Now on ScienceBlogs: Open Lab: Time is Ticking!

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Gene Expression

Human evolution, genetics, genomics and their interstices

tonee.jpg

Search this blog


Recent Comments

Archives

Categories

Q & A

Books

Blogroll

Recent Posts

« War and the evolution of belligerence and bravery | Main | Barack Obama's answers to the top 14 science questions facing America »

Sarah Palin, 14% chance of Presidency 2009-2013?  permlink

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

Posted on: August 30, 2008 1:48 AM, by Razib Khan

Seems like there's a 14% chance that if the Republicans keep the White House this year that Sarah Palin will be President of the United States in the interval 2009-2013. Of course, you could modulate the probability up or down based on plugging in more priors into the model, but I think it gives a rough qualitative sense.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

Comments

1

Stop making eyes at her 6mth old.

Posted by: eddie | August 30, 2008 10:55 AM

2

"you could modulate the probability up or down based on plugging in more priors"

The risk of a president being murdered is so much higher than for a random member of the public that I think it would need to be included in any calculation. Around 7% or presidential terms feature an assasination.

Posted by: Ross | August 30, 2008 12:06 PM

3
The risk of a president being murdered is so much higher than for a random member of the public

Is that actually true? The rest of us don't have the Secret Service. (And neither did Lincoln or McKinley.)

Even if it is true, the risk of a president dying of malnutrition, exposure, treatable diseases, etc. is much, much lower than for the average member of the public.

Posted by: Mike Keesey | August 30, 2008 12:16 PM

4


Yes, Presidents routinely escape the recurrent famines sweeping over North America.

Posted by: gcochran | August 30, 2008 12:42 PM

5

This is way wrong. Everyone knows that the presidency ages a person by 20 years. McCain would not be 80 at the end of an 8 year term. He'll be 100 (in president years, like dog years).

Posted by: greg laden | August 30, 2008 4:57 PM

6

good point. look at the life expectancies after the presidency of our recent ones; e.g., nixon, ford, carter, reagen and g hw bush. :-)

Posted by: razib | August 30, 2008 5:04 PM

7

I was actually thinking about looking that up.

Posted by: greg laden | August 30, 2008 9:04 PM

8

Re risk of presidential assassination: The US Secret Service assumed full-time responsibility for protecting the president in 1902 (after McKinley was assassinated). There have been 16 assassination attempts against the 18 presidents since then, of which one was successful (Kennedy), two others resulted in the president being wounded but surviving (Theodore Roosevelt and Reagan), and three others involved shots being fired in close proximity to the president (FDR, Truman, and Ford).

So I think you could easily add a few per cent chance of a given president being killed or seriously incapacitated by an assassination attempt during his/her term in office. This is easily an order of magnitude or more than similar probabilities for the average US citizen (based on FBI statistics on murder, etc.).

Posted by: dev | August 30, 2008 9:56 PM

9

Now that I think about it, if you add in the probability of McCain being assassinated or seriously incapacitated by an assassination attempt, the odds of Palin becoming president would probably be equal to or greater than the odds in Russian roulette -- which I guess gives some idea as to McCain's appetite for risk.

Posted by: dev | August 30, 2008 10:11 PM

10

The most important prior of course is current health. Many of the people who are within 4 years of death have one foot in the grave already because of heart disease, etc. I would expect a better outlook for someone as robust and sprightly (relatively speaking) as McCain.

Posted by: Phiz | August 31, 2008 4:34 AM

11

you could modulate the probability up or down based on plugging in more priors

Throw in the other John Sidneys and it might be a wash.

JSM II: 70
JSM I: 61

Posted by: Jason Malloy | September 2, 2008 4:10 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM