw about Palin's position and his personal views on the issue. Video above and transcript below.

MR. BROKAW: Okay. In the governor's race, she refused to be specific about her views on Creationism versus evolution. But, as I understand it, she did say that she thought that the two subjects should be taught side-by-side in public schools. Do you think that's a good idea?

GOV. PAWLENTY: I saw her comments on it yesterday, and I thought they were appropriate, which is, you know, let's -- if there are competing theories, and they are credible, her view of it was, according to the comments in the newspaper, allow them all to be presented or allow them both to be presented so students could be exposed to both or more and have a chance to be exposed to the various theories and make up their own minds.

MR. BROKAW: In the vast scientific community, do you think that Creationism has the same weight as evolution, and at a time in American education when we are in a crisis when it comes to science, that there ought to be parallel tracks for Creationism versus evolution in the teaching?

GOV. PAWLENTY: In the scientific community, it seems like intelligent design is dismissed -- not entirely, there are a lot of scientists who would make the case that it is appropriate to be taught and appropriate to be demonstrated, but in terms of the curriculum in the schools in Minnesota, we've taken the approach that that's a local decision. I know Senator Palin -- or Governor Palin -- has said intelligent design is something that she thinks should be taught along with evolution in the schools, and I think that's appropriate. My personal view is that's a local decision --

MR. BROKAW: Given equal weight.

GOV. PAWLENTY: -- of the local school board.

MR. BROKAW: And you would recommend it be given equal weight?

GOV. PAWLENTY: We've said in Minnesota, in my view, this is a local decision. Intelligent design is something that, in my view, is plausible and credible and something that I personally believe in but, more importantly, from an educational and scientific standpoint, it should be decided by local school boards at the local school district level.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/80188

Comments

1

NO! NO! NO! NOoooooooooo!!!!!

Science should NEVER be edited by LOCAL elected officials! ***Bangs Head Against Wall***

Stupid people make me SMASH!!!!

Posted by: Chris | September 2, 2008 1:35 PM

2

Honestly I'm waiting for any journalist interviewing someone like this to reply "No, that's simply not true. There is no evidence whatsoever supporting the ID/creationist's hypothesis and no credible scientist has backed such an idea." and then shut up and let the person talk around the steaming pile that is their creationist propaganda. When will anyone from the media grow a pair and quit allowing such bullshit to pass as "just another viewpoint".

Posted by: Super Jesus | September 2, 2008 3:44 PM

3

"Super Jesus" - I'd like any interviewer who has some politician making a comment like that to actually respond by asking another question: "You said that you think local school boards should control what is taught in science classes, so if a local school board decides to teach kids that the sun orbits the earth you think that would be okay? Right?"

In other words, smash the nonsense with a rhetorical question based on his answer.

Posted by: SteveG | September 2, 2008 6:16 PM

4
But, as I understand it, she did say that she thought that the two subjects should be taught side-by-side in public schools.
Brokaw doesn't understand much then. Palin:
"I don't think there should be a prohibition against debate if it comes up in class. It doesn't have to be part of the curriculum."

She added that, if elected, she would not push the state Board of Education to add such creation-based alternatives to the state's required curriculum.

Posted by: Craig Mc | February 23, 2009 3:18 AM

5

Will someone please teach these people that "theory" has a specific definition in the context of scientific methodology, that it doesn't equal "wild-ass guess" the way pro-creationist politicians seem to believe?

The idea of "local" science is ludicrous.

Posted by: Bill | July 30, 2009 4:09 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM