Bad Probability:
Category: Bad Probability
I know that I just posted a link to a stupid religious argument, but I was sent a link to another one, which I can't resist mocking. As I've written about quite often, we humans really stink at understanding...
Read on »
Posted by Mark C. Chu-Carroll at 8:34 PM • 68 Comments •
Category: Add category
As you've surely heard by now, on christmas day, some idiot attempted to blow up an airplane by stuffing his underwear full of explosives and then lighting his crotch on fire. There's been a ton of coverage of this...
Read on »
Posted by Mark C. Chu-Carroll at 11:34 AM • 31 Comments •
Category: Bad Probability
I normally try to ignore things like this, but this is just too funny. In general, I find arguments like this to be extremely silly. This is, basically, like playing with gematria - only instead of doing real gematria...
Read on »
Posted by Mark C. Chu-Carroll at 3:29 PM • 101 Comments •
Category: Bad Probability
Via the Bad Astronomer comes one of the most pathetic abuses of probability that I've ever seen. I'm simply amazed that this idiot was willing to go on television and say this. The Daily Show With Jon StewartM -...
Read on »
Posted by Mark C. Chu-Carroll at 5:37 PM • 37 Comments •
Category: Bad Probability
A simple, silly, but entertaining example of mathematical illiteracy by way of the Associated Press: OMAHA, Neb. (AP) -- The odds are against something this odd. But a Nebraska Lottery official says there was no mistake: The same three...
Read on »
Posted by Mark C. Chu-Carroll at 11:44 AM • 15 Comments •
Category: Bad Probability
One of the blogs I read regularly is Ben Goldacre's "Bad Science". I recommend it highly. (Which reminds me that I really need to find some time to update my blogroll!) In saturday's entry, he discussed a BBC Radio...
Read on »
Posted by Mark C. Chu-Carroll at 11:18 AM • 7 Comments •
Category: Bad Probability
An alert reader sent me link to a stupid article published by Reuters about the Olympics and Astrology. It's a classic kind of crackpot silliness, which I've described in numerous articles before. It's yet another example of pareidolia -...
Read on »
Posted by Mark C. Chu-Carroll at 5:42 PM • 19 Comments •
Category: Debunking Creationism
Once again, you, my readers, have come through with some really high-grade crackpottery. This one was actually sent to me by its author, but I didn't really look at it until several readers sent me the same link because...
Read on »
Posted by Mark C. Chu-Carroll at 2:35 PM • 21 Comments •
Category: Bad Probability
Remember when I talked about the problems with Bayesian probability? As you'll probably recall, one of the things that drives me crazy about Bayesianism is that you get a constant stream of crackpots abusing it. Since the basic assumption...
Read on »
Posted by Mark C. Chu-Carroll at 2:12 PM • 51 Comments •
Category: Bad Probability
The bulk of this part of the review is looking at the total train-wreck that is chapter 4, which contains Bittinger's version of dreadful probabilistic arguments for why Christianity must be true. But before I do that, I need...
Read on »
Posted by Mark C. Chu-Carroll at 10:23 AM • 13 Comments •