Now on ScienceBlogs: The Australian's War on Science 41

Seed Media Group

Gene Expression

Human evolution, genetics, genomics and their interstices

tonee.jpg

Search

Recent Comments

Archives

Categories

Q & A

Books

Blogroll

Recent Posts

« Steven Pinker interview | Main | Black, but how black? »

The American professoriate: godless liberals?  permlink

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

Posted on: June 21, 2008 2:36 AM, by Razib Khan

In short, liberal, yes, but godless, far less so. Religious Beliefs and Behavior of College Faculty:

Faculty are, however, not monolithic. There are divisions among faculty ranks. Science and math faculty are the least religious in belief and behavior. Business faculty are the most conservative and most religious. Humanities faculty, though the most politically liberal, are not less religious than other faculty and on some measures are more religious. Faculty, while less religious than the general population, are complex in their religiosity.


Am I the only one who has had the experience of a non-science background friend who is surprised that I'm not terrified by the idea of fish genes being spliced into tomatoes? In other words, yes, a modern liberal arts education might make one more skeptical of conventional "mainstream" world-views, but that skepticism is often not complemented much with a commitment toward rational & empirical analysis of the issues at hand. So naturally intuitive morality with roots in our cognitive hardware kick in.

Most interesting figures below the fold....

fac1fig1.jpg

fac1fig2.jpg

fac1fig5.jpg

The 19% of definitional (as opposed to identifed) atheists is probably an underestimate. From page 27:

We can conclude that those who did not answer are more likely to answer that they do not believe in God. The overall proportion of atheists among the faculty as a whole is actually more like 24% than the 19% shown by those who answered affirmatively.

fac1fig7.jpg

fac1fig37.jpg

The fact that non-Evangelical Protestants are not noticeably underrepresented, while Evangelical Protestants are, should not surprise if you keep in mind that there are simply fewer academic caliber minds among Evangelicals. 3% of the faculty sample consisted of Unitarians, around 0.2% of the American population. So this group is 15 times more represented in the faculty than in the general population. Of course, you know that Unitarians are probably the smartest religious group in the United States. In any case, the survey apparently had an N of around 1,300.

(H/T Volokh Conspiracy)

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

Comments

1

Some organization surveys members of the NAS every 10 years or so. Only about 40% of the members report some sort of religious feeling. Significantly, this drops to around 4% of biologists, all of whom are Darwinists.

Posted by: Bob S | June 21, 2008 9:14 AM

2

I am not clear (from looking at the methods section) what kinds of institution were included in the sampling frame. Are these all faculty from 4 year colleges, or does the sample include community colleges?

Posted by: BGC | June 21, 2008 9:44 AM

3

You're wrong to the stats, Bob. Physical scientists and biologists in the NAS are almost indistinguishable in this regard:

http://www.stephenjaygould.org/ctrl/news/file002.html

Posted by: Russell | June 21, 2008 9:51 AM

4

Any ideas, for the purposes of this study anyway, what the difference is between "atheist" and "no religion"?

Posted by: Dr. Free-Ride | June 21, 2008 11:04 AM

5

The personal relationship with God is controversial in many mainline denominations. From the numbers it seems that a lot of mainline Christians are sliding in a Pentecostal, evangelical, or charismatic direction.

Posted by: John Emerson | June 21, 2008 11:04 AM

6

@Dr. Free-Ride: Regardiing...

"Any ideas, for the purposes of this study anyway, what the difference is between "atheist" and "no religion"?"

My guess would be that "no relgion" could be that a person believes in God, but does not follow any "religion" beyond that.

(Where an Atheist is a person who either does not believe in god, or neither believes nor disbelieves in God. I.e., they either disbelieve or are undecided.)

-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux
http://changelog.ca/

Posted by: Charles Iliya Krempeaux | June 21, 2008 5:27 PM

7

My guess would be that "no relgion" could be that a person believes in God, but does not follow any "religion" beyond that.

yes. in most general population surveys only about 40% of those with "no religion" are atheists or agnostics; the rest are theists or deists. in this survey it seems that "no religion" would just be the residual after you remove self-identified atheists and those with religious identification. that is, theists with no religious identification.

Posted by: razib | June 21, 2008 8:54 PM

8

Are these all faculty from 4 year colleges, or does the sample include community colleges?

only 4 year from what i can see.

Posted by: razib | June 22, 2008 12:32 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Enter to win

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM