[Genetic Alliance Director of Genetics and Health Policy Kristi] Zonno said FDA should create a public registry for genetic tests to "enable transparency and promote informed decision making for consumers and providers." She said that registry "could and should include the myriad of genetic, genomic, and pharmacogenomic testing available to the US market."This move is long overdue - there have been discussions of the need for such a database in many circles for well over a year, but there has been no visible progress yet. This is an enormously complex industry, and consumers need guidance from independent bodies (certainly more than they need over-zealous regulation of the industry). If Genetic Alliance can convince FDA to make a real effort here that would be a major step in the right direction.
Open to the public, the registry should at the very least include the name of the lab performing a test, the name of the test developer, and information to support the test's usefulness in obtaining results and improving clinical care, Zonno added.
Genetic Future
Commentary on human genetics and evolution, direct-to-consumer genetic testing, and the personal genomics industry.
Search
Profile
Daniel MacArthur
I write about the genetic and evolutionary basis of human variation, and the companies trying to sell you information about your genome.
Subscribe via RSS.
Follow me on Twitter.
Recent Posts
- My Gene Profile: the lamest genetic testing scam on the internet?
- DIY ancestry inference from personal genomic data
- Details on the future of the deCODEme service
- deCODE Genetics declare bankruptcy, will sell core business to US investors
- 23andMe raises prices, splits its health and ancestry analyses
- 23andMe gets scooped on hair curl genes
- More on return of research data to participants from Genomics Law Report
- Research subjects should have access to their own data
- First ever association study using whole genome sequences
- What happens when a DTC genomics company goes bust? Follow up post on Genomics Law Report
Recent Comments
- detox on On the challenges of conference blogging
- Ashley on Allowing children to be born with severe disease is morally equivalent to child abuse, round 2
- Pet on My Gene Profile: the lamest genetic testing scam on the internet?
- Shawn on Chinese summer camp to offer genetic tests for IQ, athletic performance, emotional control
- Ronald Binder on My Gene Profile: the lamest genetic testing scam on the internet?
- Marc on My Gene Profile: the lamest genetic testing scam on the internet?
- K Risipin on My Gene Profile: the lamest genetic testing scam on the internet?
- Geneticist from the East on My Gene Profile: the lamest genetic testing scam on the internet?
- Steven Murphy MD on My Gene Profile: the lamest genetic testing scam on the internet?
- Dan Vorhaus on My Gene Profile: the lamest genetic testing scam on the internet?
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
Blogs I read:
Consumer Genomics:
Genomic Science:
- Anthony Fejes
- David Dooling
- Dan Koboldt
- Luke Jostins
- Pathogenomics
- Jan Aerts
- Popgen Ramblings
- Adaptive Complexity
- Genomicron
Genetics/Evolution Blogs:
- John Hawks
- Gene Expression
- Gene Expression SB
- Eye on DNA
- Dienekes
- Yann Klimentidis
- European Genetics
- Discovering Biology in a Digital World
- The Genetic Genealogist
- business|bytes|genes|molecules
- Thomas Mailund
- John Halamka
General Science:
Corporate Blogs:
Skeptics:
« Nature News article on conference blogging | Main | 23andMe leading push for regulatory changes for direct-to-consumer genetic testing »
Genetic Alliance calls for a genetic test registry
Category: direct-to-consumer genetic testing
Posted on: June 24, 2009 7:10 PM, by Daniel MacArthur
GenomeWeb reports that the advocacy group Genetic Alliance is lobbying the FDA for the construction of a public registry of genetic tests:
Find more posts in: 
Life Science
Medicine & Health
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
Comments
Daniel,
This is huge and should keep the marketing idiots from inferring that you can use a 23andMe test to rule out CF carrier state!
I am so sick of marketing and business people monkeying this whole field up!
Steve
Posted by: Steven Murphy MD | June 24, 2009 8:21 PM
what about genetests.org?
Posted by: Chaim | June 25, 2009 12:00 AM
Hi Chaim,
Off the top of my head: GeneTests has an almost entirely clinical focus, doesn't cover most recreational tests or genome scans, doesn't provide independent reviews of the validity of tests, and doesn't provide information in a format that's easy for a consumer to understand.
Posted by: Daniel MacArthur | June 25, 2009 11:15 AM
The venture caps would love state mandated barriers to entry on this is. Can't let those pesky garage entrepreneurs do it with credit cards and Ramen noodles.
The free market obviously does not work and it's clear that Nancy Pelosi, John McCain and Barney Frank need to protect us.
Just like they did with TARP.
Seriously, folks, who are the "genetic alliance" dudes? Sounds like some industry lobbying group; i.e. keep your hand on your wallet.
Posted by: anomalous | June 25, 2009 1:49 PM
anomalous,
Right - so having to add "the name of the lab performing a test, the name of the test developer, and information to support the test's usefulness in obtaining results and improving clinical care" to a database is an unfair barrier to market entry for a genetic test provider claiming to provide health benefits?
Come on. I agree that over-the-top regulations (e.g. barring a company from a offering a test unless it meets requirements for clinical validity) would be counter-productive, but providing accurate information to consumers to enable them to make a sound decision in a complex area is a Good Thing.
Posted by: Daniel MacArthur | June 26, 2009 11:07 AM
There is NO need for a government approved list at this time.
Unless "Genetic Alliance" discloses its sponsors, then I'm assuming it's another industry lobbying group doing what they do : spinning the public relations and buying protection.
Yes, they'd love to have government approval for their competitors. "Just fill out this 40 page questionnaire and we'll get back to you with a decision".
Where's the evidence that we NEED this at this time ?
Posted by: anomalous | June 26, 2009 4:56 PM
Hello 'anomalous',
Genetic Alliance is a 501 (c)(3) not-for-profit health advocacy organization. We were founded in 1986 as the Alliance for Genetic Support Groups, and are committed to transforming health through genetics. Our open network connects members of parent and family groups, community organizations, disease-specific advocacy organizations, professional societies, educational institutions, corporations, and government agencies to create novel partnerships. We actively engage in improving access to information for individuals, families and communities, while supporting the translation of research into services. We promote an environment of openness centered on the health of individuals, families, and communities. Openness forms both the process and product for Genetic Alliance.
Please visit our website at http://www.geneticalliance.org or email us at info@geneticalliance.org to find out more about our mission and goals.
Posted by: Genetic Alliance Staff | June 30, 2009 11:03 AM
GeneticAllianceStaff,
I'm glad your committed to open-ness. What percentage of you funding comes from corporations involved in biotech?
Posted by: anomalous | June 30, 2009 11:56 AM
Anomalous,
Less than 5% of Genetic Alliance's funding is from biotech/pharma. Please visit www.geneticalliance.org for more information.
Posted by: GeneticAllianceStaff | July 2, 2009 3:54 PM
GeneticAlliance Staff.
How about a specific URL? not the front page.
Posted by: anomalous | July 6, 2009 10:24 AM