Now on ScienceBlogs: "Investigative science journalism" and books I like to read [All of My Faults Are Stress Related]

Seed Media Group

The Week In ScienceBlogs: Sign up for our newsletter.

Gene Expression

Human evolution, genetics, genomics and their interstices

yourhost.jpg
Wikio - Top Blogs - Sciences

Search

Recent Comments

Archives

Categories

Q & A

Books

Blogroll

Recent Posts

« Newsweek & Neandertals | Main | God & man at ScienceBlogs, stand and be counted! »

Blue eyes, why?  permlink

Category: Genetics StumbleUpon Toolbar Digg Reddit Del.icio.us
Posted on: November 20, 2006 12:31 PM, by Razib

I don't have time to comment in detail, but I thought I'd give readers a heads up, there is a preprint in The American Journal of Human Genetics which confirms that a few SNPs on one locus is responsible for 3/4 of the variation between blue and brown eyes in white populations. This locus, OCA2, is the third longest haplotype in the European genome from the HapMap sequence (the European HapMap data comes from Utah Mormons). The length of this haplotype is suggestive of recent strong positive selection within the European population (the further back in time and the weaker the selective event the more power recombination has to break up associations swept up during the sweep). OCA2 seems to have a relationship to skin color as well, though it is far weaker an effect (recall that we already know another locus in Europeans has an average effect of 25-38% of the variance between Europeans and Africans).

Comments

1

Who is "Chet Snicker", and what have you done with Razib?

Posted by: Mustafa Mond, FCD | November 20, 2006 4:23 PM

2

alas, see:

Chet Snicker: 1

White Male Patriarchy: 0

i was part of the WMP, so i had to go. but worry not, the game isn't over, we're only at halftime.

Posted by: razib | November 20, 2006 5:06 PM

3

Hey Razib -

Don't you think it's time you morphed into a black female for a while?

Posted by: Alan | November 20, 2006 10:03 PM

4

another minor quibble (then I'll post something relevant when I read the ajhg article) -- why "male patriarchy," unless there are female patriarchies? Words occupy prime real estate in slogans... maybe "white hetero patriachy" or "white bourgeois patriarchy," etc.

Posted by: Agnostic | November 20, 2006 11:13 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Advertisement

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM