Genetic Future
Commentary on human genetics and evolution, direct-to-consumer genetic testing, and the personal genomics industry.
Search
Profile
Daniel MacArthur
I write about the genetic and evolutionary basis of human variation, and the companies trying to sell you information about your genome.
Daniel also blogs about personal genomics at Genomes Unzipped.
Subscribe via RSS.
Follow me on Twitter.
Recent Posts
- Genetic Future is moving
- One more step towards the end of recessive diseases
- New FireFox plugin for 23andMe customers
- Why you CAN have your $1000 genome - so long as you learn what to do with it
- Bioscience Resource Project critique of modern genomics: a missed opportunity
- Genomes Unzipped reader survey
- News from 23andMe: a bigger chip, a new subscription model and another discount drive
- Why I'm releasing my genetic data online
- Oddities of the odds ratio
- Genetic Future is moving to Wired
Recent Comments
- Dan Frost on Genetic Future is moving
- Neil on One more step towards the end of recessive diseases
- Daniel MacArthur on One more step towards the end of recessive diseases
- Neil on One more step towards the end of recessive diseases
- Daniel MacArthur on One more step towards the end of recessive diseases
- Moreno on One more step towards the end of recessive diseases
- Bob on One more step towards the end of recessive diseases
- Neil on One more step towards the end of recessive diseases
- Jonathan on One more step towards the end of recessive diseases
- Daniel MacArthur on One more step towards the end of recessive diseases
Archives
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
Blogs I read:
Consumer Genomics:
Genomic Science:
- Anthony Fejes
- David Dooling
- Dan Koboldt
- Luke Jostins
- Pathogenomics
- Jan Aerts
- Popgen Ramblings
- Adaptive Complexity
- Genomicron
Genetics/Evolution Blogs:
- Razib Khan
- John Hawks
- Gene Expression
- Eye on DNA
- Dienekes
- Yann Klimentidis
- European Genetics
- Discovering Biology in a Digital World
- The Genetic Genealogist
- business|bytes|genes|molecules
- Thomas Mailund
- John Halamka
General Science:
Corporate Blogs:
Skeptics:
« The place to be on April 27th: the Genomes Environments Traits (GET) Conference | Main | Belated news from AGBT »
Complete Genomics announces 500 genomes in the pipeline
Category: agbt • complete genomics • conference blogging • next-generation sequencing • whole-genome sequencing
Posted on: February 22, 2010 3:45 PM, by Daniel MacArthur


Comments
Daniel:
Looking forward to your reportage from Marco Island.
BTW, Complete Genomics scaled back their goal to *only* 5K genomes this year.
http://www.genomeweb.com/sequencing/complete-genomics-delays-start-commercial-operations-q2-cuts-target-5000-genomes
Posted by: Keith Robison | February 22, 2010 4:09 PM
Hey Keith,
Thanks for that - I forgot all about their official downgrading. I've fixed up the post.
Posted by: Daniel MacArthur | February 22, 2010 10:38 PM
Totally unrelated, but I have a question about model organisms in genetics.
Bdelloid rotifers are able to incorporate foreign DNA into their genome. Given that this happens, what is their status as potential model organisms for genetic research? What are the pros and cons of using them to study mechanisms surrounding, say, recombination, or using them as genetic engineering model organisms?
Posted by: Katharine | February 23, 2010 1:07 PM
Um,
I guess Keith is right. GET may actually be the only conference with all the genomes ever done........
Maybe not. Time will tell. Will they really get 5000k full coverage, useful genomes?
-Steve
Posted by: Steven Murphy MD | February 23, 2010 9:01 PM
@Steve,
It will be a little tough to judge if they will truly get 5,000 full coverage genomes. Due to the nature of their business (selling services as opposed to instruments) there is no way to tell how many instruments they possess and what type of true scalability they have. Additionally, the sheer computing power to store and analyze 5,000 genomes in a year is mind-boggling. Approaching from just the storage angle, one would likely need somewhere from 5-30 TB (that's 5,000-30,000 GB) per genome (assuming 50X coverage) just to archive the data. Multiply that by 5,000 and one can begin to see the sheer scale needed to undertake such an ambitious project.
I, for one, will be interested to see if they can deliver.
Posted by: Jason | February 24, 2010 3:39 PM