Now on ScienceBlogs: Unscientific America: Are scientists all on the same team? [Adventures in Ethics and Science]

Seed Media Group

More ScienceBlogs: Last 24 HoursLife SciencePhysical ScienceEnvironmentHumanitiesEducationPoliticsMedicineBrain & BehaviorTechnologyInformation ScienceJobs

The Week In ScienceBlogs: Sign up for our newsletter.

Gene Expression

Human evolution, genetics, genomics and their interstices

yourhost.jpg
Wikio - Top Blogs - Sciences

Search

Recent Comments

Archives

Categories

Q & A

Books

Blogroll

Recent Posts

« The Transparent Society makes religion obsolete? | Main | More fat is less food? »

Human behavior; no more models please!!!  permlink

Category: Culture StumbleUpon Toolbar Digg Reddit Del.icio.us
Posted on: October 9, 2008 4:07 PM, by Razib

There's a new paper out which models human behavioral ecology, Dynamics of Alliance Formation and the Egalitarian Revolution. Anthropology.net has a good review, so I'll just point you there. I was going to read this paper, and a few others on models of human group dynamics...but lately, I've been wondering, aren't there enough models now??? It seems like there is a large sample space of models which can generate a set of testable predictions. Perhaps it is time to catch up on data and experiment and hold off on more model generation? I'll probably keep reading these papers...but of late I've started to get the feeling that without more data the task of understanding human behavioral history is Sisyphean.

Comments

1

Is it time for a meta-model, a model-of-models?

Posted by: Coturnix | October 9, 2008 5:07 PM

2

My feeling is the opposite -- there's too much data and no modelers trying to see what it says. That's not incompatible with what you're saying -- basically, the two types work independently of each other.

Posted by: agnostic | October 9, 2008 8:24 PM

3

yeah, you both are on to something. mostly i'm just tired of a priori models.

Posted by: razib | October 9, 2008 8:38 PM

4

I guess "models" is just another Thing That Scientists Like... ;)

Posted by: toto | October 10, 2008 11:57 AM

5

I guess "models" is just another Thing That Scientists Like

Some of us... and some hate them. Just collect a bunch of data and publish it -- no hypotheses tested, no models to organize the mess.

Posted by: agnostic | October 10, 2008 3:28 PM

6

Some like to test narrow hypotheses and focus more on experimental models, others are more interested in directing their investigations (and experiments) into how the topic fits together. That interest can change depending on the state of the field. Many social science topics aren't at a point where the overarching models come into contact with basic experimental findings. I think it's for good reasons among the bad.

Posted by: quidnunc | October 10, 2008 5:00 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement

Science News from NYTimes.com »

From NYTimes.com

Latest science stories | More at nytimes.com

  1. 1Craft Docks; Astronauts Number 13 on Station

    11:11 PM, 07.17.2009

  2. 2New NASA Photos Show Apollo Leftovers on the Moon

    9:40 PM, 07.17.2009

  3. 3Peeling Back Pavement to Expose Watery Havens

    4:49 AM, 07.17.2009

  4. 4Saharan Lizard Swims Through Sand

    1:13 AM, 07.17.2009

  5. 5Observatory: Tiger Moths Jam Bat Sonar

    1:13 AM, 07.17.2009

Advertisement

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM