John McCain Answers Science Debate 2008. Compare with Obama's side by side.
Search this blog
Recent Posts
- In Defense of Monogamy!
- Yankees, Catholics and Southerners
- We have the technology; we can ressurect them!
- Should we know presidential candidates' genomes?
- The Lost White Civilization of China
- Immigration & DNA testing
- Correlation between wine quality and price negative?
- Vote for Obama vs. % black in county (all states)
- The mists of the adaptive fog
- Down with historical whiggishness!
Recent Comments
- Sigmund on Yankees, Catholics and Southerners
- Mark Houston on The Lost White Civilization of China
- Mark Houston on The Lost White Civilization of China
- Josh on We have the technology; we can ressurect them!
- tom bri on We have the technology; we can ressurect them!
- brooks on We have the technology; we can ressurect them!
- dearieme on We have the technology; we can ressurect them!
- Donna B. on Should we know presidential candidates' genomes?
- Don on The Lost White Civilization of China
- ChrisitanK on We have the technology; we can ressurect them!
Archives
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
Categories
- Anthroplogy
- Ask a ScienceBlogger
- Biology
- Blog
- Cognitive Science
- Culture
- History
- Politics
- Psychology
- Religion
- Science
- Space
- Technology
- Transhumanism
- philosophy
Blogroll
- GNXP Classic
- Talk Islam
- Stuff Scientists Like
- Dan MacArthur
- Chet Snicker
- Matt
- John Hawks
- The American Scene
- Dienekes
- Hsien-Hsien Lei
- Ruchira Paul
- Steve Sailer
- Jason Soon
- Michael & co.
- John Emerson
- Sepia Mutiny
- Agnostic
Q & A
- Parag Khanna
- James Flynn
- Jon Entine
- Gregory Clark
- György Buzsáki
- Heather Mac Donald
- Bruce Lahn
- A.W.F. Edwards
- Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza
- Joseph LeDoux
- Matthew Stewart
- Charles Murray
- Steven Pinker
- James F. Crow
- Adam K. Webb
- Justin L. Barrett
- David Haig
- Judith Rich Harris
- Ken Miller
- Dan Sperber
- Warren Treadgold
- Armand M. Leroi
- John Derbyshire
Books
- Genetics & evolution texts
- Principles of Population Genetics
- Genetics of Populations
- Molecular Evolution
- Quantitative Genetics
- Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics
- Evolutionary Genetics
- Evolution
- Molecular Markers, Natural History, and Evolution
- The Genetics of Human Populations
- Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits
- Epistasis and Evolutionary Process
- Evolutionary Human Genetics
- Biometry
- Mathematical Models in Biology
- Speciation
- Genetics & evolution
- Narrow Roads of Gene Land I
- Narrow Roads of Gene Land II
- The History and Geography of Human Genes
- Population Genetics, Molecular Evolution, and the Neutral Theory
- Evolution
- The Great Human Diasporas
- Bones, Stones and Molecules
- Journey of Man
- Mapping Human History
- The Seven Daughters of Eve
- Why Sex Matters
- Mother Nature
- Grooming, Gossip, and the Evolution of Language
- Genome
- The Ancestor's Tale
- Dragon Bone Hill
- Endless Forms Most Beautiful
- The Selfish Gene
- Nature Via Nurture
- The Symbolic Species
- The Imitation Factor
- The Red Queen
- Mutants
- Genetics & evolution classics
- The Origin of Species
- The Descent of Man
- Genetical Theory of Natural Selection
- Evolution and the Genetics of Populations
- Genetics and Origins of Species
- Tempo and Mode in Evolution
- Causes of Evolution
- (Bio)Social Science
- The Language Instinct
- Religion Explained
- Descartes' Baby
- Natural Selection and Social Theory
- Darwin's Cathedral
- The Meme Machine
- Synaptic Self
- The Mating Mind
- A Separate Creation
- The Number Sense
- The Math Gene
- The Origins of Virtue
- Prehistory of the Mind
- In Gods We Trust
- The Nurture Assumption
- The Moral Animal
- Born That Way
- Sociobiology
- Survival of the Prettiest
- The Blank Slate
- The g Factor
- The Origin Of The Mind
- Unto Others
- Defenders of the Truth
- The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition
- Behavioral Genetics in the Postgenomic Era
- The Essential Difference
- Geography of Thought
- Explaining Culture
- History
- The Human Web
- From Plato to Nato
- China: A New History
- The Reformation
- Albion's Seed
- Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World
- History of Rome
- A History of the Byzantine State and Society
- Infidels
- Fourth Crusade and the Sack of Constantinople
- A World History
- Guns, Germs, and Steel
- Catholicism and Freedom
- American Judaism
- R.A. Fisher, the Life of a Scientist
- Sewall Wright and Evolutionary Biology
- A Reason for Everything
- The Darwin Wars
- The Evolutionists
- The Creationists
- Of Moths and Men
- Politics
- Libertarianism : A Primer
- A Theory of Justice
- Anarchy, State and Utopia
Subscribe via Email
Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.
« The genetics of Fenno-Scandinavia | Main | Equality is good for George W. Bush? »
John McCain Answers Science Debate 2008 permlink
Category: Politics
Posted on: September 15, 2008 1:50 PM, by Razib
Find more posts in: 
Politics
Comments
I find it interesting that McCain says that he opposes "wasteful earmarks" when instead the funds can be used for research, while it was a research plan (the study about bears) that he gave as his prime example of "wasteful earmarks" at his VP announcement. Maybe he was for it before he was against it.
Posted by: prelevent | September 15, 2008 3:12 PM
I suspect it's the problem of one person seeing research as useful and another as wasteful. Deciding what to fund or not and what is wasteful or not is tricky. For instance one person might argue you could fund a hell of a lot of mathematicians for the price of an accelerator trying to track down the higgs boson. Is one more valuable than the other?
I don't know how to make that decision despite having been on teams getting millions of dollars of government grants for research I found frankly wasteful.
It's not just science research though. Even a lot of government "pork" can be seen as helpful or not. Obviously a lot of Alaskans thought the "bridge to nowhere" wasn't pork but many of us down here to the south did. I recall a great NPR show that looked at examples of pork and tracked down the defenders. There's a lot of subjective judgment in all this. (Just as it is in your own personal budgets - what is wasteful spending and what is valuable?)
Posted by: Clark | September 16, 2008 11:22 PM