Now on ScienceBlogs: HeartlandGate: Anti-Science Institute's Insider Reveals Secrets

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Genetic Future

Commentary on human genetics and evolution, direct-to-consumer genetic testing, and the personal genomics industry.

Search

Profile

Daniel MacArthur
I write about the genetic and evolutionary basis of human variation, and the companies trying to sell you information about your genome.

Daniel also blogs about personal genomics at Genomes Unzipped.

Subscribe via RSS.
Follow me on Twitter.

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogs I read:

Consumer Genomics:

Genomic Science:

Genetics/Evolution Blogs:

General Science:

Corporate Blogs:

Skeptics:

August 20, 2010

What the GAO report on genetic testing should have told us

Category: FDA

The recent Government Accountability Office report into the direct-to-consumer genetic testing industry certainly made a splash: it took centre stage at a Congressional hearing on the industry, and garnered media headlines about "bogus" results being generated by testing companies.As I...

Read on »

August 17, 2010

Ion Torrent bought by Life Technologies

Category: next-generation sequencing

In yet another twist in the unfolding competition for the emerging whole-genome sequencing market, promising new sequencing company Ion Torrent has been purchased by Life Technologies for $375 million. The stage is now set for a truly impressive battle between four major players over the next twelve months.

Read on »

August 16, 2010

Battle for the genome continues: Pacific Biosciences goes public

Category: next-generation sequencing

The long-awaited public stock offer from third-generation sequencing technology company Pacific Biosciences has finally arrived (here's the SEC filing, and coverage from Matthew Herper and GenomeWeb). PacBio has already raised almost US$400 million in venture capital, and aims to increase...

Read on »

August 9, 2010

The FDA doesn't plan to regulate access to raw genetic data; and context for Gutierrez scare-mongering about ovary removal

Category: FDA

An interview with two FDA officials in Newsweek reveals that the agency doesn't intend to regulate the release of raw genetic data to consumers - a reassuring outcome for genetic hobbyists. The interview also provides crucial context for a scare-mongering quote by official Alberto Gutierrez, apparently referring to the dangers of direct-to-consumer testing: turns out the tests Gutierrez referred to were neither direct-to-consumer nor genetic.

Read on »

August 5, 2010

Update on the chip supply rumour from the FDA

Category: direct-to-consumer genetic testing

Two days ago I reported a rumour that the FDA might have convinced genotyping chip provider Illumina to stop providing its products to direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies - a move that would effectively prevent these companies from being able to...

Read on »

August 4, 2010

Update: statement from 23andMe on Illumina chip supply rumours

Category: personal genomics

Following up on the rumours I posted about yesterday regarding a potential bid by the FDA to choke of direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies' supply of genotyping chips, I received the following statement by email from 23andMe's PR firm: 23andMe is...

Read on »

Is the FDA planning to strangle the supply lines of direct-to-consumer genomics companies?

Rumours are circulating that the US Food and Drug Administration has negotiated to cut off the supplies of genotyping chips to direct-to-consumer genetics companies. If true, this would put the industry completely at the mercy of whatever changes the regulators demand.

Read on »

August 2, 2010

Why I now pay for online news, in two words: Mark Henderson

The whole idea of actually paying to read mainstream news online is rather alien to me, having grown up immersed in a world of free content readily available via Google News. Indeed, I can't help but see free news as...

Read on »

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.