Now on ScienceBlogs: Let the War on Christmas Begin. Atheist style.

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Gene Expression

Human evolution, genetics, genomics and their interstices

tonee.jpg

Search this blog


Recent Comments

Archives

Categories

Q & A

Books

Blogroll

Recent Posts

« 10 Questions for A. W. F. Edwards | Main | Tour of the ScienceBlogs »

Voltron & evo psych  permlink

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/19884

Comments

1

Who are Voltrons?

Posted by: coturnix | August 28, 2006 1:17 PM

2

No, no, no. It was just that Lion Voltron split into five lions, all very balanced and symmetrical and equal, like a team should be. Car Voltron was just a mashed together pile of Transformers.

Posted by: speedwell | August 28, 2006 1:38 PM

3

My hunch is that our mammalian minds (we're all descended from rat-like critters) are hard-wired to recognize some basic "predator" shapes. One would be like a large stalking feline with eyes and teeth. Another would be a bird of prey sillouettte.

Especially the first seems to pop up all the time in childhood imaginative "monster fears." The second shows up in military symbols all the time.

Fun fact: cheetah originated in North America but were subsequently wiped out in their area of origin.

Posted by: NuSapiens | August 28, 2006 6:12 PM

4

I always thought that it was because lion Voltron maintained an inherently hegemonic and microfascistic grip on the marginalized car Voltron, subjugating his valid paradigm.

Posted by: Benjamin | August 29, 2006 1:35 AM

5

There is a very good paper adressing the question: why are some animal shapes more popular (in terms of cognitive, mythological, and google fame) than others? It was written by evolutionary psychologist Dan Sperber; you can find it there:
http://www.dan.sperber.com/hybrids.htm
Sperber's conclusion is that two categories of animal species are privileged: the perfect, archetypical ones (such as the lion ot he eagle), and the imaginary, hybrid ones, such as the Unicorn, provided they combine very characteristic featurs of two species (a horse + antler=unicorn ; typical human+typical fish = mermaid, etc.).

Sperber's paper helped found the cognitive anthropology of religion in its time; the basic idea is that succesful representations gain their success from recruiting the right modules in our evolved mind (hence the success of the lion) and from combining these evolved intuitions in counter-intutive ways (hence the unicorn).

Posted by: Olivier | August 29, 2006 7:05 AM

6

The car Voltron also had that lame "5 minutes of stored nuclear energy" thing that was always slowing it down.

And don't forget the little seen Gladiator Voltron.

http://www.voltronuniverse.com/gladiator.html

Posted by: Patrick | August 29, 2006 10:31 AM

7

All this mammalian race-memory stuff is just too rich.
1. You could actually SEE how the Lion Voltron fit together.
2. The lions, by themselves, were formiddable.
3. They were color-coded.
4. If your friend had the Lion Voltron toy, you could make the lions into the Voltron.
5. Et Cetera

Posted by: K-dog | May 2, 2007 2:51 PM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM