[Genetic Alliance Director of Genetics and Health Policy Kristi] Zonno said FDA should create a public registry for genetic tests to "enable transparency and promote informed decision making for consumers and providers." She said that registry "could and should include the myriad of genetic, genomic, and pharmacogenomic testing available to the US market."This move is long overdue - there have been discussions of the need for such a database in many circles for well over a year, but there has been no visible progress yet. This is an enormously complex industry, and consumers need guidance from independent bodies (certainly more than they need over-zealous regulation of the industry). If Genetic Alliance can convince FDA to make a real effort here that would be a major step in the right direction.
Open to the public, the registry should at the very least include the name of the lab performing a test, the name of the test developer, and information to support the test's usefulness in obtaining results and improving clinical care, Zonno added.
Genetic Future
Commentary on human genetics and evolution, direct-to-consumer genetic testing, and the personal genomics industry.
Search
Profile
Daniel MacArthur
I write about the genetic and evolutionary basis of human variation, and the companies trying to sell you information about your genome.
Daniel also blogs about personal genomics at Genomes Unzipped.
Subscribe via RSS.
Follow me on Twitter.
Recent Posts
- Genetic Future is moving
- One more step towards the end of recessive diseases
- New FireFox plugin for 23andMe customers
- Why you CAN have your $1000 genome - so long as you learn what to do with it
- Bioscience Resource Project critique of modern genomics: a missed opportunity
- Genomes Unzipped reader survey
- News from 23andMe: a bigger chip, a new subscription model and another discount drive
- Why I'm releasing my genetic data online
- Oddities of the odds ratio
- Genetic Future is moving to Wired
Recent Comments
- Dan Frost on Genetic Future is moving
- Neil on One more step towards the end of recessive diseases
- Daniel MacArthur on One more step towards the end of recessive diseases
- Neil on One more step towards the end of recessive diseases
- Daniel MacArthur on One more step towards the end of recessive diseases
- Moreno on One more step towards the end of recessive diseases
- Bob on One more step towards the end of recessive diseases
- Neil on One more step towards the end of recessive diseases
- Jonathan on One more step towards the end of recessive diseases
- Daniel MacArthur on One more step towards the end of recessive diseases
Archives
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
Blogs I read:
Consumer Genomics:
Genomic Science:
- Anthony Fejes
- David Dooling
- Dan Koboldt
- Luke Jostins
- Pathogenomics
- Jan Aerts
- Popgen Ramblings
- Adaptive Complexity
- Genomicron
Genetics/Evolution Blogs:
- Razib Khan
- John Hawks
- Gene Expression
- Eye on DNA
- Dienekes
- Yann Klimentidis
- European Genetics
- Discovering Biology in a Digital World
- The Genetic Genealogist
- business|bytes|genes|molecules
- Thomas Mailund
- John Halamka
General Science:
Corporate Blogs:
Skeptics:
« Nature News article on conference blogging | Main | 23andMe leading push for regulatory changes for direct-to-consumer genetic testing »
Genetic Alliance calls for a genetic test registry
Category: direct-to-consumer genetic testing
Posted on: June 24, 2009 7:10 PM, by Daniel MacArthur
GenomeWeb reports that the advocacy group Genetic Alliance is lobbying the FDA for the construction of a public registry of genetic tests:
Find more posts in: 
Life Science
Medicine & Health
Life ScienceMedicine & Health
Comments
Daniel,
This is huge and should keep the marketing idiots from inferring that you can use a 23andMe test to rule out CF carrier state!
I am so sick of marketing and business people monkeying this whole field up!
Steve
Posted by: Steven Murphy MD | June 24, 2009 8:21 PM
what about genetests.org?
Posted by: Chaim | June 25, 2009 12:00 AM
Hi Chaim,
Off the top of my head: GeneTests has an almost entirely clinical focus, doesn't cover most recreational tests or genome scans, doesn't provide independent reviews of the validity of tests, and doesn't provide information in a format that's easy for a consumer to understand.
Posted by: Daniel MacArthur | June 25, 2009 11:15 AM
The venture caps would love state mandated barriers to entry on this is. Can't let those pesky garage entrepreneurs do it with credit cards and Ramen noodles.
The free market obviously does not work and it's clear that Nancy Pelosi, John McCain and Barney Frank need to protect us.
Just like they did with TARP.
Seriously, folks, who are the "genetic alliance" dudes? Sounds like some industry lobbying group; i.e. keep your hand on your wallet.
Posted by: anomalous | June 25, 2009 1:49 PM
anomalous,
Right - so having to add "the name of the lab performing a test, the name of the test developer, and information to support the test's usefulness in obtaining results and improving clinical care" to a database is an unfair barrier to market entry for a genetic test provider claiming to provide health benefits?
Come on. I agree that over-the-top regulations (e.g. barring a company from a offering a test unless it meets requirements for clinical validity) would be counter-productive, but providing accurate information to consumers to enable them to make a sound decision in a complex area is a Good Thing.
Posted by: Daniel MacArthur | June 26, 2009 11:07 AM
There is NO need for a government approved list at this time.
Unless "Genetic Alliance" discloses its sponsors, then I'm assuming it's another industry lobbying group doing what they do : spinning the public relations and buying protection.
Yes, they'd love to have government approval for their competitors. "Just fill out this 40 page questionnaire and we'll get back to you with a decision".
Where's the evidence that we NEED this at this time ?
Posted by: anomalous | June 26, 2009 4:56 PM
Hello 'anomalous',
Genetic Alliance is a 501 (c)(3) not-for-profit health advocacy organization. We were founded in 1986 as the Alliance for Genetic Support Groups, and are committed to transforming health through genetics. Our open network connects members of parent and family groups, community organizations, disease-specific advocacy organizations, professional societies, educational institutions, corporations, and government agencies to create novel partnerships. We actively engage in improving access to information for individuals, families and communities, while supporting the translation of research into services. We promote an environment of openness centered on the health of individuals, families, and communities. Openness forms both the process and product for Genetic Alliance.
Please visit our website at http://www.geneticalliance.org or email us at info@geneticalliance.org to find out more about our mission and goals.
Posted by: Genetic Alliance Staff | June 30, 2009 11:03 AM
GeneticAllianceStaff,
I'm glad your committed to open-ness. What percentage of you funding comes from corporations involved in biotech?
Posted by: anomalous | June 30, 2009 11:56 AM
Anomalous,
Less than 5% of Genetic Alliance's funding is from biotech/pharma. Please visit www.geneticalliance.org for more information.
Posted by: GeneticAllianceStaff | July 2, 2009 3:54 PM
GeneticAlliance Staff.
How about a specific URL? not the front page.
Posted by: anomalous | July 6, 2009 10:24 AM