A few days ago I posted on a gene, HMGA2, which seems to be implicated in a small proportion of the normal human variation in height. There seems to be an SNP which comes in two flavors which results in a different in height in an additive & independent manner. A friend of mine pointed out that this SNP exhibits different frequencies in different populations. The "short" allele, which tends to have an average effect of decreasing the expectation in height, is the derived form. That is, it is a newer mutant in relation to the ancestral "tall" allele. Second, it seems that it is extant at a much higher frequency in East Asians than amongst Europeans and Africans. I won't repeat the evolutionary speculations I offered in my previous post, but it seems clear that small chunks of data such as this will be fertile seed for future conjecture and model building.
Gene Expression
Human evolution, genetics, genomics and their interstices
Search this blog
Recent Comments
- razib on Why science fiction was better in the past
- fullerenedream on Why science fiction was better in the past
- Thorfinn on Why science fiction was better in the past
- gcochran on Why science fiction was better in the past
- Nina P on When mammoths roamed
- bioIgnoramus on Chinese propensity to copy
- zyxwvutsr on Katz
- bioIgnoramus on When mammoths roamed
- Susannah on Katz
- katfotog on Katz
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
Categories
- Anthroplogy
- Ask a ScienceBlogger
- Biology
- Blog
- Cognitive Science
- Culture
- Economics
- Environment
- History
- International Affairs
- Medicine
- Politics
- Psychology
- Religion
- Science
- Space
- Technology
- Transhumanism
- philosophy
Q & A
- Parag Khanna
- James Flynn
- Jon Entine
- Gregory Clark
- György Buzsáki
- Heather Mac Donald
- Bruce Lahn
- A.W.F. Edwards
- Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza
- Joseph LeDoux
- Matthew Stewart
- Charles Murray
- Steven Pinker
- James F. Crow
- Adam K. Webb
- Justin L. Barrett
- David Haig
- Judith Rich Harris
- Ken Miller
- Dan Sperber
- Warren Treadgold
- Armand M. Leroi
- John Derbyshire
Books
- Principles of Population Genetics
- Genetics of Populations
- Molecular Evolution
- Quantitative Genetics
- Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics
- Evolutionary Genetics
- Evolution
- Molecular Markers, Natural History, and Evolution
- The Genetics of Human Populations
- Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits
- Epistasis and Evolutionary Process
- Evolutionary Human Genetics
- Biometry
- Mathematical Models in Biology
- Speciation
- Evolutionary Genetics: Case Studies and Concepts
- Narrow Roads of Gene Land 1
- Narrow Roads of Gene Land 2
- Narrow Roads of Gene Land 3
- Statistical Methods in Molecular Evolution
- The History and Geography of Human Genes
- Population Genetics and Microevolutionary Theory
- Population Genetics, Molecular Evolution, and the Neutral Theory
- Genetical Theory of Natural Selection
- Evolution and the Genetics of Populations
- Genetics and Origins of Species
- Tempo and Mode in Evolution
- Causes of Evolution
- Evolution
- The Great Human Diasporas
- Bones, Stones and Molecules
- Natural Selection and Social Theory
- Journey of Man
- Mapping Human History
- The Seven Daughters of Eve
- Evolution for Everyone
- Why Sex Matters
- Mother Nature
- Grooming, Gossip, and the Evolution of Language
- Genome
- R.A. Fisher, the Life of a Scientist
- Sewall Wright and Evolutionary Biology
- Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics
- A Reason for Everything
- The Ancestor's Tale
- Dragon Bone Hill
- Endless Forms Most Beautiful
- The Selfish Gene
- Adaptation and Natural Selection
- Nature via Nurture
- The Symbolic Species
- The Imitation Factor
- The Red Queen
- Out of Thin Air
- Mutants
- Evolutionary Dynamics
- The Origin of Species
- The Descent of Man
- Age of Abundance
- The Darwin Wars
- The Evolutionists
- The Creationists
- Of Moths and Men The Language Instinct
- How We Decide
- Predictably Irrational
- The Black Swan
- Fooled By Randomness
- Descartes' Baby
- Religion Explained
- In Gods We Trust
- Darwin's Cathedral
- A Theory of Religion
- The Meme Machine
- Synaptic Self
- The Mating Mind
- A Separate Creation
- The Number Sense
- The 10,000 Year Explosion
- The Math Gene
- Explaining Culture
- Origin and Evolution of Cultures
- Dawn of Human Culture
- The Origins of Virtue
- Prehistory of the Mind
- The Nurture Assumption
- The Moral Animal
- Born That Way
- No Two Alike
- Sociobiology
- Survival of the Prettiest
- The Blank Slate
- The g Factor
- The Origin Of The Mind
- Unto Others
- Defenders of the Truth
- The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition
- Before the Dawn
- Behavioral Genetics in the Postgenomic Era
- The Essential Difference
- Geography of Thought
- The Classical World
- The Fall of the Roman Empire
- The Fall of Rome
- History of Rome
- How Rome Fell
- The Making of a Christian Aristoracy
- The Rise of Western Christendom
- Keepers of the Keys of Heaven
- A History of the Byzantine State and Society
- Europe After Rome
- The Germanization of Early Medieval Christianity
- The Barbarian Conversion
- A History of Christianity
- God's War
- Infidels
- Fourth Crusade and the Sack of Constantinople
- The Sacred Chain
- Divided by the Faith
- Europe
- The Reformation
- Pursuit of Glory
- Albion's Seed
- 1848
- Postwar
- From Plato to Nato
- China: A New History
- China in World History
- Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World
- Children of the Revolution
- When Baghdad Ruled the Muslim World
- The Great Arab Conquests
- After Tamerlane
- A History of Iran
- The Horse, the Wheel, and Language
- A World History
- Guns, Germs, and Steel
- The Human Web
- Plagues and Peoples
- 1491
- A Concise Economic History of the World
- Power and Plenty
- A Splendid Exchange
- Contours of the World Economy 1-2030 AD
- Knowledge and the Wealth of Nations
- A Farewell to Alms
- The Ascent of Money
- The Great Divergence
- Clash of Extremes
- War and Peace and War
- Historical Dynamics
- The Age of Lincoln
- The Great Upheaval
- What Hath God Wrought
- Freedom Just Around the Corner
- Throes of Democracy
- Grand New Party
- A Beautiful Math
- When Genius Failed
- Catholicism and Freedom
- American Judaism
Blogroll
- GNXP Classic
-
- Razib Khan
- Razib at Comment is Free
- OneSTDV
- Beta Revolution
- Your Religion Is False
- Arikia Millikan
- Upturned Earth
- Hyena Con
- Mark Wethman
- Secular Right
- Talk Islam
- Stuff Scientists Like
- Dan MacArthur
- Chet Snicker
- Matt
- John Hawks
- The American Scene
- Dienekes
- Hsien-Hsien Lei
- Ruchira Paul
- Steve Sailer
- Jason Soon
- Michael & co.
- John Emerson
- Sepia Mutiny
- Agnostic
Recent Posts
- Why science fiction was better in the past
- Chinese propensity to copy
- When mammoths roamed
- Katz
- The Faith Instinct: How Religion Evolved & Why It Endures
- Firelight
- Ancient DNA & the moa
- Evolution, the Muslim world & religious beliefs
- Charles Darwin was quite the infidel
- From population genetics to linguistics
« Larry Craig, making a difference | Main | Why brown people are different shades of brown.... »
Why Asians are so short (perhaps) permlink
Find more posts in:
Life Science
Medicine & Health
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
Posted on: September 6, 2007 9:59 AM, by Razib KhanFind more posts in:
Life Science
Medicine & Health
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More




Comments
Maybe shorter people are more able to keep their balance on horses, the better to decimate a sedentary population and make off with their women.
Posted by: agnostic | September 6, 2007 11:15 AM
Three centuries ago, the Scots were short people. Now they're tall. It's got to be the diet.
I live in Alhambra, California, which has a sizeable community of Chinese descent. The oldsters tend to be short, the kids not. It's got to be the diet.
Posted by: CRM-114 | September 6, 2007 12:43 PM
I live in Alhambra, California, which has a sizeable community of Chinese descent. The oldsters tend to be short, the kids not. It's got to be the diet
are they as tall as whites and blacks? is that the diet?
Posted by: razib | September 6, 2007 1:36 PM
Adopted Koreans (and other Asian groups) do not grow as tall (or fat) as their white siblings. Perhaps they were 'undernourished' in the womb or some such, but then why do they do better at school, etc?
Posted by: Jason Malloy | September 6, 2007 3:40 PM
Lactose intolerance too.
Posted by: cuchulkhan | September 6, 2007 3:55 PM
Lactose intolerance too.
the traits aren't analogous though. LI is a single locus mendelian trait. height is a quantitative trait with no locus of large effect an a large fraction of potential environmental variance. the adoption studies are the clinchers though; some argue that diff. east asian diet is the reason behind the shorter heights of modern japanese, but obviously not as much of an issue with korean adoptees.
Posted by: razib | September 6, 2007 3:59 PM
Plus, why do Af-Ams, who are also more likely than Whites to be LI, grow taller than Whites or Asians? And Asians are more likely to eat healthier food, and Af-Ams more likely to eat junk.
Posted by: agnostic | September 6, 2007 6:32 PM
Plus, why do Af-Ams, who are also more likely than Whites to be LI, grow taller than Whites or Asians?
last i checked the growth charts they were about the same height as american whites.
Posted by: razib | September 6, 2007 6:55 PM
height is a quantitative trait with no locus of large effect
Mbuti what about the pygmies?
Posted by: hip hip array | September 6, 2007 8:17 PM
Mbuti what about the pygmies?
same. they aren't like dwarves from what i know. probably lots of loci of small effect.
Posted by: razib | September 6, 2007 8:27 PM
I grew up in a Chinese/Vietnamese enclave in the bay area, so about half the kids I grew up with were Asian like me. I'd say diet is the biggest factor. My diet was equal parts cheeseburgers and pho, and I ended up six feet tall, 4" taller than my dad, and both of my sisters are 5" taller than mom, who is a wee 4'11". But Asian guys taller than 6'2" are very rare, probably as unlikely as a white guy over 6'5".
Lactose intolerance doesn't seem to be a huge issue. In elementary school all the kids drank their chocolate milk every day, and in college, like 3/4 of my asian friends drank milk without a problem. The asian glow was much more prevalent. I'm 21 and it was only two years ago that dairy started giving me the runs.
Posted by: James | September 6, 2007 9:02 PM
re: LP, the bigger issue that people don't get full nutritive value (about 1/3) cuz of no lactase.
Posted by: razib | September 6, 2007 9:05 PM
Its probably a mixture of genes and diet. I'm from a relatively prosperous asian nation whose traditional fare are really tasty, but usually only made up of carbo and fats. I'm 19 this year, 5'11, and thats pretty much average amongst the younger crowd. Most of the older generation asians(that lived through hard times) are shorter, averaging about 5'7, with the world war 2 generation at about 5'4.
However i must hightlight that, while the average height of teenagers here may be close to average american height, the number of kids who hit 6'5 or more are like one in every hundred.
Posted by: Lixing | November 10, 2007 11:53 AM
I lived about 15 years in Japan. In public I always towered over men of my generation, but the high school kids looked me in the eye.
One funny thing, it seemed to me that the girls, that is late teens and 20s, had gained more height than the young boys. There seemed to be lots of really tall girls around.
The traditional Japanese diet is severely deficient in certain nutrients, but the younger generation is growing up on Macs. Don't know how tall they will end up, but lots taller than previous generations.
Posted by: tom bri | November 11, 2007 8:40 AM
do calcium intake has any effect on height? I mean, are Americans taller because they consume more calcium than Asians do? I'm so curious about this
thanks
Posted by: kp | September 3, 2009 5:25 AM
The Asian diet, if it contains seafood, tofu and vegetables is actually richer and healthier than the typical North American Diet. Seaweed, tofu are actually excellent sources of protein and minerals. The main reason why people think protein ie: hamburgers is making them bigger and taller is : growth hormone. Hormones found in beef and chicken is making a whole generation of men/women grow faster and bigger.Also, hormones are found in dairy products also ( cheese, milk).So, my guess is DIET but it's the growth hormone not the protein, necessarily.
Posted by: sg | November 19, 2009 3:28 PM