Genetic Future
Commentary on human genetics and evolution, direct-to-consumer genetic testing, and the personal genomics industry.
Search
Profile
Daniel MacArthur
I write about the genetic and evolutionary basis of human variation, and the companies trying to sell you information about your genome.
Daniel also blogs about personal genomics at Genomes Unzipped.
Subscribe via RSS.
Follow me on Twitter.
Recent Posts
- Genetic Future is moving
- One more step towards the end of recessive diseases
- New FireFox plugin for 23andMe customers
- Why you CAN have your $1000 genome - so long as you learn what to do with it
- Bioscience Resource Project critique of modern genomics: a missed opportunity
- Genomes Unzipped reader survey
- News from 23andMe: a bigger chip, a new subscription model and another discount drive
- Why I'm releasing my genetic data online
- Oddities of the odds ratio
- Genetic Future is moving to Wired
Recent Comments
- Dan Frost on Genetic Future is moving
- Neil on One more step towards the end of recessive diseases
- Daniel MacArthur on One more step towards the end of recessive diseases
- Neil on One more step towards the end of recessive diseases
- Daniel MacArthur on One more step towards the end of recessive diseases
- Moreno on One more step towards the end of recessive diseases
- Bob on One more step towards the end of recessive diseases
- Neil on One more step towards the end of recessive diseases
- Jonathan on One more step towards the end of recessive diseases
- Daniel MacArthur on One more step towards the end of recessive diseases
Archives
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
Blogs I read:
Consumer Genomics:
Genomic Science:
- Anthony Fejes
- David Dooling
- Dan Koboldt
- Luke Jostins
- Pathogenomics
- Jan Aerts
- Popgen Ramblings
- Adaptive Complexity
- Genomicron
Genetics/Evolution Blogs:
- Razib Khan
- John Hawks
- Gene Expression
- Eye on DNA
- Dienekes
- Yann Klimentidis
- European Genetics
- Discovering Biology in a Digital World
- The Genetic Genealogist
- business|bytes|genes|molecules
- Thomas Mailund
- John Halamka
General Science:
Corporate Blogs:
Skeptics:
« Knome's whole genome sequencing auction goes live on eBay | Main | Photo Synthesis »
Personal Genome Project looking for next wave of volunteers
Category: personal genome project • whole-genome sequencing
Posted on: April 26, 2009 4:50 PM, by Daniel MacArthur
The benefits to volunteers are straightforward: you get access to your own genome sequence before most human beings on the planet, and you get the warm fuzzy glow that comes with benefiting humanity. I'm not being at all sarcastic about the latter benefit. The PGP is an audacious experiment in overcoming both the technological and social challenges of providing access to large-scale genetic information, and whatever progress it makes will have a very real impact on the future of human genomics.
Thus far 10 brave volunteers (the PGP-10) have agreed to have their genetic and health data splashed onto the web; two of these intrepid souls, Misha Angrist and John Halamka, have blogs that you can follow. The PGP aims to recruit a further 100 volunteers in the next wave, followed by a further 1,000, and so on until the 100,000-recruit target is reached.
Volunteering to participate is not simply a matter of filling in a few forms: the PGP takes the notion of "informed consent" to a new level, requiring that you prove just how informed you are by taking an entrance test that assesses your "comprehension of concepts relevant to providing informed consent to participate in the PGP" including "concepts such as potential risks of participating, project protocols, and basic genetics".
The PGP has also adopted a bold and unusual approach to data privacy that some may be uncomfortable with - so make sure you know what you're signing up for.
To register for updates on how you can participate in the PGP fill in this form.


Comments
And don't forget Jason Bobe's blog (http://thepersonalgenome.com/). Not updated as frequently as Misha or John's but that's probably because Jason, as Director of Community for the PGP, has just one or two other things on his plate at the moment!
Posted by: Dan Vorhaus | April 26, 2009 11:10 PM
Hi Dan,
Good point - anyone interested in the PGP should definitely subscribe to Jason's RSS feed for (very occasional but useful) updates.
Posted by: Daniel MacArthur | April 27, 2009 4:32 AM
Thanks for this post. I've always been interested in learning all about this kind of thing. I've been reading books on genetics, ERVs, genetic markers, and all that other good stuff that's used to trace heritage back. Now I just gotta hope I get chosen. :-)
Posted by: KemaTheAtheist | April 27, 2009 10:38 PM
I'm curious... why are older people with grown children a desired group?
Posted by: Donna B. | April 27, 2009 11:50 PM
"I'm curious... why are older people with grown children a desired group?"
If I were to take a guess (and this is only a guess), it would be because it may show a trend where they would be more likely to have a larger family tree. If the family tree is bigger, it would probably also be more likely to have the kinds of genetic markers they're looking for to trace back lineages and such.
Posted by: KemaTheAtheist | April 28, 2009 1:46 PM
Shucks, must be "Resident of the United States" >:P
Posted by: Paulino | April 29, 2009 11:34 AM
There are several reasons why this cohort is more desirable.
From an informed consent perspective, participants who are not planning to have additional children avoid potentially difficult decisions about whether to conceive in light of information that they may learn through participation (e.g., with respect to monogenic traits that they might pass on to children). With grown children that decision has already been made.
Similarly, the PGP encourages participants to consult with first-degree relatives about the risks of participation prior to enrollment. That process is obviously easier and more effective with grown children.
Also, from a study design perspective, participants with grown children are more likely to generate family trios for enrollment in the project.
Posted by: Dan Vorhaus | April 30, 2009 9:59 AM
Really hope they'll include non-US residents in the PGP-1000 or 10k.. it would be nice not to get stuck that early on in the selection process based purely on one's address.
Posted by: laura | April 30, 2009 10:16 PM