Official Comment Count: 1,026,444
Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.
« Drugs that make you smart? | Main | Want sons? Eat well! »
Obama & McCain & Clinton on autism permlink
Category: Science
Posted on: April 22, 2008 2:27 PM, by Razib
Seems like both the Republican nominee and the likely Democratic nominee entertain the autism and vaccination "hypothesis". I don't follow politics very closely, this sort of comment really disturbs me....
Via TNR.
Update: And Clinton too.
Update II: Insolence & Aetiology have more.
Find more posts in: 
Medicine & Health
YES! Send me a free issue of Seed.
If I like what I see, I'll receive 5 more issues (6 in all) for just $14.95. That's 50% off the cover price! If I'm not completely satisfied, I'll simply write "cancel" on the invoice and owe nothing. The free issue is mine to keep.
(Non-U.S. subscribers, click here.)
Comments
I find this disturbing too. However I find McCain's "there's strong evidence that indicates it's got to do with a preservative in vaccines", which is just patently false, much, much more disturbing than Obama's "some people are suspicious", which is in fact true, even if those people are wrong. Clinton's is more disturbing than both in a way in that the other two were off-the-cuff comments, while Clinton's was an actual, though out response.
Posted by: Dr. Octoploid | April 24, 2008 12:55 AM
Yes, Obama, Clinton, and McCain have all fallen victim to the scientific-ish meme that vaccine = autism.
.
This meme, along with the absolutely terrible research linking early TV viewing to autism (I blogged about that here: http://science4non-majors.blogspot.com/2006/10/spectrum-of-autism-research-from.html ), both play into the superstitious belief that (1) those parents did something wrong, and that's why their children are cursed with autism (and I use "cursed" in the superstitious sense,) and (2) if I as a parent do not do the wrong thing, my child will be protected.
.
Unfortunately, these two false ideas run rampant, because they both suggest that you can somehow protect your child or, in this case, that better government can somehow protect children.
.
More research is needed. In that, all three candidates are correct.
.
TK Kenyon
www.tkkenyon.com , http://science4non-majors.blogspot.com/
Author of RABID ( http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1601640021 ) and CALLOUS ( http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1601640226 ): Two novels about science and religion, with some sex and murder.
Posted by: TK Kenyon | April 24, 2008 12:22 PM
Credit where credit is due: Upon further research, it's worth noting that Obama's "This person included" reference clearly refers to the person next to him, not himself, if you watch the video.
Posted by: Dr. Octoploid | April 25, 2008 1:28 AM
I've always wondered if the fact that the diagnosis for autism in an infant is kinda iffy is the problem here. It's hard to diagnose a mental or behavioral disorder in a grown person much less a child.
Posted by: Michael | April 25, 2008 2:25 AM
Just to be clear on the politics, the votes are in promoting the link, so no shock.
As per Dr. Octoploid's first comment, McCain is the heavy duty panderer here. Kind of like his gas tax break which nobody who knows anything about the topic supports. (In that case, Clinton jumped on board with at least equal fervor. Obama, to his credit, took the high road on that one.)
Posted by: Crust | May 2, 2008 3:22 PM