Gene Expression

Whither the cloud?

New Nail in Google Cloud Coffin:

Here’s what Google fears: If its cloud-computing system crashes, or inadvertently lets companies view their rivals’ confidential documents all over the world, the entire system of cloud-based business-information processing collapses. Companies’ most precious secrets are leaked, as are government files; suddenly, your tax history is available for anyone to read. The world’s governments and businesses panic and come fleeing back to software that is embedded in individual computers, but not before incalculable damage is done to the modern economy and the privacy rights of ordinary citizens.

Lately, the latter scenario’s been getting a little more likely. Last year, Gmail crashed three times, and Google Docs, the service that migrates word-processing and spreadsheet documents onto the cloud, crashed in July. In February, the company’s gmail froze for several hours, right in the middle of the business day in Europe. Earlier this month, a small percentage of word-processing documents were made available to people who shouldn’t have access to them. If people can’t guarantee that their private documents will stay private, they may never join the cloud utopia.

“Too Big To Fail” anyone? When it comes to something like gaming I can envisage consoles disappearing. You might get angry if your cable service goes down, but it isn’t “mission critical.” If Google Docs becomes ubiquitous in the office it seems like it is very amenable to the Black Swan criticism.

Comments

  1. #1 Matthew Platte
    March 26, 2009

    You’re familiar with spam, right? Much of that comes from compromised Windows PCs in ordinary people’s homes. Spam is thus a good illustration of one aspect of the Internet that gets overlooked too much: everyone can have their own server on the Internet. Indeed, I have several. And I still don’t fully understand the obsession with GMail and all things Googly.

  2. #2 jay
    March 26, 2009

    The company I work for is quite leery of outsourcing data. Some machines exist on subcontractor’s sites, but the corporate IT maintains full control over them.

    Crashes, attacks, subversion… all these are very real risks.

  3. #3 bioIgnoramus
    March 26, 2009

    Gosh, do you remember when “personal computers” really were personal?

    P.S. Now, young Khan, do you know that you are the subject of a Derbatribe? http://www.johnderbyshire.com/Opinions/RadioDerb/2009-03-20.html

  4. #4 Toaster
    March 26, 2009

    The department I work for has a research data cloud where all the labs can offsource their data. The server farm, from what I understand, is in house and has physical tape backups. Data is too expensive to make to lose.

  5. #5 Clark Goble
    March 27, 2009

    There are good reasons to use “cloud computer” (man I hate that name – what happened to client-server?) However relying wholly on it can be a disaster (IMO). I think being able to work offline is a huge benefit.

  6. #6 razib
    March 27, 2009

    There are good reasons to use “cloud computer” (man I hate that name – what happened to client-server?) However relying wholly on it can be a disaster (IMO). I think being able to work offline is a huge benefit.

    yeah. it seems that even laptops (e.g., netbooks) are now so cheap that you can have it both ways.

The site is undergoing maintenance presently. Commenting has been disabled. Please check back later!